The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 March 2017, 03:02 PM   #1
time1193
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Seoul
Posts: 8
Reasonably price for this 16013?

Hi guys, its my first time posting here. I know this question has been asked multiple times and it ranges somewhere between 2200-3000. My dealer is asking for 3000. I noticed that the dial is somewhat unique(definitely have seen it around but certainly not common). Also the dealer told me the watch has never been polished which i am not too sure about. Your feedback on the condition of this watch and price will be appreciated.

The deal structure: my iwc portofino+$1000 or $3000
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4040.jpg (83.8 KB, 545 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4043.jpg (98.8 KB, 551 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4042.jpg (103.4 KB, 547 views)
time1193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 12:43 AM   #2
time1193
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Seoul
Posts: 8
anyone?
time1193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 01:12 AM   #3
lpestre
2024 Pledge Member
 
lpestre's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal/Paris
Posts: 1,262
Hello,

For me this is too expensive. First i don't know if it's the pictures or me but look like a piepan dial, so it would be a 1601.

But considering that i'm wrong, 3000 is too expensive, assuming you don't talk about a full full set with service card of every 5 years, no strecth jubilee etc.

Also when you look at the watch it's in perfect state no airlines, so execpt it was a safe queen stored in a safe for many years, the watch has been polished.

After the watch looks fine to me, but a bit overpriced.

cheers
lpestre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 02:27 AM   #4
GGGMT
2024 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 7,963
Overpriced by about 15%. But you don't know when it was last serviced. Here's mine: paid less than $3k about 2 years ago -- 1601, ~1967, mint, serviced and full B&P. I think it's OK to overpay somewhat for an amazing piece from an impeccable seller.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 02:35 AM   #5
datejust24
"TRF" Member
 
datejust24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
First off ...stating that the piece in question has been polished is a bit ridiculous considering the age of the piece...with that being said the lugs still look to have plenty of meat left on them...is $3k a bit steep...yes I would say so but if you would get it for $2500-$2800 I think you'd be doing ok
datejust24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 06:32 AM   #6
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
The nice ones are bringing more money. Fat lugs, corrosion free cases, good bracelets and a fresh service can bring that or better. B&P even more. New world gentlemen. :)
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 06:40 AM   #7
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,157
$3000 from a dealer is not over-priced. $3000 from anprivate seller is a decent price too. Nice watches are always priced at the higher end of the spectrum.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 06:54 AM   #8
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,152
Reasonably price for this 16013?

Reasonable price not spectacular


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 06:54 AM   #9
Lordofrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Lordofrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,690
$2500-$2800 would be the right price range.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Panerai PAM 359
Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR


Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich
Lordofrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 09:42 AM   #10
time1193
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Seoul
Posts: 8
Thank you so much for the replies guys! So im assuming if the movement is 3035 itd be 16013 and if its not itd be 1601. Im buying this from a watchsmith who specializes in servicing rolex watches in Korea. The bracelet was in a very good condition which i was very happy about. 3000 does seem relatively expensive but it does include ttwo year service guarantee from the watchsmith. One more question tho...what are the service restrictions from Rolex if i have no box and paper??
time1193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 10:15 AM   #11
time1193
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Seoul
Posts: 8
Current watch

These are some photos of my iwc in case you guys wanted to know :)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4062.jpg (66.3 KB, 436 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4044.jpg (62.6 KB, 438 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4001.jpg (91.0 KB, 438 views)
time1193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 10:43 AM   #12
onthedial
"TRF" Member
 
onthedial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
@time1193
You'd be upgrading from your IWC, so if you don't foresee having any regrets being without it, I'd make the trade.
__________
Instagram: @onthedial
onthedial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 11:22 AM   #13
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
No restrictions from Rolex on service. They check for non-factory parts and the serial number to see if it's stolen and that's about it.
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 11:40 AM   #14
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
I feel like $3k is high retail.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 12:15 PM   #15
jmiicustomz
"TRF" Member
 
jmiicustomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: John
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1953 pre explorer
Posts: 2,758
Not a bad deal if you trust the dealer. It's more than you would pay here on TRF but cheaper than some high end boutique jewelers. It's fair.

To know the future is to be trapped by it
jmiicustomz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2017, 01:45 PM   #16
GGGMT
2024 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 7,963
You can do better in my view. .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2017, 10:35 AM   #17
time1193
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Seoul
Posts: 8
Got my first rolex!!

Thank you again for the replies and warm welcome to the community. I ended up getting my first rolex by upgrading it from my old iwc for approx. $900. Im loving the watch and it goes well with the wedding band haha. Kind of wish i got the ring in YG/PT instead of RG/PT.

Also special thanks to onthedial for the advice!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4106.jpg (71.4 KB, 375 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4091.jpg (80.2 KB, 378 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4100.jpg (65.9 KB, 378 views)
time1193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2017, 12:30 PM   #18
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
Congrats! Looks great!
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2017, 12:32 PM   #19
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,157
Congratulations.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2017, 05:47 AM   #20
GGGMT
2024 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 7,963
Welcome and congrats! great feeling, no?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2017, 09:35 AM   #21
time1193
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Seoul
Posts: 8
Haha yupp feels great! Btw whats the price difference for 14k and 18k model for 16013? Is it significant?
time1193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2017, 10:03 AM   #22
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by time1193 View Post
Haha yupp feels great! Btw whats the price difference for 14k and 18k model for 16013? Is it significant?
All 5 digit refs are 18k, the four digit refs were 14k. There were 14 and 18k even some early 9k all gold 16XX. I'm not sure if any solid 16XXX were offered in 14k but I doubt it.
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2017, 10:24 AM   #23
time1193
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Seoul
Posts: 8
Ah i see. So it says on the band H14 which means its 14k but i believe the bezel is 18k as i can see slight difference in color between the bezel and the bracelet. I checked the movement and it says 3035. Didnt rolex put 3035 into datejust starting 5 digit models? Im a bit confused here. I checked the forum and it says some 16013 were 14k. Not that it matters to me at the moment since im so much in love with this piece but thought itd be nice to know.
time1193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2017, 01:55 PM   #24
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
You have an older bracelet that didn't come with your watch, it's from an earlier 16XX series watch. Your watch is a 16013 TT that has a 3035 movement. It would have come with an 18k bezel, 18k capped crown and 18k bracelet links.

you might ask your seller for the correct bracelet, you paid top dollar and should get a correct watch. You kinda got screwed. Try to get a series of pics of every angle of the bracelet and clasp. Looking at the pics above there is a possibility the links are aftermarket.
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2017, 04:37 PM   #25
time1193
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Seoul
Posts: 8
Bracelet pics

So I gave the dealer a call asking about the ref and the bracelet. He told me that the watch is 16013 and added that the earlier 16013 models were produced in 14k and later on got switched to 18k. He also said that the bezel and gold part of the watch head is also 14k. Does anyone have any insight into this subject matter?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4110.jpg (78.5 KB, 286 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4111.jpg (68.5 KB, 287 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4112.jpg (80.2 KB, 287 views)
time1193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 06:44 AM   #26
propositionjoe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by time1193 View Post
So I gave the dealer a call asking about the ref and the bracelet. He told me that the watch is 16013 and added that the earlier 16013 models were produced in 14k and later on got switched to 18k. He also said that the bezel and gold part of the watch head is also 14k. Does anyone have any insight into this subject matter?
Hey based on my knowledge. He is 100% right. It means that your watch should date to 1980-1982. The guy above probably caused a spike in your blood pressure that may have taken a week or so off your life.
propositionjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 07:01 AM   #27
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
Yes the dealer is correct, early 5 digit were 14k trim. The clasp is marked 14k as well. nice watch.

The moral to this tale: always listen to Springer; not me. :)
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2017, 10:41 AM   #28
janice&fred
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: janice
Location: St.Petersburg Fl
Watch: all of them!
Posts: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthedial View Post
@time1193
You'd be upgrading from your IWC, so if you don't foresee having any regrets being without it, I'd make the trade.
__________
Instagram: @onthedial

i agree 100%. i would snap on that trade deal before the guy changes his mind. that datejust looks gorgeous and that IWC is one of the most boring low-end models they ever made.

edit: i didn't bother to read the entire thread and see you did indeed do the smart thing and grab the deal. that datejust is a stunner!
janice&fred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2017, 05:20 AM   #29
circles
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: GMT-6
Posts: 185
A 16013 can have a pie-pan dial? Really?
circles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2017, 05:50 AM   #30
Richard Carver
"TRF" Member
 
Richard Carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by circles View Post
A 16013 can have a pie-pan dial? Really?
Maybe it's the dial color but that isn't a piepan.
Richard Carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.