ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 April 2017, 06:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: & learn
Posts: 1,013
|
Submariner or GMT if you had to choose one
Submariner or GMT if you had to choose one and why?
Submariner was my first Rolex and I chose the sub over the GMT because it had a less busy Bezel which I preferred. |
19 April 2017, 06:52 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Me & Papa
Location: Echo
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 3,428
|
I have both but if I ever had to choose only one, it would have be to the Submariner because of the BCLs and the Glidelock.
|
19 April 2017, 06:53 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Rob
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 126660,126600
Posts: 1,324
|
If I'm picking one it would be the sub.The sub is just pure Rolex to me.Seems more sporty and rugged which is me and I don't travel much.
|
19 April 2017, 06:53 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: WA
Watch: Batman, X-33
Posts: 172
|
GMT, because I'm an aviator and not a submariner!
|
19 April 2017, 06:55 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,870
|
I much prefer the GMT complication. It's much more useful to me. However I love the Glidelock clasp.
|
19 April 2017, 06:55 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Abu Dhabi/Manila
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Tag.
Posts: 253
|
Submariner. As a tool watch it suffice my needs. I can measure the lapsed time using the bezel at my work.
I don't travel a lot, so I don't need a GMT complication. |
19 April 2017, 06:56 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Clermont, FL
Watch: BLRO
Posts: 282
|
The GMT every time for me, as it has a complication that I find useful on a regular basis. The Sub, since I stopped diving, does not.
|
19 April 2017, 06:57 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Vetracer
Location: London
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 577
|
If I had neither, I'd go with the Sub; it's a classic and as you mentioned the dial is less busy. I couldn't live without a GMT function watch whilst travelling though so maybe get both or choose a GMT from another brand in the future.
|
19 April 2017, 06:57 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK
Watch: blro,daytc,lv,blnr
Posts: 233
|
GMT is very useful when travelling, photograph perspectives make it look busier, in real life I find them similar, platinum numbers look great.
Sub is a classic, full brush with glidelock feels more utilarian than bling of GMT. So no wrong choice, so close between them and over time many would get both Also might come down to colours, green vs black and blue, or just plain black, or perhaps future black red GMT, those details might make your mind up |
19 April 2017, 06:57 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Silicon Valley
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,182
|
Both great but I would pick GMT
|
19 April 2017, 06:59 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,071
|
GMT for me, too. I like it more, particularly the pre-ceramic with red GMT hand; and it is much more functional. The rotating bezel allows for two time zones, or military time, or count down chronometer. And it's lighter and thinner than the sub.
|
19 April 2017, 07:06 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,276
|
GMT is always the answer.
I'm writing this so often I might change my signature.
__________________
. The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings... ——————————————————————————————————— . 16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. BB58. GMW-B5000D. |
19 April 2017, 07:07 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 722
|
I have and like both but if I only had one it would be the Sub.
|
19 April 2017, 07:08 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Over Yonder
Watch: d-d40wg
Posts: 744
|
If I had to choose between letting either my GMT or Sub go-an extremely difficult choice-I'd hang on to the 14060M.
__________________
Orbis non sufficit |
19 April 2017, 07:10 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 378
|
Definitely the sub (if you mean sub date). It is hands down the best one-piece-collection anyone could own because anyone can wear it, anywhere, with anything...not mention it's beautiful and a total icon of horology.
|
19 April 2017, 07:12 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 5,084
|
I would not be able to decide, though I do favor the GMT. Fortunately, I do not have, too.
__________________
“Anyone can be sarcastic; it takes intelligence to solve a problem!” |
19 April 2017, 07:13 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: SNK
Location: Texas
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 19
|
GMT for me. I think it's a nice balance of versatility, features, and aesthetics. Mostly the GMT IIc as I think the larger case keeps its sporty but the PCLs and overall look of the ceramic give it a dressy edge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 April 2017, 07:15 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
|
Sub. I think the timing bezel is one of, if not the most, useful functions on a sports watch.
|
19 April 2017, 07:31 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,125
|
I did have to choose one, and I chose the GMT. While a lot of people above have stated the GMT "because I travel" or chosen the sub "because I don't travel", my reason was not travel but because I work across time zones. Being able to keep track of head office time at a glance was a great feature and because of that complication I chose the GMT.
That said, A few years later I picked up a sub to go with it Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 April 2017, 07:39 AM | #20 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,479
|
For me, the GMT is the winner. I love my Submariner's, but the GMT is more functional, IMO.
|
19 April 2017, 07:43 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
|
I made that choice recently and the GMT BLNR won hands down. The only downside is that the GMT seriously diminishes the desire for a Sub.
|
19 April 2017, 07:50 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: None
Posts: 646
|
Preceramic GMTs vs sub is close call but sub takes it
|
19 April 2017, 07:54 AM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Jeff
Location: CA
Watch: me disappear into
Posts: 1,767
|
tough choice..:)
SUb would be for me...:)
__________________
*** Be inner, be peaceful *** |
19 April 2017, 07:55 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,356
|
I'd pick the GMT, I think the water resistance is far more than I need on a GMT for normal life (not diving deeper than 100m anytime soon) and I find the complication useful for international travels/keeping track of different time zones for international business.
|
19 April 2017, 07:57 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Miami *305*
Watch: 114060/116710BLNR
Posts: 903
|
I have both a 114060 and BLNR. Lately it's been equal wrist time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 April 2017, 08:02 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Joe
Location: CONUS
Watch: Rolex 116710
Posts: 994
|
Could never choose so the only option was to get both!!
|
19 April 2017, 08:03 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Socal/LA
Watch: 116610LN Ceramic
Posts: 3,214
|
I have both a subC and BLNR. But a sub is always a must keep in a collection.
__________________
♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021 |
19 April 2017, 08:15 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Don't need the time zone feature so easy for me, sub
__________________
|
19 April 2017, 08:28 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Gmt
__________________
|
19 April 2017, 09:33 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 667
|
I'd go with a GMT, but only if it was a 5-digit reference. Swappable bezel and non-PCL make it more versatile.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.