The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 22 June 2015, 10:55 PM   #31
datejust24
"TRF" Member
 
datejust24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith1 View Post
I know the Submariner bezel insert is $375 at RSC.
For ceramic ?
datejust24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2015, 11:37 PM   #32
KBM
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,386
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2015, 01:08 AM   #33
sco
"TRF" Member
 
sco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
I'd still take Cerachrom any day of the week... The positives outweigh the negatives to me and many others. The "wet" look alone is worth it...
sco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2015, 02:16 AM   #34
Keith1
"TRF" Member
 
Keith1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Diego
Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD
Posts: 2,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith1 View Post
I know the Submariner bezel insert is $375 at RSC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by datejust24 View Post
For ceramic ?

Yes, $375 for the Submariner ceramic insert.
Keith1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2015, 02:20 AM   #35
cvhjhj
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: uk
Posts: 3
how the hell did you manage breaking it?
cvhjhj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2015, 04:18 AM   #36
ronricks
2024 Pledge Member
 
ronricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 2,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by sco View Post
I'd still take Cerachrom any day of the week... The positives outweigh the negatives to me and many others. The "wet" look alone is worth it...
X2

cerachrome is much more durable than the cheap aluminum inserts and so arre the upgraded bracelets on the ceramic models.
ronricks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2015, 07:06 AM   #37
DubaiWatchGuy
"TRF" Member
 
DubaiWatchGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Dubai
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mak2013 View Post
Thats not too bad.
Green ALUMINUM insert for 16610LV sub is $475 at RSC


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I thought they were 100 dollars?
DubaiWatchGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2015, 08:00 AM   #38
WS9D
"TRF" Member
 
WS9D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,364
I'll still take ceramic over aluminum.

So far both my ceramics have been able to withstand the abuse from my three year old son.....knock on wood...

I meant I've knocked the ceramic on wood. Actually, just today, my gmt2c took a direct hit from the (spring loaded) garage door handle ( to the kitchen) as my kid was slamming it on me. Not even a minor blemish. They are tough. U really have to go out of ur way to break it imho.
WS9D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2015, 11:22 AM   #39
Lrlx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ny
Posts: 292
Well worth the risk to be stunned by that beauty day in day out. ;)
Lrlx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2015, 05:02 PM   #40
smurfpiss
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Singapore
Posts: 12
Ceramic bezels

Aluminum bezels can't actually shatter like in the photo. They will however get scratched, scuffed and faded over time. Cerachrom won't wear out and will continue to look pristine provided you don't expose it to high impact forces against hard materials.
smurfpiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2015, 10:11 PM   #41
Scholar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by smurfpiss View Post
Aluminum bezels can't actually shatter like in the photo. They will however get scratched, scuffed and faded over time. Cerachrom won't wear out and will continue to look pristine provided you don't expose it to high impact forces against hard materials.
That's one of the best parts!
Scholar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 03:33 AM   #42
red.earth
"TRF" Member
 
red.earth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
It'll buff out
Made me laugh out loud.

Sent from my phone
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar |
red.earth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 10:52 AM   #43
brucewayne1959
"TRF" Member
 
brucewayne1959's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Rich
Location: Tampa
Watch: Tudor Black Bay
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by swils8610 View Post
I'm guessing around $1200

I concur! Maybe more!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________

"The world breaks everyone, and afterward, many are strong at the broken places." Ernest Hemingway
Talent is a chisel, but hard work and effort is the hammer. God puts the chisel in your hand but expects you to pick up the hammer and swing...
brucewayne1959 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2015, 01:09 PM   #44
toneafficianado
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
toneafficianado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zweig View Post
Colonel Kurtz would love it
"The horror!"
toneafficianado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2015, 01:18 PM   #45
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronricks View Post
X2

cerachrome is much more durable than the cheap aluminum inserts and so arre the upgraded bracelets on the ceramic models.
FWIW, there are actually some spot weld areas on the newer clasps that are potentially more prone to failure than the old tuna can clasps. The Glidelocks also occasionally have jamming issues.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2015, 01:20 PM   #46
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubaiWatchGuy View Post
I thought they were 100 dollars?
He's talking about the green LV aluminum insert. The black inserts are much less expensive.
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2015, 02:08 PM   #47
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by sco View Post
I'd still take Cerachrom any day of the week... The positives outweigh the negatives to me and many others. The "wet" look alone is worth it...
X2
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.