The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 22 January 2019, 09:28 PM   #181
VICI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
I’ve had zero issues with my 3120 movement. Going to stick with the 15400. More elegant and balanced.

VICI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 04:35 AM   #182
Amiroo
"TRF" Member
 
Amiroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
15400 for the win!

__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR
Rolex Day-Date II 218235
Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710
Amiroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 05:03 AM   #183
Carry The Interest
"TRF" Member
 
Carry The Interest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: LA
Watch: RLX, ALS
Posts: 3,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amiroo View Post
15400 for the win!

Stunning...This right here (or the jumbo in YG with blue dial) is honestly the only colored-gold watch I could ever see myself wearing. (along with the skeleton-dial variant)

You have a beautiful watch there, sir.
Carry The Interest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 10:49 AM   #184
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by VICI View Post
I’ve had zero issues with my 3120 movement. Going to stick with the 15400. More elegant and balanced.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amiroo View Post
15400 for the win!
Lol, this is like going onto a yellow taxi driver forum and asking them if they think Uber is better than cabs. Of course people who have already put their $17k-$20k into an earlier version of a new watch are going to say theirs is better.
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 12:22 PM   #185
Tschyvon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Switzerland
Watch: RO41, BLNR, LV,...
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
Lol, this is like going onto a yellow taxi driver forum and asking them if they think Uber is better than cabs. Of course people who have already put their $17k-$20k into an earlier version of a new watch are going to say theirs is better.
Or the story of the guy that couldn’t have the girl he loved since she moved abroad and try to convince himself that the fatish girl next door is not so bad and actually better because she is available.
Tschyvon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 12:50 PM   #186
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
Nah, more like the younger hotter sister
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 01:24 PM   #187
Phaedrus29
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
Lol, this is like going onto a yellow taxi driver forum and asking them if they think Uber is better than cabs. Of course people who have already put their $17k-$20k into an earlier version of a new watch are going to say theirs is better.

I have the 15400 and love it, but I also love the 15500...it will be nice to see it in person. It certainly has to be possible to own the 15400 and genuinely prefer its looks. It’s not like the 15500 design tweaks are clearly objectively better and therefore those who say they prefer the 15400 must be biased. Can’t you own the 15400 and prefer it for reasons other than that you own one?
Phaedrus29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 01:34 PM   #188
blacke90
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: AP||Panerai||Rolex
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaedrus29 View Post
I have the 15400 and love it, but I also love the 15500...it will be nice to see it in person. It certainly has to be possible to own the 15400 and genuinely prefer its looks. It’s not like the 15500 design tweaks are clearly objectively better and therefore those who say they prefer the 15400 must be biased. Can’t you own the 15400 and prefer it for reasons other than that you own one?
+1
Own the 15400 and also love and appreciate the 15500 in a different way than 15400. Would still feel the same way if I didn’t own the 15400. To me I see elegant/classy (15400) vs sporty/modern (15500). Not one or the other is better—just different. And yes yes, I’m fully aware the 15500 has an updated new movement.
blacke90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 01:36 PM   #189
ericksakti
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: indonesia
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaedrus29 View Post
I have the 15400 and love it, but I also love the 15500...it will be nice to see it in person. It certainly has to be possible to own the 15400 and genuinely prefer its looks. It’s not like the 15500 design tweaks are clearly objectively better and therefore those who say they prefer the 15400 must be biased. Can’t you own the 15400 and prefer it for reasons other than that you own one?
I think the 15400 looks more timeless and classic, therefore it fits older people better.

Whereas I feel like 15500 is younger and sportier, so if you are still young and can afford AP already this may be the watch to go other than the ROO,
The 15400 feels more elegant, but if you want a watch that feel sporty and dressy at the same time 15500 is a good choice.
ericksakti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 01:43 PM   #190
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
Lol, this is like going onto a yellow taxi driver forum and asking them if they think Uber is better than cabs. Of course people who have already put their $17k-$20k into an earlier version of a new watch are going to say theirs is better.
Umm, I have a 15400 and was commenting on the 3120 and its issues. I also mentioned that it is premature to say the 4302 is a superior movement. Not everyone talks up their own book.
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 02:18 PM   #191
jtsmith439
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Paradise
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericksakti View Post
first batch for all colors in singapore is sold out, if you want this watch better contact your dealer or boutique asap as I think demand is very strong for this new model.
Did the Singapore APs move their 15400 waiting lists across to the 15500 or have they started a new list?

I can't imagine batches being very substantial...
jtsmith439 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 05:05 PM   #192
Tschyvon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Switzerland
Watch: RO41, BLNR, LV,...
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericksakti View Post
I think the 15400 looks more timeless and classic, therefore it fits older people better.

Whereas I feel like 15500 is younger and sportier, so if you are still young and can afford AP already this may be the watch to go other than the ROO,
The 15400 feels more elegant, but if you want a watch that feel sporty and dressy at the same time 15500 is a good choice.
I am 31 and I disagree
Tschyvon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 05:14 PM   #193
lhawli
"TRF" Member
 
lhawli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
Lol, this is like going onto a yellow taxi driver forum and asking them if they think Uber is better than cabs. Of course people who have already put their $17k-$20k into an earlier version of a new watch are going to say theirs is better.

At least we own the watch LOL

Plus, wouldn’t be too hard to flip for the 15500 now would it. So what’s your point?

I would not trade my 15400 for a date window that ran out of dial space. What an afterthought!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01]
Rolex DateJust 41 [126334]
Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV]
Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR]
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]
lhawli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 05:37 PM   #194
ericksakti
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: indonesia
Posts: 77
Well actually I like the new date window better as ita bigger and easier to see. I feel the previous date window is too centered (understandable as the movement is too small for 41mm case)
ericksakti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 05:51 PM   #195
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericksakti View Post
Well actually I like the new date window better as ita bigger and easier to see. I feel the previous date window is too centered (understandable as the movement is too small for 41mm case)
Seriously. That's one of the better features for me!
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 06:05 PM   #196
lhawli
"TRF" Member
 
lhawli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericksakti View Post
Well actually I like the new date window better as ita bigger and easier to see. I feel the previous date window is too centered (understandable as the movement is too small for 41mm case)

I agree with all your said but the fact that the window is cut off at the edge of the dial just kills the 15500 for me. They should have not done the minute track that way dividing the dial. Had they kept the old minute track style of the 15400 with the dial going all the way to the edge of the case it would have been much nicer. Of course this is my opinion and I respect yours.

As for the 3120, it may have been small for the 15400 but by no means would I state it as being “too centered”. Had the date window stuck out further from the hour markers I would have agreed but not the case.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01]
Rolex DateJust 41 [126334]
Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV]
Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR]
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]
lhawli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 06:11 PM   #197
ericksakti
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: indonesia
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by lhawli View Post
I agree with all your said but the fact that the window is cut off at the edge of the dial just kills the 15500 for me. They should have not done the minute track that way dividing the dial. Had they kept the old minute track style of the 15400 with the dial going all the way to the edge of the case it would have been much nicer. Of course this is my opinion and I respect yours.

As for the 3120, it may have been small for the 15400 but by no means would I state it as being “too centered”. Had the date window stuck out further from the hour markers I would have agreed but not the case.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
hmm yes I think the best position for the date window should be in between the old position and the new position, that way its closer to the edge but not too close at the same time
ericksakti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 08:07 PM   #198
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by lhawli View Post
I agree with all your said but the fact that the window is cut off at the edge of the dial just kills the 15500 for me. They should have not done the minute track that way dividing the dial. Had they kept the old minute track style of the 15400 with the dial going all the way to the edge of the case it would have been much nicer. Of course this is my opinion and I respect yours.

I think the fatter minute track was needed because they couldn't have carved a little bit of tapestry between the date window and edge of the dial.

I suppose the movement could have been designed just a tad smaller, which would have left more room.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 10:59 PM   #199
lhawli
"TRF" Member
 
lhawli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
AP 15400 vs 15500

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
I think the fatter minute track was needed because they couldn't have carved a little bit of tapestry between the date window and edge of the dial.



I suppose the movement could have been designed just a tad smaller, which would have left more room.

Not sure about that, mate! Look at the 15202 - had they done it that way I would be the first to say I’ll flip my 15400 for the 15500. Even the 15202 uses the thinner and longer hour markers like the 15400 that are more elegant.

I’m not in the know but based on the articles I’ve been reading, they designed the caliber for the 11.59 and shoved it in the RO. Not sure it was designed for the 15500 in mind.

15202


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01]
Rolex DateJust 41 [126334]
Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV]
Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR]
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]
lhawli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2019, 11:49 PM   #200
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
Lol, this is like going onto a yellow taxi driver forum and asking them if they think Uber is better than cabs. Of course people who have already put their $17k-$20k into an earlier version of a new watch are going to say theirs is better.
What a flawed argument ... any 15400 owner can sell their watch, buy a 15500 and depending on model, even pocket some cash.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 01:17 AM   #201
RolexZen
"TRF" Member
 
RolexZen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
What a flawed argument ... any 15400 owner can sell their watch, buy a 15500 and depending on model, even pocket some cash.
Speculate much?
RolexZen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 01:18 AM   #202
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexZen View Post
Speculate much?
Care to elaborate?
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 01:28 AM   #203
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by rexg1 View Post
Also do you guys think the 15500 prices will be higher than the 15400? Just curious.
Congrats on the new watch. Great choice. Prices for the 15400 will actually go up. The 15500 is priced at $19,200.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 01:29 AM   #204
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by lhawli View Post
Not sure about that, mate! Look at the 15202 - had they done it that way I would be the first to say I’ll flip my 15400 for the 15500. Even the 15202 uses the thinner and longer hour markers like the 15400 that are more elegant.

I’m not in the know but based on the articles I’ve been reading, they designed the caliber for the 11.59 and shoved it in the RO. Not sure it was designed for the 15500 in mind.

15202


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Exactly what they did with the calibre.

https://www.watchcollectinglifestyle...19-introducing
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 01:35 AM   #205
neeko
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Cali
Posts: 10
Ap 15400
neeko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 04:48 AM   #206
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexZen View Post
Speculate much?
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
Care to elaborate?
Well we're talking blue only here right? Because black and white 15400s can be had for relatively close to retail in the classifieds.

My thoughts are that you'd need to sell your blue 15400 right now to get maximum price, and then go a few months without a RO waiting for the 15500 to be released. Then you need to be first on the list to actually get a 15500 relatively quickly for retail.

If you're going the gray market route, I'm assuming the 15500 will start around the price the gray market 15400s are now. Right now, used blue 15400 sell for close to the price of new, but that might not be the case after the 15500 is around for a bit. It's not that the 15500s will "flood" the market, of course, but we'll certainly see a lot of "incomings" around the same time. Unless you're getting one for retail (which is possible for some people of course), I don't see a situation happening in which you can sell a few years old, used 15400, buy a gray market 15500 immediately, and ALSO pocket a bunch of cash.
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 04:57 AM   #207
lhawli
"TRF" Member
 
lhawli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
Well we're talking blue only here right? Because black and white 15400s can be had for relatively close to retail in the classifieds.



My thoughts are that you'd need to sell your blue 15400 right now to get maximum price, and then go a few months without a RO waiting for the 15500 to be released. Then you need to be first on the list to actually get a 15500 relatively quickly for retail.



If you're going the gray market route, I'm assuming the 15500 will start around the price the gray market 15400s are now. Right now, used blue 15400 sell for close to the price of new, but that might not be the case after the 15500 is around for a bit. It's not that the 15500s will "flood" the market, of course, but we'll certainly see a lot of "incomings" around the same time. Unless you're getting one for retail (which is possible for some people of course), I don't see a situation happening in which you can sell a few years old, used 15400, buy a gray market 15500 immediately, and ALSO pocket a bunch of cash.

You’re whole basis is hinged on the fact that the 15400 will stay as is - as we all know nothing does. Throw in a discontinued 15400 and your argument has no grounds.

Not disagreeing with your rational - just saying you got to look at it both ways.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01]
Rolex DateJust 41 [126334]
Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV]
Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR]
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]
lhawli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 06:00 AM   #208
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
Well we're talking blue only here right? Because black and white 15400s can be had for relatively close to retail in the classifieds.

My thoughts are that you'd need to sell your blue 15400 right now to get maximum price, and then go a few months without a RO waiting for the 15500 to be released. Then you need to be first on the list to actually get a 15500 relatively quickly for retail.

If you're going the gray market route, I'm assuming the 15500 will start around the price the gray market 15400s are now. Right now, used blue 15400 sell for close to the price of new, but that might not be the case after the 15500 is around for a bit. It's not that the 15500s will "flood" the market, of course, but we'll certainly see a lot of "incomings" around the same time. Unless you're getting one for retail (which is possible for some people of course), I don't see a situation happening in which you can sell a few years old, used 15400, buy a gray market 15500 immediately, and ALSO pocket a bunch of cash.
You are missing the point. At today's market I can make money on mine and I am confident I could get at 500 at retail with wait (Which I wouldn't really mind). Tomorrow it might be different ... irrelevant if you want a different piece. Either way, I do not plan on selling as I prefer my 400.

Point is, if you don't like it .. you sell it and get what you want ... may win some may lose some (as I've done more than a few times over the years and many times over with different 15400s). The whole "people who own one will say it is better" argument is flawed. These people (myself included) can buy a 15500 same as you and anybody else. As simple as that. No speculation whatsoever.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 06:01 AM   #209
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,422
Double post.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2019, 06:19 AM   #210
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
I suppose the benefit of having the 15400 and wanting to upgrade is that the wait time isn’t an issue because you do have something similar on your wrist in the meantime.
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.