ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ocabj · 3 September 2014, 11:34 AM

I have only tried on the rose gold version. There was no white gold version at the Omega Boutique preview event(s).

It is very, very tempting though. I probably would have pulled the trigger on a SS version at the $8000 range, so it's probably a good thing they made them in gold only, thereby saving me the hit to the wallet.

mps354 · 22 December 2014, 03:53 AM

Had to resurrect this thread...

Stumbled upon the omega boutique in NYC yesterday and tried it on...it was even better in the metal

SUPERDOC · 22 December 2014, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mps354

Had to resurrect this thread...

Stumbled upon the omega boutique in NYC yesterday and tried it on...it was even better in the metal

How is the new Boutique?

Pics I've seen of the renovations look out of this world incredible

mps354 · 22 December 2014, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUPERDOC

How is the new Boutique?

Pics I've seen of the renovations look out of this world incredible

Looks incredible, and it was relatively crowded. I was told the service department will be in there soon

psholtz · 22 December 2014, 01:45 PM

I saw one in the flesh recently as well. Very impressed, very beautiful watch.

Personally I like this Omega (much) better than the new 2014 Cellinis from Rolex..

sweetsdream · 22 December 2014, 11:27 PM

I think these are beautiful and I love the technology in the movement. I also think the price is reasonable for a gold watch.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Cato · 26 December 2014, 05:22 PM

This is the first I've seen of this watch. Very beautiful! Too many of the dress watches have roman numerals, which I am not fond of.

Rashid.bk · 26 December 2014, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lgear080

Still think the new Cellinis are stronger. Not a bad effort,
Then again IMO devilles are widely under appreciated.

No way, Cellini made some strides this year but Cellini cannot even compete with Omega. This watch is perfect and has an anti-magnetic(likely 15,000 gauss) movement, is gorgeous and would by a mile prefer the name Omega on my wrist than Cellini.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweetsdream

I think these are beautiful and I love the technology in the movement. I also think the price is reasonable for a gold watch.

X2

jshepard · 30 December 2014, 02:48 PM

That is one elegant Omega! Makes me want to head off to my local AD!

soundserious · 1 January 2015, 01:44 AM

Absolute home run. I'd love to own one of these. Manual winding co-axial? Yep!

Griffi · 1 January 2015, 03:43 AM

Very nice IMHO. Classic, vintage feel and really nice in person.
I would go for the yellow gold, fits it more I think, plus Sedna (rose) version too pink for my taste.

some pix.

Choo Yao Chuen · 1 January 2015, 08:19 AM

I LOVE IT!!!

Passionata · 1 January 2015, 08:22 AM

This watch is just increadibly nice

sarir97 · 3 January 2015, 04:58 PM

Lovely watch, but at 40mm, too large IMO. 38 or at most 39 is the sweet spot for dress watches.

capote · 4 January 2015, 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarir97

Lovely watch, but at 40mm, too large IMO. 38 or at most 39 is the sweet spot for dress watches.

I agree, its too big. But if movement allows Omega will hopefully release a smaller version later on and maybe one without the date window.

masterkiller · 16 November 2015, 07:46 PM

A homerun from Omega for sure! I tried on the White gold and it is a piece of art, simple and elegant!

my friends pic!

photodork · 17 November 2015, 04:46 AM

a real beauty! thanks for the pics.

Tony64 · 17 November 2015, 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarir97

Lovely watch, but at 40mm, too large IMO. 38 or at most 39 is the sweet spot for dress watches.

I agree, a more modest size would be perfect! Everything else about this watch looks terrific.

Eric Chan · 20 November 2015, 04:07 PM

It is pretty nice.

Caught my eye when it first came out and I checked it out again tonight. Definitely a contender for me if I was ever was to pull the trigger on a dress watch.

TheBluePrince · 20 November 2015, 07:32 PM

Pretty but too big for a dress watch.

The movement looks awful too, just a huge bridge on show. I guess it's just an 8500 with the rotor removed really?

vman · 21 November 2015, 01:51 PM

Tried this on. The front of the watch is super nice. Unfortunately, the movement looks quite basic. In this price range you should get a much better finish. Sorry, but I will pass.

masterkiller · 25 November 2015, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vman

Tried this on. The front of the watch is super nice. Unfortunately, the movement looks quite basic. In this price range you should get a much better finish. Sorry, but I will pass.

The movement is Beautiful !

3 September 2014, 11:34 AM	#31
ocabj "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: Jonathan Ocab Location: Riverside, CA Watch: 116710BLNR Posts: 279	I have only tried on the rose gold version. There was no white gold version at the Omega Boutique preview event(s). It is very, very tempting though. I probably would have pulled the trigger on a SS version at the $8000 range, so it's probably a good thing they made them in gold only, thereby saving me the hit to the wallet. __________________ They took my rings, they took my Rolex. I looked at the brotha said, "Damn, what's next?"

1 January 2015, 08:22 AM	#43
Passionata "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: N/A Watch: the girls Posts: 7,095	This watch is just increadibly nice __________________ Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- newhttps://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE new http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1

16 November 2015, 07:46 PM	#46
masterkiller "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Sweden Watch: Rolex, AP & PAM... Posts: 1,403	A homerun from Omega for sure! I tried on the White gold and it is a piece of art, simple and elegant! my friends pic! __________________ Rolex - SubC... AP - Diver... Panerai - PAM380 Omega - Speedy PRO

22 December 2014, 03:53 AM	#32
mps354 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: CT Posts: 8,974	Had to resurrect this thread... Stumbled upon the omega boutique in NYC yesterday and tried it on...it was even better in the metal

22 December 2014, 01:45 PM	#35
psholtz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Los Angeles Watch: Speedy, Milgauss Posts: 194	I saw one in the flesh recently as well. Very impressed, very beautiful watch. Personally I like this Omega (much) better than the new 2014 Cellinis from Rolex..

22 December 2014, 11:27 PM	#36
sweetsdream "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Tampa, FL Posts: 26	I think these are beautiful and I love the technology in the movement. I also think the price is reasonable for a gold watch. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

26 December 2014, 05:22 PM	#37
Cato Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Land of the Lost Watch: 116610LN Posts: 2,201	This is the first I've seen of this watch. Very beautiful! Too many of the dress watches have roman numerals, which I am not fond of.

30 December 2014, 02:48 PM	#39
jshepard "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: USA Watch: GMTII Posts: 1,180	That is one elegant Omega! Makes me want to head off to my local AD!

1 January 2015, 01:44 AM	#40
soundserious "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: usofmfa Posts: 3,157	Absolute home run. I'd love to own one of these. Manual winding co-axial? Yep!

1 January 2015, 08:19 AM	#42
Choo Yao Chuen "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Taiwan Posts: 518	I LOVE IT!!!

3 January 2015, 04:58 PM	#44
sarir97 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Mehrdad Location: Scottsdale, AZ Watch: Ω & Rolex Posts: 320	Lovely watch, but at 40mm, too large IMO. 38 or at most 39 is the sweet spot for dress watches.

17 November 2015, 04:46 AM	#47
photodork "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Real Name: greg Location: canada Watch: '57 oyster royal Posts: 55	a real beauty! thanks for the pics.

20 November 2015, 04:07 PM	#49
Eric Chan "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Eric Chan Location: Vancouver, BC CAN Watch: Day-Date 118238 Posts: 8,798	It is pretty nice. Caught my eye when it first came out and I checked it out again tonight. Definitely a contender for me if I was ever was to pull the trigger on a dress watch.

20 November 2015, 07:32 PM	#50
TheBluePrince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: London Posts: 2,081	Pretty but too big for a dress watch. The movement looks awful too, just a huge bridge on show. I guess it's just an 8500 with the rotor removed really?

21 November 2015, 01:51 PM	#51
vman "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Capt Swerve Location: North Carolina Watch: less TV Posts: 2,224	Tried this on. The front of the watch is super nice. Unfortunately, the movement looks quite basic. In this price range you should get a much better finish. Sorry, but I will pass.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)