ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 January 2013, 03:50 AM | #121 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 2
|
Have you tried on the Pelagos? I recently went to Europe and was on a mission to get one. When I tried it on, I instantly decided against it. I was worried about the titanium look, but all the pictures I have seen made it look nicer than most titanium watches I've tried on. But when I actually put it on, it only took me about 3 seconds to decide that the Pelagos was not for me.
|
8 January 2013, 01:00 PM | #122 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 2
|
Sub! I recently was in Zurich and was on a mission to check out the new Tudors, especially the Pelagos. I tried it on and instantly knew it wasn't the watch for me. If it were stainless, I probably would have bought it on the spot. But the titanium is just not a nice look in my opinion.
|
9 February 2013, 11:30 AM | #123 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 30
|
This is the point, I am as well. LNIB Pelagos or 10yr old 14060M????
|
9 February 2013, 11:48 AM | #125 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Clarita CA
Posts: 1,028
|
Sub C IMHO...
|
9 February 2013, 12:09 PM | #126 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,634
|
The Pelagos. We need to come up with a nickname for it.
The Sub Slayer That's not gonna make me very popular round here. |
9 February 2013, 09:22 PM | #127 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,148
|
Quote:
How about the Torpedo, as it's capable of sinking a Sub? |
|
9 February 2013, 11:01 PM | #128 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,634
|
|
10 February 2013, 12:37 AM | #129 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
The Pelagos is technically superior to the SubC. "Better" is a problematic word as it's relative to each person's definition of what constitutes better. The Pelagos is duller finish, more purposeful, more legible, goes deeper, brighter... a superior dive watch. So yes, in my book it's "better".
|
17 January 2016, 08:30 AM | #130 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Seattle
Watch: Omega Speedmaster
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
|
|
17 January 2016, 08:57 AM | #131 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Tom
Location: New Jersey
Watch: Sub Date
Posts: 318
|
Pelagos
|
17 January 2016, 09:13 AM | #132 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NZ
Watch: ♛ 16600
Posts: 98
|
it's from 2012
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.