ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 July 2018, 08:44 PM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
|
Thanks for the feedback, guys. I bought my SD43 in May 2017 !
By "better" movement I meant more advanced (better accuracy, more shock resistance, protection against magnetism, power reserve). I don't see it as a threat to the Sub anymore, its size and height is a hindrance to many folks. Personally though I find the SD43 more satisfying on the wrist, prefer its matte textured dial (almost tropical) and the tapered lugs. |
20 July 2018, 11:20 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller 43mm
Posts: 13
|
I resisted buying a submariner for 10 years as I was always underwhelmed by the size and bracelet compared to my own 42-44mm pieces.
The moment the SD43 was announced at Basel, I knew it was the one! So on a personal note, the SD43 has had an impact on Sub sales … no matter how microscopic my purchase on the grand scale of things. |
21 July 2018, 12:08 AM | #63 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,673
|
I’m still stuck in the past and can’t get over the “bigger is better” speed bump.
If the movement fits in a 36mm case - or max. 40mm case - I don’t need the bulk of the taller, wider, heavier 43’s. Had the old 16600 like Peter and didn’t see a need for bigger myself. It’s gone but the 16613 I now have fits just fine. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
21 July 2018, 12:13 AM | #64 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 131
|
Quote:
How is that an impact on Sub sales...? You never bought one in 10yrs, you would never have bought one. New model comes along and you buy that one... Not an impact on Sub sales at all. |
|
21 July 2018, 12:24 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
|
No....
Not everyone likes the 43mm you know. Modern day mid size is the max for me. 38-41mm |
21 July 2018, 12:28 AM | #66 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller 43mm
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
I was half taken by my mates ceramic Sub with better bracelet and Glidelock … although I admit I was leaning towards the SD4000 instead. For what it's worth I think the Deep Sea will suffer more than the Sub in terms of lost sales. |
|
21 July 2018, 12:33 AM | #67 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
|
Quote:
I couldn’t agree more with you |
|
21 July 2018, 12:35 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Tim
Location: Blue Mountains
Watch: n the clouds go by
Posts: 121
|
I hate to bring up the scarcity card, but, I think availability of either model will be a stronger influence of what sales will be. If it takes six months to get a Sub, a readily available Sea Dweller becomes much more appealing and vice versa.
|
21 July 2018, 12:43 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Tony
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: RG Skydweller
Posts: 1,469
|
I have a 7.5" wrist, so, for me, the SD43 was the better choice (although I also own and love a bluesy sub), but I'm in the minority.
|
21 July 2018, 12:45 AM | #70 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northwest
Posts: 1,336
|
You've got to be kidding...
|
28 October 2018, 08:28 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 8,800
|
Completely different watch, different price point, different wrists benefit from each differently. SD be way too much (price, size, depth rating) for some.
Just different watches that do different things. The sub is an icon that’s not going anywhere. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 October 2018, 08:31 AM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: NYC
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 1,541
|
No. The 40mm Sub is the classic and has better thickness for fitting under shirts. The Sea Dweller and DSSD are more casual watches meant for casual wear. I think Deep Seas look ridiculous paired with suits. There is really no need for a watch that thick that will never be used for its intended purpose other than for collection.
__________________
Rolex 116710 BLNR Rolex Day Date 118238 Champagne/Batons |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.