ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Analysing You · 3 November 2019, 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat_ninja

Gotta see the LV thing play out first... I’m not really a LV guy.

As you know brother, neither am I

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

atalien2005 · 3 November 2019, 06:01 AM

The 64 for me but I do want to upgrade to the 5990.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JorgeCCW · 3 November 2019, 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearxj86

5167a - Had both and prefer the lighter, simpler timepiece

+ 1

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Preacher · 3 November 2019, 08:10 AM

5167. Less is more my friends.

Tay821 · 3 November 2019, 08:53 AM

67 for me. Thinness and clean dial vs gmt utility. Use the iPhone to tel the time 9/10 times. Adding and subtracting hours from my current time zone isn’t typically the toughest task of my day either

Helmi · 3 November 2019, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ap1

64 as it’s more intriguing to my eye. 67 a bit too plain. Prefer the 11 for that

+1

GB-man · 3 November 2019, 05:26 PM

I really like the aquanaut and it was the watch that lured me into Patek. I find both 67 and 64 to be superb but the 64 is my choice push comes to shove. The balance of the dial and the overall proportions are fantastic combined with the unusually well executed complication.

Token74 · 3 November 2019, 06:47 PM

5164 for me. The 5167 is a bit ‘meh’ to my eyes.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MCMartiny · 3 November 2019, 07:19 PM

I am biased, but 5164 for me! Proportions are nicer and more sporty plus the globe-in-globe design of the dial is really great in person. I also love the practicality of the travel time complication.

np2016 · 4 November 2019, 12:16 AM

I picked the 5167 because its simple and elegant plus flies under the radar. If you travel significantly for work or leisure than go with the 5164.

Vipes · 4 November 2019, 12:41 AM

Had the 5164 but given the choice I would pick the 5167. I like the simplicity of the dial and how thin it is.

tonupbklyn · 4 November 2019, 02:32 AM

my vote...

Simon.DGV · 4 November 2019, 05:01 AM

Both Patek nice watches.

Try put side by side with
Rolex 2 tone GMT Master 2
It’s like heaven and earth

Rolex has so much more impact

Aquanaut worn by Soros,
Rolex GMT worn by richest hotel owners in HK
with over 10 Rolls Royce in his home.

GB-man · 4 November 2019, 05:15 AM

The Argonaut · 4 November 2019, 08:11 AM

64, and was planning on it. Then the universe turned upside down.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CamSLC · 4 November 2019, 08:23 AM

67. I like the classic simplicity.

inxs777 · 5 November 2019, 06:31 AM

Had both, the 5164 stayed.

Bearxj86 · 5 November 2019, 06:36 AM

Owned these 3- stuck with the 5167a

Note the 5164A is about 50% thicker so it really is a chunky monkey. It also felt 30% heavier. Would say the 67r and 64a weigh the same.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

gregvisser · 11 November 2019, 06:50 PM

Had the same decision a while back (when you could get a 5167 for below retail). I ended up with a 5167A and bought the Batman for travel. Best of both worlds.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sgfortino · 12 November 2019, 12:51 AM

I love the simplicity of the 5167 but given my wrist size picked up a 5165 last year. Love the clean dial. That said, if I had a bigger wrist the 5164 would be my choice....feel like there is too much open real estate on the larger dial of the 5167 (vs 5165).

Codik · 12 November 2019, 05:11 AM

I made my choice :)

SL BRABUS · 12 November 2019, 05:23 AM

Yes, this been brought up many time (5167 vs 5164).......

There no wrong choice......

If you LOVE the 64 then go for it......

As for me I mention this many time like a broken record in my past posts......

Quote:

Originally Posted by SL BRABUS

If I was to force to spent $35,380

It would be 5167 on bracelet version plus rubber strap with the deployant option, Rolex 126710 BLRO, and left over money on vacation with fine food...

Calatrava r · 12 November 2019, 07:14 AM

I would go for the 64 largely because I am not a fan of date windows at 3 o'clock. To me its such a dated look and throws the dial out of balance.

iazrollie · 13 November 2019, 12:46 AM

Traded out of a 5167 into a 5164. Never looked back. I love the weight and the timezone functionality, which suits my road warrior lifestyle perfectly.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

locutus49 · 13 November 2019, 01:10 AM

I have the 67 and if I upgrade it will be to the gold model. Reason being I don't travel much. If I did travel I would get the 64.

Superburrito · 13 November 2019, 01:22 AM

I have a 64 now and had a 67. Both are fantastic.
Just get whichever you can find. I find the 64 is slightly less comfortable, and the date is hard to read, but the 64 has more wrist presence.

The 67 is smaller but just perfection.

woof · 13 November 2019, 04:54 AM

I pick 67

mailman · 13 November 2019, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonupbklyn

my vote...

This one gets my vote

Jonbut76 · 13 November 2019, 12:21 PM

IMO: 67 in Gold and 64 in steel

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ichiran · 13 November 2019, 12:28 PM

Red 5167 please.
attachment.jpg

3 November 2019, 08:10 AM	#34
Preacher "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Middle England Watch: Rolex of course Posts: 526	5167. Less is more my friends. __________________ Rolex is the King of Watches...indeed.

3 November 2019, 05:26 PM	#37
GB-man 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 36,859	I really like the aquanaut and it was the watch that lured me into Patek. I find both 67 and 64 to be superb but the 64 is my choice push comes to shove. The balance of the dial and the overall proportions are fantastic combined with the unusually well executed complication. __________________

3 November 2019, 06:47 PM	#38
Token74 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Vince Location: England Watch: Too many! Posts: 5,707	5164 for me. The 5167 is a bit ‘meh’ to my eyes. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune

4 November 2019, 05:15 AM	#44
GB-man 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 36,859	__________________

13 November 2019, 12:46 AM	#54
iazrollie "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Ian Location: NY Watch: All of them Posts: 3,245	Traded out of a 5167 into a 5164. Never looked back. I love the weight and the timezone functionality, which suits my road warrior lifestyle perfectly. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Rolex, PPs, Breitling

3 November 2019, 06:01 AM	#32
atalien2005 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 36	The 64 for me but I do want to upgrade to the 5990. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

3 November 2019, 08:53 AM	#35
Tay821 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: USA Posts: 913	67 for me. Thinness and clean dial vs gmt utility. Use the iPhone to tel the time 9/10 times. Adding and subtracting hours from my current time zone isn’t typically the toughest task of my day either

3 November 2019, 07:19 PM	#39
MCMartiny "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Somewhere in time Watch: Lange & Patek Posts: 612	I am biased, but 5164 for me! Proportions are nicer and more sporty plus the globe-in-globe design of the dial is really great in person. I also love the practicality of the travel time complication.

4 November 2019, 12:16 AM	#40
np2016 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Ohio Watch: Rolex, Patek, AP, Posts: 522	I picked the 5167 because its simple and elegant plus flies under the radar. If you travel significantly for work or leisure than go with the 5164.

4 November 2019, 12:41 AM	#41
Vipes "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Texas Posts: 4,838	Had the 5164 but given the choice I would pick the 5167. I like the simplicity of the dial and how thin it is.

4 November 2019, 02:32 AM	#42
tonupbklyn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: bklyn Posts: 1,471	my vote...

4 November 2019, 05:01 AM	#43
Simon.DGV "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2019 Location: Australia Watch: Patek World Time Posts: 83	Both Patek nice watches. Try put side by side with Rolex 2 tone GMT Master 2 It’s like heaven and earth Rolex has so much more impact Aquanaut worn by Soros, Rolex GMT worn by richest hotel owners in HK with over 10 Rolls Royce in his home.

4 November 2019, 08:11 AM	#45
The Argonaut "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: VA Watch: GMT Master 16750 Posts: 1,373	64, and was planning on it. Then the universe turned upside down. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

4 November 2019, 08:23 AM	#46
CamSLC "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: USA Watch: Rolex & Patek Posts: 1,436	67. I like the classic simplicity.

5 November 2019, 06:31 AM	#47
inxs777 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Europe Watch: 15305ST Posts: 44	Had both, the 5164 stayed.

5 November 2019, 06:36 AM	#48
Bearxj86 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: Los Angeles Watch: 3970 Posts: 3,801	Owned these 3- stuck with the 5167a Note the 5164A is about 50% thicker so it really is a chunky monkey. It also felt 30% heavier. Would say the 67r and 64a weigh the same. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

11 November 2019, 06:50 PM	#49
gregvisser "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Greg Visser Location: New Zealand Posts: 543	Had the same decision a while back (when you could get a 5167 for below retail). I ended up with a 5167A and bought the Batman for travel. Best of both worlds. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 November 2019, 12:51 AM	#50
sgfortino "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Chicago Watch: Nerd Posts: 807	I love the simplicity of the 5167 but given my wrist size picked up a 5165 last year. Love the clean dial. That said, if I had a bigger wrist the 5164 would be my choice....feel like there is too much open real estate on the larger dial of the 5167 (vs 5165).

12 November 2019, 05:11 AM	#51
Codik "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: UK Posts: 284	I made my choice :)

12 November 2019, 07:14 AM	#53
Calatrava r 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: United States Watch: Rolex and Patek Posts: 10,595	I would go for the 64 largely because I am not a fan of date windows at 3 o'clock. To me its such a dated look and throws the dial out of balance.

13 November 2019, 01:10 AM	#55
locutus49 Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: John Location: La Jolla, CA Watch: Platona Posts: 12,194	I have the 67 and if I upgrade it will be to the gold model. Reason being I don't travel much. If I did travel I would get the 64.

13 November 2019, 01:22 AM	#56
Superburrito "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: California Watch: 26420RO Posts: 448	I have a 64 now and had a 67. Both are fantastic. Just get whichever you can find. I find the 64 is slightly less comfortable, and the date is hard to read, but the 64 has more wrist presence. The 67 is smaller but just perfection. __________________ Current collection: AP 26420RO.OO.A002CA.01, PP 5164A, AP 15202BA, Omega 310.32.42.50.01.002, Tudor m79030b-0003, Garmin Epix Gen 2 Waiting for: AP 126715ST.OO.1356ST.01

13 November 2019, 04:54 AM	#57
woof "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Location: san francisco Watch: SS daytona, Hulk, Posts: 1,297	I pick 67 __________________ Watchdog (Woof) SS daytona,Hulk,DSJC,50th SD, SS SkyD, Zblue, YMblue, MoonPhase, Rootbeer Batman, Sub, Blk GMT, Pepsi,YG Daytona, TTSD, Batgirl, 5167/1A, Speedy, P01, OP, Kermit

13 November 2019, 12:21 PM	#59
Jonbut76 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 163	IMO: 67 in Gold and 64 in steel Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13 November 2019, 12:28 PM	#60
Ichiran 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: Michael Location: Dotonbori Watch: Mostly blue dials Posts: 7,620	Red 5167 please. attachment.jpg

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)