ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 April 2013, 11:26 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bob
Location: NJ
Watch: Less each year...
Posts: 464
|
<42 mm High Quality Diver Options
Hi,
I am looking for some suggestions and opinions on options for a new dive watch. I currently have an IWC Aquatimer 2000 on a bracelet (IW356809). I like the watch in terms of its design but it is not very comfortable on my 7-1/4" (18.4 cm) wrist. It is spec'd at 44 mm but its bezel actually measures >45 mm. So I have been thinking about a new dive watch. I do recreationally dive (only about 12-15 dives per year) and I do own a number of other water resistant sports watches. So Here are a dozen of the best known high-end dive watches: 47 mm - Panerai Luminor Submersible 45 mm - Blancpain Fifty Fathoms Automatique 44 mm - Girard-Perregaux Sea Hawk 44 mm - Grand Seiko SBGA031 44 mm - IWC Aquatimer 2000 44 mm - Rolex Deepsea 43 mm - Bremont Supermarine 42.7 mm - UN Maxi Marine Diver 42 mm - Audemars Piguet Offshore Diver 42 mm - Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Control Diving Automatic Navy SEALS 42 mm - Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 40 mm - Rolex Submariner As you can see, 8 out of the 12 are >42 mm. So in the less than 42 mm category, I see these 4 options: So the Submariner is obviously the most modest in size but its very similar to my Yacht-Master so it doesn't really attract me. The Omega's thickness and the silly helium valve cause me pause. The AP concerns me about its real size which is beyond its 42 mm bezel dimension. The JLC is an interesting watch, but I wonder about how rubber coated bracelet links will hold up. I would appreciate hearing any experiences or opinions between these options or experience on some of the larger models (>42 mm) that wear smaller than my IWC in your experience? Thanks, Bob
__________________
_____________________________________________ Audemars Piguet - Blancpain - Damasko - Grand Seiko - Rolex |
15 April 2013, 12:14 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD
Posts: 34
|
That's a nice AT. Love the clean dial.
I had the JLC for a couple of months before I sold it. The pros: 1. Rubber bracelet was very comfortable. I wore it while touring on my bike and it was fine. 2. Blue lume is bright. Cons: 1. Not that easy to read at a glance. Either the hour markers are too big or hour hand is too small. 2. The bezel doesn't rotate as well as a Sub. There seems to be a bit more play with the JLC. As far as size, it doesn't look big on the wrist which is probably due to the black rubber bracelet. |
15 April 2013, 12:53 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,722
|
I vote for the AP diver. I find that it's so comfortable that it wears much better than my DSSD or PO (now sold). I find it to wear as comfortable as the 42mm IWC aquatimer divers that i prefer much more than the new ones. I will add that while I have no problem using the SD or DSSD as a tool dive watch the AP diver gets used more for pool or light swimming activity. No doubt it could hold up to consistent dives but every bump or scratch hurts a little more.
|
15 April 2013, 12:57 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
|
I have the older Omega Planet Ocean with the 2500 movement and it really is a fantastic watch. Here are the pros and cons as I see it.
Pros: Very well built - feels rock solid. Super lume. Great price. Relatively thin. Unbelievably accurate movement. Great feel on the wrist - nicely balanced. Strong clasp. Cons No micro adjustment. If you can get over the helium valve - it should be on your shortlist. Cheers.
__________________
Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko |
15 April 2013, 01:08 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Well, um....
Watch: Depends on the day
Posts: 149
|
Doesn't UN make a 40 mm marine still? There's always the 40 mm Pam 48. I'd even suggest you consider finding a good example of the prior model Aquatimer 2000, which was 42 mm. A little lower rung but what about a Tudor Pelagos, I believe also 42mm.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2 |
15 April 2013, 01:30 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
|
Most Omegas wear a little smaller than stated. This is because the crown side of the case sticks out farther to act as crown guards, but because it is technically part of the case it gets included in the measurement. The bezels are usually around 1.5mm smaller than the stated size. All this to say that the mid size PO has a bezel around 40.5 - 41mm.
|
15 April 2013, 02:00 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50
Posts: 1,966
|
I really fancy the new GP hawk. As a hobbist knife maker the grinds on the case are just awesome and the design looks better every time I see it. If you're considering one on rubber then it's worth a look.
|
15 April 2013, 06:55 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,443
|
i can speak for the PO
PO cons: thick heavy pros: solid beautiful dive watch I think the sub is what you are looking for its a solid modest sized diver. cant go wrong with that other than it can get a little boring. |
15 April 2013, 07:50 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bob
Location: NJ
Watch: Less each year...
Posts: 464
|
Un
Quote:
|
|
15 April 2013, 07:54 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bob
Location: NJ
Watch: Less each year...
Posts: 464
|
Thickness
The GP may look great as you say but it is 17.1 mm thick which causes me pause.
|
15 April 2013, 09:13 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: Australia
Posts: 98
|
Have you considered the Seamaster Aqua Terra, rather than the Planet Ocean? The AT doesn't have the helium valve (and as such is rated to 150m / 500ft, compared to the PO at 600m / 2000ft). Is a high depth rating a concern? How deep do you dive?
Also, potentially consider the no-date Sub. The legibility of the time without a cyclops and date aperture would be a higher concern while diving I'd imagine. |
16 April 2013, 01:11 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 30
|
Have you considered JLC's Deep Sea Vintage and Deep Sea? Both have chronographs and are WR to only 100M, but that should be sufficient for recreational dives. The latter is even ISO certified. Movements in both are exceptional and size-wise they're at or below your limit. And because they haven't engaged in the WR arms-race, they're not overly thick (which for me is a greater concern than the width).
Neither one, unfortunately, has a date function, which may be a deal-breaker. |
16 April 2013, 01:19 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Out of that list AP first, PO secound.
|
16 April 2013, 02:33 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
|
Out of curiousity, where do you get all the pics and specs of the various watches?
|
16 April 2013, 02:45 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: HR
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: -ing Barts.
Posts: 4,244
|
AP got my vote. comfort, great finishing , looking good :)
|
16 April 2013, 04:19 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bob
Location: NJ
Watch: Less each year...
Posts: 464
|
|
16 April 2013, 04:20 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bob
Location: NJ
Watch: Less each year...
Posts: 464
|
Quote:
|
|
16 April 2013, 04:21 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bob
Location: NJ
Watch: Less each year...
Posts: 464
|
Quote:
|
|
16 April 2013, 04:24 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bob
Location: NJ
Watch: Less each year...
Posts: 464
|
Here are some more...
|
16 April 2013, 04:26 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
|
|
16 April 2013, 12:49 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
Fifty Fathom Dark Knight is what I would pick to dive with out of all the watches listed, and I bought one to prove it:
Love that watch. Anytime I have to do anything rugged, I bring that watch and don't have to worry about it the least bit... |
16 April 2013, 01:39 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
I would first suggest you try the Aquatimer on the rubber bracelet. The difference in wear-ability is considerable. Also, it looks tight on your wrist. Should be able to get a finger between bracelet and wrist, yet tight enough to not slide around. The watch should be worn just above the wrist knuckle.
It would be good to know if you are really going to go diving. I have owned the JLC Navy Seals and was always concerned about scratching the ceramic bezel insert. Watch is comfortable. I have had on both the rubber strap and the articulated bracelet. I never scratched up the bracelet, but I was careful. You are right to be concerned. It is not like you can brush it up like a Submariner bracelet. The AP is incredible, but that is a whole new level of watch. I have not owned, but I do own the ROO and wear on bracelet. It is comfortable, but not as comfortable as a watch can or should be. It would be significantly more comfortable on the rubber bracelet. The Rolex is a real diver in it has a dive extension built into the bracelet so it can actually be used for diving. It is the safe choice. The Planet Ocean is a nice watch, but well it is an Omega (yawn)...not that there is anything wrong with that, and it is fat. You may consider something in the 42mm size. The first watch that comes to mind that is a great diver is the IWC Aquatimer 3536 that is discontinued. Also the older Girard Perregaux Seahawk is a nice watch in 42mm.
__________________
|
16 April 2013, 06:11 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
|
Omega is just coming out with a new PO Ti in 42 that would be very comfortable due to reduced weight...although it will be available probably rather later ina few months cuz thats how basel models normally come out, but i would suggest you definitely try that out too
|
16 April 2013, 08:30 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Hard to beat the FF
__________________
|
16 April 2013, 10:36 PM | #25 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,476
|
The AP is a really sexy looking watch
|
16 April 2013, 11:46 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: planet
Posts: 1,517
|
AP or BP for me.
__________________
Dream the impossible, and make it possible! |
17 April 2013, 10:26 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Joe
Location: NJ
Watch: 16613ln
Posts: 627
|
Pam 24 gets the vote.. Looks awesome, and with the rubber band makes a great diver..
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.