ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Soly20 · 25 April 2019, 08:20 AM

IWC looks great plus there is your grandfather's connection.

Kigan · 28 April 2019, 05:26 PM

IWC Spitfire.

Alex_TA · 29 April 2019, 04:59 AM

AFAIK it should be called Messerschmitt.
IWC supplied watches for German pilots during WWII.

DasKptl · 29 April 2019, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex_TA

AFAIK it should be called Messerschmitt.
IWC supplied watches for German pilots during WWII.

IWC supplied watches also to the British Armed forces in 1944.

So, basically, IWC played with both Axis and Allies during WWII. Both Luftwaffe and RAF.

https://monochrome-watches.com/5-coo...ouldnt-expect/

vaulter1 · 30 April 2019, 11:33 PM

Based on my taste I would disagree with many of the replies and say the Speedmaster, since I find the IWC design much too busy. However, if you're looking to connect with your Grandfather's history through the watch and you think the IWC would do that then opt for that one. A purely practical question - have you tried the spitfire on a bracelet or would you want to? I find the Speedmaster can be nicely dressed up or down but the IWC looks out of place in a dress environment (obviously just my opinion). Lastly, if you're not wedded to these two as an option, have a look at the CWC 1970 RAF PILOTS CHRONOGRAPH which might actually be closer to something your Grandfather would have worn. Either way, keep us updated and enjoy the search.

ts3 · 1 May 2019, 12:16 AM

I very much prefer IWC pieces from the 1990s and early 2000s to their current offering. While I understand the OP wants to buy new I would recommend picking up an IWC Fliegerchronograph 3706 instead. Half the price, tried and tested Valjoux movement, optional + incredibly good pyramid bracelet, and not trying too hard to look vintage. Also prefer the 39mm case of the 3706 over 41mm personally. The rotor noise of the Valjoux is the only downside I can see, not sure how the in-house movement compares in that respect.

ILuvSubs · 16 May 2019, 04:03 PM

No wrong choice here. I personally would go for the IWC Spitfire. OP should consider buying BNIB from one of the trusted sellers on TRF rather than from an AD, as these usually depreciate. The new IWC Spitfire range should start hitting the grey market over the next few months.

Oaker1 · 19 May 2019, 08:04 PM

The Speedy is a classic, but the new IWC Spitfire range is stunning. I would go for the IWC out of the two.

Watcheroo · 20 May 2019, 12:52 AM

I’ve tried that IWC and it wears really well. I like that they’re making smaller watches for a change. I’d go IWC in this case

Watch Rob · 20 May 2019, 01:29 AM

Speedy for me

28 April 2019, 05:26 PM	#32
Kigan "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: EU Watch: Blancpain AC01 Posts: 441	IWC Spitfire. __________________ @diometry

25 April 2019, 08:20 AM	#31
Soly20 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Soly Location: UK/US Watch: Rolex, AP, PP Posts: 3,089	IWC looks great plus there is your grandfather's connection.

29 April 2019, 04:59 AM	#33
Alex_TA "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Tel-Aviv, Israel Posts: 335	AFAIK it should be called Messerschmitt. IWC supplied watches for German pilots during WWII.

30 April 2019, 11:33 PM	#35
vaulter1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: New York, NY Watch: Rolex & Omega Posts: 102	Based on my taste I would disagree with many of the replies and say the Speedmaster, since I find the IWC design much too busy. However, if you're looking to connect with your Grandfather's history through the watch and you think the IWC would do that then opt for that one. A purely practical question - have you tried the spitfire on a bracelet or would you want to? I find the Speedmaster can be nicely dressed up or down but the IWC looks out of place in a dress environment (obviously just my opinion). Lastly, if you're not wedded to these two as an option, have a look at the CWC 1970 RAF PILOTS CHRONOGRAPH which might actually be closer to something your Grandfather would have worn. Either way, keep us updated and enjoy the search.

1 May 2019, 12:16 AM	#36
ts3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2018 Location: Europe Posts: 3,227	I very much prefer IWC pieces from the 1990s and early 2000s to their current offering. While I understand the OP wants to buy new I would recommend picking up an IWC Fliegerchronograph 3706 instead. Half the price, tried and tested Valjoux movement, optional + incredibly good pyramid bracelet, and not trying too hard to look vintage. Also prefer the 39mm case of the 3706 over 41mm personally. The rotor noise of the Valjoux is the only downside I can see, not sure how the in-house movement compares in that respect.

16 May 2019, 04:03 PM	#37
ILuvSubs "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 1,005	No wrong choice here. I personally would go for the IWC Spitfire. OP should consider buying BNIB from one of the trusted sellers on TRF rather than from an AD, as these usually depreciate. The new IWC Spitfire range should start hitting the grey market over the next few months.

19 May 2019, 08:04 PM	#38
Oaker1 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2019 Real Name: Mike Location: UK Watch: Submariner 114060 Posts: 262	The Speedy is a classic, but the new IWC Spitfire range is stunning. I would go for the IWC out of the two.

20 May 2019, 12:52 AM	#39
Watcheroo 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: CT Posts: 3,912	I’ve tried that IWC and it wears really well. I like that they’re making smaller watches for a change. I’d go IWC in this case

20 May 2019, 01:29 AM	#40
Watch Rob "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: Chicago Watch: 114200 Posts: 1,265	Speedy for me

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)