The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 November 2014, 03:36 PM   #1
rouxeny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Maui
Posts: 686
Interested in a Panerai - questions.

I own a Rolex blue YM (116622) and am possibly interested in a Panerai, just to add something different.

I'd like a Luminor with a date (Ideally with date bubble), an in-house movement, and a display back. From what I can tell on the website, that does not exist?

The 1950's luminor does not have a date bubble and the newer versions don't seem to have a display back?
rouxeny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2014, 04:11 PM   #2
Lastrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 27
Compare the 104 and 312. The 104 has the luminor case and is thinner. The ETA movement is COSC certified. Mine is running -0.5 seconds per day. It also has the sausage dial as opposed to the sandwich dial.
Lastrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2014, 08:58 PM   #3
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,525
Panerai seems to be moving away from the bubble, with none of their inhouse offerings featuring one. Moreover, for many, it's a polarizing issue on a Panerai, with "Paneristi" generally not being in favor of it (complicates design, is totally unrelated to the brand's history).

That being said, my only Panerai has a date bubble. I like it for the magnification, I like that it is inverted, so that it doesn't have the "Rolex" look, and I like the balance it gives to the dial across from the seconds dial.

As for OP's ETA models, the movements are top grade ETA modified by Panerai and easily serviced by any quality technician, and they are time-tested and solid. Get 'em while you can.

So...in my opinion, get what you like and don't worry about an "inhouse" label or if some will frown about the bubble.... I know I smile when I look at my watch.

Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2014, 11:22 PM   #4
Aventura
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lastrolex View Post
Compare the 104 and 312. The 104 has the luminor case and is thinner. The ETA movement is COSC certified. Mine is running -0.5 seconds per day. It also has the sausage dial as opposed to the sandwich dial.
Hi Lastrolex
You say that the housing 104 is thinner than the 312? Not that the two models are Luminor?
Thanks.
Aventura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2014, 12:52 AM   #5
rouxeny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Maui
Posts: 686
Sorry, I don't know what sausage vs sandwich dial means.

Is the general difference between the 1950's case and Luminor the thickness? I've seen some Paneraimwith nice domes. Are those acrylic, and are those older, or current models?
rouxeny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2014, 04:19 PM   #6
Mastergreenhand
"TRF" Member
 
Mastergreenhand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Chi-town
Watch: Starbucks
Posts: 1,170
Sausage dial - check out the 000
Sandwich dial - check out the 112

The 1950s cases are taller because the auto movement p.9000 is very thick.
__________________
Starbucks, Speedmaster Professional, PAM 212
Mastergreenhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2014, 08:36 AM   #7
flatmad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Plano, Texas
Watch: 116500
Posts: 167
I found the date magnifier on my 104 hard to read some times.. 312 gets my votes.
flatmad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2014, 01:14 PM   #8
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aventura View Post
Hi Lastrolex
You say that the housing 104 is thinner than the 312? Not that the two models are Luminor?
Thanks.
They are both Luminors, but the 104 has the 'Bettarini' case (same as the 111, 005, etc) whereas the 312 has the '1950' case (same as the 320, 233, etc)
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.