The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 June 2012, 04:36 AM   #121
Kingair
"TRF" Member
 
Kingair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Marc
Location: SoCal
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by witch watch View Post
Bravo sir very well said
x 2

HAGOne

Kingair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2012, 04:49 AM   #122
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
Kodiak, I am pleased to read that your aunt has decided to hold onto these two pieces. I am sure that they hold sentimental memories for you.

Sorry that you have had to endure the "The third degree" and had to justify yourself to some members, that is not what the forum is about.

I can fully understand, should you never wish to take part again.

Regards

Tony
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2012, 10:07 PM   #123
Len
"TRF" Member
 
Len's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Hans Henrik
Location: EU, Denmark
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by kodiak View Post
Hello,

As I said I have been a long time lurker here and I have read about various vintage watches being sent down to Bob Ridley. I sent him an email today and placed a call to him as well to see if he can help. At the very least we are going to see what it will cost to have both watches serviced. Hopefully he can shed some light on how old they are, a value etc.
Could be interesting to see Bob Ridleys respond to your mail. Maybe you can post it here ?
Len is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2012, 10:37 PM   #124
Paladin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Len View Post
Could be interesting to see Bob Ridleys respond to your mail. Maybe you can post it here ?
I too would be VERY interested to see Bob's response and estimates.
__________________
1601, 1675/3, 16753, 16750, 16750, 16700, 16610, 18238
Paladin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2012, 04:57 AM   #125
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,425
Why do you honestly think that Kodiak would wish to any further part in this thread.

Just so that he has to either justify or leave himself open to further criticism.
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2012, 05:40 AM   #126
mopsey
"TRF" Member
 
mopsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.
That is all.
__________________
Lest we forget.
mopsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2012, 07:28 AM   #127
Paladin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,232
Well I owe the OP a huge apology I hope he accepts. My skepticism while not unreasonable In my opinion, was wrong. I came to this conclusion after review of the OP's postings and some additional research.

I hope that your aunt hands those family heirlooms downto family members who will treasure them, restore them and wear them.

Again, I was wrong! I apologize for doubting the veracity of your story.
__________________
1601, 1675/3, 16753, 16750, 16750, 16700, 16610, 18238
Paladin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2012, 08:47 AM   #128
Tom R
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: UK
Watch: 216570 & 1601
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat30093 View Post
I take it that you are joking
Hmm. I dunno... I mean: My serious envy versus Other people's fortune, who aren't me?
It's a tough one!

of course I'm joking you plonker!
Maybe my humour isn't for everyone! Sorry.

Anyway - I think we can all agree that it's threads like this that really make you wish you had more dead relatives.


PS. Special prize for you if you can guess if I'm joking or not about the last bit!
Tom R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2012, 01:32 PM   #129
Flyjet601
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
I find it somewhat poor character on certains posters parts to ridicule the OP post.
These watches are not Picasso's where only 1 was created. These are mass produced products available to the public, and if Paul Newman didn't wear one, no one would care about the Daytona as with many wannabe's. When they were being produced, Rolex couldn't give them away.....now it's a "grail". A lot of hype.
So is it possible a person bought these inexpensive watches back then and put them in a safe, sure.
If the OP found them, good for them.
Enjoy them and don't worry about what anyone hiding behind a computer has to say!
__________________
I used to be indecisive, now I'm not sure
Flyjet601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2012, 01:14 AM   #130
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,180
IBTL!
Gaijin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.