ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 September 2022, 10:22 AM | #61 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: Chris
Location: USA
Watch: ingMe,WatchingYou.
Posts: 1,462
|
Quote:
Actually I saw your reply in context so I know who you were really replying to. But a little humor is always good these days |
|
20 September 2022, 02:30 PM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Asia
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
I suppose the only flaw, well two flaws, are that it could be 1mm smaller at 38mm it will be perfect, and that the beautiful movement could really use an internal angle instead of rounded lines that screams corner cutting |
|
20 September 2022, 09:37 PM | #63 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,238
|
Quote:
|
|
25 October 2023, 01:12 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 2,176
|
I'm late to this thread and a lot of good things have been said, but I thought I'd offer my view to complement or contradict them.
As to what you write about Lange not making a profit, I've heard it said that Cartier (both their jewelry and their watches) finance the other Richemont brands, and I don't doubt this. That written, I don't think Lange or any other Richemont brands are operating at a loss, but I doubt they're making large profits. My first really nice dress watch was an 1815 36mm in yellow gold followed shortly by a Patek 3119 in yellow gold, both watches I'd always liked. I replaced the 3119 when the 5119 came out, as I liked the larger size (34mm v. 36mm), the elongated Roman numerals, and the display caseback. The only downside of the 5119 is that the movement is too small for the case. Nevertheless, I still own it, along with the 1815. The 6119 with its new movement rectifies this, although I don't think the dial, bezel, indices, and hands of the 6119 are as harmonious as on the 3119 or 5119. I've tried the 6119 on several times and have considered it, but because it's larger, very flat, and I have small wrists, it just doesn't look right on my 6.7" wrist. If one has larger wrists, I could see it working, but the 39mm 1815 Up/Down works better on smaller wrists like mine. I currently own three Langes (all 1815s in colored gold), and two Pateks, also in colored gold. I only own one white gold watch (a JLC), simply because that's the only metal that the complication and dial combo I wanted was offered in. I personally prefer my gold watches to be colored and if I want white metal, I prefer steel or platinum. That written, white gold is a lot more versatile than colored gold and if the watch you want only comes in white gold and not steel or platinum, then get the white gold. Between the two watches you show, I will say that the 6119 is a lot more dressy due to the hobnail bezel. I personally love this bezel, but I will admit that I think it's quite dressy and I usually only wear my 5119 with a suit while I wear my 1815s with smooth bezels with suits but also with khakis and Oxford shirts. White gold will dress down both watches more. As for the cases, Patek, like Vacheron, makes far more elegant and thin cases and they are made in-house. Lange basically makes (or has made for them) the same case for all their watches. It's a fine case of superb quality, albeit a bit boring, but the movement is where Lange really shines. All Pateks are hand finished but Langes are more hand finished (except on the Patek rattrapantes and minute repeaters) and it shows under magnification. How much this matters is up to you. I will say that I find Langes to be far better values than Pateks. In summary, I don't think you'd go wrong with either watch, but I could imagine the 1815 Up/Down being worn in a lot more scenarios than the 6119. Regardless, you really need to try both on and see which speaks to you more. Cheers! |
25 October 2023, 02:02 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,176
|
I vote 1815 here.
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
25 October 2023, 05:47 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,238
|
|
25 October 2023, 10:42 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Louis
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: PP 5131R
Posts: 4,786
|
This type of comparison isn’t an academic one. I have tried on Langes many times and never pulled the trigger on one, one stupidly passing on a new 1815 chrono almost at dealer cost.
You need to try the pieces on your wrist. |
26 October 2023, 12:39 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 775
|
No comment on better but they are both gorgeous watches.
|
26 October 2023, 01:02 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,176
|
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.