|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 September 2013, 06:11 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 93
|
Which one should I get-1st Rolex???
I am really torn between the 116710 BLNR and 216570 Explorer II Black! I am looking for a watch that can be dressed up/down based on what I am doing. I only want one watch. I wear a suit to work, but go very casual on weekends and my time off. Enjoy all outdoor sports, coaching my children, hunting and fishing. Personally, I like both models very much, but am slighlty leaning towards the Explorer II due to it being less flashy, and seemingly more versatile for my lifestyle. Any advice or suggestions on which watch I should purchase is greatly appreciated...
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 06:19 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 51
|
I just bought the new black and blue GMT today ! Very masculine and I love the blue. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 06:34 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Tony
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, JLC...
Posts: 631
|
Look at a 16610, it is the model before the ceramic bezel and is less flashy than the new Submariners, but a great watch. (and it will save you some money as well)
__________________
Kind Regards, Tony. |
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 06:42 AM
|
#4 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,222
|
Both can handle your lifestyle.
I like the idea of the Exp2 though. A little more robust, brushed bracelet, fixed bezel and I think it can pair with a suit just fine. |
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 06:44 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 365
|
The 116710 BLNR is the way to go. Wearing the Exp II with a suit looks a little out of place to me.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 06:45 AM
|
#6 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
I'd get the 216570
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 06:48 AM
|
#7 |
|
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 DATE-JUST41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 49,604
|
from what you said........ i'd get 216570 Explorer II Black then.... there are some great reviews, you can check them out so you will know which one you want it better ...........Good luck with your decision!:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=221282 https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=250796 https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=244839
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 06:48 AM
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: PIttsburgh
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 453
|
I would suggest for you to consider Explorer 214270 as well.
incredible watch. i had it, i sold it, i regret it. |
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 06:49 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
Sub, GMT, EXP in that order for me
__________________
 AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 06:50 AM
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 365
|
Explorer 214270 is a GREAT watch if you can get past the short minute hand...
I couldn't, otherwise it would be on my wrist. |
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 07:47 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 93
|
Thanks guys for the replies! The reviews and suggestions definitely give me more to think about before deciding on my choice of watch...
I will give this a little time and see if one of these 2 watches really grows on me! Thanks again... |
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 10:21 AM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 484
|
If I was to get an Explorer II, it would be the older version 16570. If black face, it would be the GMT II BLNR.
__________________
GMT IIc, Exp II, Speedy Pro If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space. |
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 10:23 AM
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Gmt ii
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 10:30 AM
|
#14 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,179
|
gmtiic, blue and black.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 10:30 AM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: jimmy
Location: id
Watch: baby
Posts: 335
|
The blnr should be a good choice
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 10:40 AM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,187
|
Expl 2
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 10:53 AM
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,113
|
sounds like te exp2 is the watch for you.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 10:54 AM
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mass
Watch: 116520,hulk
Posts: 225
|
I would go GMt blnr.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 11:56 AM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
|
Both fantastic pieces, although I think I would lean towards the EXP if for no other reason than there are so many good deals to be had, while the BLNR is still commanding prices close to retail. Heck, if you get tired of the EXP, by that time the hype may have died down on the BLNR.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 12:21 PM
|
#20 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
You could never go wrong with a Sub or GMTII. Both are great for all occasions, dressed up or down.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 12:24 PM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I'd get the Explorer. But, the choice is yours.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 12:27 PM
|
#22 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: McDonough, GA
Watch: 116710BLNR 15400ST
Posts: 303
|
You may as well get both now as you will more than likely have them both eventually anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 12:30 PM
|
#23 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,623
|
Forget about all the others. I just took delivery today on my new Explorer I, had it been my first Rolex, I might not be on my third ! !
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 12:46 PM
|
#24 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: None of ya #@!
Location: Somewhere
Watch: Many! 116718 GOLD
Posts: 2,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 01:27 PM
|
#25 | |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hoth
Posts: 1,242
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 01:31 PM
|
#26 |
|
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
|
Expl.II gets my vote.
Less fiddly bezel and won't chip either... Functionally similar.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 01:31 PM
|
#27 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: PIttsburgh
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 453
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 02:42 PM
|
#28 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: New City
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 169
|
Both are nice watches, but my vote goes to the Exp II Black - the Explorer II 42mm has a GMT hand that's easier to see! I have one and wear it most days, while my GMT IIc TT sleeps in the drawers. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 05:07 PM
|
#29 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
If you need to dress up and down then the GMT II BLNR; the Exp II is more of a tool watch. Personally, I am a dress down sort of guy so I would choose the Exp II.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
6 September 2013, 05:10 PM
|
#30 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Alex
Location: Europe
Watch: AP
Posts: 5,252
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
