ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 February 2010, 04:22 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
AND my insert pearl actually glows. (And you say......but mine's original to the watch )
|
19 February 2010, 04:27 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
I hope Jedly is the same guy from VRF, if so I believe he has a lot of experience of vintage Rolex and can benefit us here on TRF
|
19 February 2010, 05:01 AM | #33 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
Bezel why, its pristine. Here's the complete set with the original box and papers (not service). |
|
19 February 2010, 05:06 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
|
19 February 2010, 05:08 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: leeds,uk
Watch: BLUE ARAB DAYTONA
Posts: 691
|
|
19 February 2010, 05:11 AM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
|
19 February 2010, 05:15 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Danny
Location: Denmark
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 29
|
|
19 February 2010, 05:15 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: leeds,uk
Watch: BLUE ARAB DAYTONA
Posts: 691
|
|
19 February 2010, 05:16 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Danny
Location: Denmark
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 29
|
|
19 February 2010, 05:33 AM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
|
19 February 2010, 05:37 AM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
|
19 February 2010, 06:57 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
most ad's held back the anchors (used them as key rings lol) and often the swing tags as stock control so its moslty acceptable to call a set complete without them.
lovely watch you have there dd but if you want to put it up as contender for non better you'll find thats a big claim to make, ( if you want to be in the running id strongly suggest you find a period bezel insert rather than the rather unpleasant skinny font service one thats in, and a nice matching non luminous dot, and a superdome crystal - non of which should be that hard to do. Interestingly your hands seem a tad off, do they still glow, as from the scans its hard to tell if they are luminova service ones also ? as for finding drsd, its weird world these days, the majority of trading mis going on behind closed doors with very little adverising going on, so you need to know where and with whom to look, but heres a good one with the kind of patina that people like, up in public ; http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...-%26gt%3B+more and heres a nice one at similar price with a dealer in NYC ... http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x...6/L1230697.jpg http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x...6/L1230714.jpg heres a nice loose one, that has just sold . http://www.10pastten.com/inventory/d...?item_id=TA423 |
19 February 2010, 06:59 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
hey mav, never said he'd find one at the quality level of yours mate !!!
|
19 February 2010, 07:01 AM | #44 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
I don't think I did. Here is another 6262 and a 6239 in a catalog.
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=76235 |
19 February 2010, 07:13 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
from the outside apart from some very early ones with a slightly different bezel calibration there is no real noticeable difference between a 6262 and a 6239. the difference is in the movement.
on the dials, a 6239 can have no daytona, daytona highset up near rolex or as normal near the 6 oclock sub dial. a 6262 can have no daytona , daytona highset up near rolex or as normal near the 6 oclock sub dial. the scans you show DD, the top one is an oddity, its a 6238/9 type crossover, doctors model and is by no means standard the bottom scan is the catalogue page for exotic dials ? |
19 February 2010, 07:18 AM | #46 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Quote:
And that DRSD in those pictures has a wide bevel on the side of the case/lugs. I don't like it and I don't think it was sold with the case looking like that. |
|
19 February 2010, 07:19 AM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
Quote:
Pav's knocked you for six with this rig. Outta the park. I'd love to go to one of these watch fairs, perhaps Anastasios will sign me in the next time he's over.
__________________
..33 |
|
19 February 2010, 07:20 AM | #48 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Quote:
|
|
19 February 2010, 07:20 AM | #49 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
|
19 February 2010, 07:25 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Mark
Location: Melbourne Aus
Posts: 323
|
|
19 February 2010, 07:29 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: leeds,uk
Watch: BLUE ARAB DAYTONA
Posts: 691
|
|
19 February 2010, 07:33 AM | #52 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
Quote:
LOL, thats the point the watch was sold with a bevel like that, there are only two service centres that can recreate it, Rolex UK and Rolex Geneva ( where that was serviced) and generally people pay a premium for the ' bexley' edge as its known, thats why the watch is shot to show the edge . there is no one who kills a case polish better than Rolex USA, mind you there is no one in the world who kills vintage watches better than Rolex usa full stop !!!! heres another ; http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...s/IMG_2079.jpg |
|
19 February 2010, 07:35 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
and on the daytona's, i should say that one big diiferential on price between the two models for many people is that generally rolex will still service a 6262 and wont service a 6239
|
19 February 2010, 07:38 AM | #54 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Quote:
|
|
19 February 2010, 07:48 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
then it was misguided....
here is probably what most would consider to be the best one to ever surface (certainly in terms of general sale retail not thincase, double name, tropical etc), found by JD back in 2007, having been worn 2-3 times then placed in a drawer. The most amazing safe queen patina that people would kill for note the bevelled edge, exactly as a 70's dive watch would have come. a square cut or rounded edge is a sure sign of a service centre, or local watchmaker not having the ability or inclination to do it as it should be. for the full story on this one and bigger scans http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...2&rev=&reveal= |
19 February 2010, 07:52 AM | #56 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Here is a picture from the Double Red Sea Dweller website. The bevel is very small. You can take away metal but you can't add it. It was not there when it was produced (not the wide bevel but a very small one).
Edit- I can't copy that picture, its too big. If you look at the first picture of the Mark IV dial/case you will notice there is only a very small bevel. A large bevel is used to cover up large edge nicks IMO. http://doubleredseadweller.com/dr_dials.htm |
19 February 2010, 08:04 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
|
err, yes, thats because if it is serviced by anyone other then it receives a side polish and a top polish and both have to be done more if there are nicks on the edge, as the side is taken down it reduced the size of the bevel, the three way polish of side top and angle is where it gets difficult.
i think thats one of ed's old ones, and whilst it has a nice case, it isn#t unpolished. have a good look at the NOS stock one link posted above, that should be your reference point of how it left the factory. if the issue is how was it originally, its bevelled, if the question is how it should be if maintained by the manufacturer(i.e. rolex geneva, not an affilitate service centre) then the answer is bevelled. if the question is which do you prefer then that of course is a personal choice and everyone will make their own mind up. These days though the move is originality, and original is bevelled IMHO |
19 February 2010, 11:29 AM | #58 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
The new supercase models do not have the beveled edges and on most older models the bevel is worn making it look rounded. =) maverick |
|
19 February 2010, 11:31 AM | #59 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
|
19 February 2010, 11:34 AM | #60 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.