ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dman · 25 November 2005, 03:31 PM

For some reason the Ti just looks "fuzzy" as JJ put it. He was right, I am not sure why though. I took these tonight with a little more light and a bit less sharpness. Still not where I want them to be, but a little better.

JJ Irani · 25 November 2005, 03:34 PM

Good effort, but you do get what I'm trying to say. Just take a look at that IWC and Swiss Made printing....see how blurry it is. WHY? Why can't you reproduce the same superb pics with this watch which you did with the others?

Have a look at your lens....maybe it needs a good clean with a soft cloth. Just a suggestion! I am disappointed because I love IWC and want to see some really good pics of that cracker!

JJ Irani · 25 November 2005, 04:03 PM

Hey Daren,

Avoid angles with this watch....try a dead on shot and let's see how it comes out? Good luck!!

25 November 2005, 11:36 PM

Daren, they do look better than before, but on the top shot, the depth of focus may be too shallow because the top half of the dial is in focus, the bottom isn't.

But you can really see the 'flecks' in the Ti, and that's probably why the case doesn't pop. That's the nature of titanium, I'm guessing.

What if you set the aperature as small as possible to increase the depth of field?

Goodwatch · 26 November 2005, 08:22 AM

Oviously that watch is no good. So just give it to me, I'll take the pictures and mail them to you. Deal?

25 November 2005, 03:31 PM	#1
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,583	Still trying to "catch" this bugger.... For some reason the Ti just looks "fuzzy" as JJ put it. He was right, I am not sure why though. I took these tonight with a little more light and a bit less sharpness. Still not where I want them to be, but a little better. __________________ You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.

25 November 2005, 03:34 PM	#2
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,320	Good effort, but you do get what I'm trying to say. Just take a look at that IWC and Swiss Made printing....see how blurry it is. WHY? Why can't you reproduce the same superb pics with this watch which you did with the others? Have a look at your lens....maybe it needs a good clean with a soft cloth. Just a suggestion! I am disappointed because I love IWC and want to see some really good pics of that cracker! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

25 November 2005, 04:03 PM	#3
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,320	Hey Daren, Avoid angles with this watch....try a dead on shot and let's see how it comes out? Good luck!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

26 November 2005, 08:22 AM	#5
Goodwatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Real Name: Frans ® Location: Rotterdam Watch: the sunrise... Posts: 10,230	Oviously that watch is no good. So just give it to me, I'll take the pictures and mail them to you. Deal? __________________ Member# 127

25 November 2005, 11:36 PM	#4
Atomic Guest Posts: n/a	Daren, they do look better than before, but on the top shot, the depth of focus may be too shallow because the top half of the dial is in focus, the bottom isn't. But you can really see the 'flecks' in the Ti, and that's probably why the case doesn't pop. That's the nature of titanium, I'm guessing. What if you set the aperature as small as possible to increase the depth of field?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)