Submariner or GMT if you had to choose one

[bigpopaz]

Sub!

[Premiumwatches24]

I've used to have both but then one had to go, so I asked myself the same question and realized that I'm really into submariners, so I go for the subs

[Gharddog03]

GMT!!! The bezel on the GMT awesome.

[slide13]

If we're talking older models then it's a toss up because the Pepsi GMT is awesome.

But if newer, then Sub for me. I don't have use for a GMT function really and prefer the countdown bezel of the Sub. But more importantly I want the Glidelock bracelet without PCLs.

[beshannon]

I own both

[ajas]

Sub

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[Phil G.]

I have a GMTIIC and if given the choice now, would get a Sub. Just a more classic all around sports watch. The GMT is dressier, but I don't love the PCLs, and wouldn't get a Rolex with them again.

[cstar]

Sub no doubt

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk

[Nav01L]

GMT for me, just that little tad less obvious than the Sub. I like that. Tough a glide lock would admittedly have been a great addition.

[tjbender]

5 digit GMT. More comfortable, brushed CLs, more comfy, can also use bezel as a timer, additional complication is awesome to have, Pepsi bezel is a great pop of colour.

[WEST HAM ROLEX]

GMT - Black
But also love the BLNR

[adawil2002]

GMT, does 2 time zones with ease, more bang for the buck than the comparable Sub.

[AK797]

Sub, prefer the less busy bezel as well.

[jinikari01]

I prefer GMT.

[Old Geezer]

I have both. If I could only have one, I would give the nod to the GMT because I travel quite a bit and use the complication often. Must admit, I can get a better fit sub for my wrist with the glidelock versus the easylink.

[brandrea]

I've owned both multiple times and the Sub keeps sticking

[sea-dweller]

Sub, for me.

[Gerry62]

Submariner

[Sammk]

What I needed to do was start a poll...but unfortunately missed it... whose winning sub or gmt...seems like a tough call

[dba]

GMT. I bought my first Rolex in 1984 because this guy had one. While I love the size and blue lume of the 216570, there's nothing like a 16710 Pepsi.

Thanks to Jake's Rolex World for the photo

[manilenyo]

GMT, since I use its complication more than the sub.

[cc75]

GMT, I'am in love with my Pepsi.

[JBrown717]

GMT. Can't really explain why, it's just a visual thing after putting them on one after the other. Yes, the GMT is busier and yes, it does have polished center links. I guess those must be the qualities that makes me like it more.

[strafer_kid]

Originally Posted by slide13

If we're talking older models then it's a toss up because the Pepsi GMT is awesome.

But if newer, then Sub for me. I don't have use for a GMT function really and prefer the countdown bezel of the Sub. But more importantly I want the Glidelock bracelet without PCLs.

Same here - if modern then SubC but if older then probably GMT 16710

[lord91]

the Sub. You can use its bezel for a second time zone when you need it, or other purposes, while having a cleaner looking watch. It can do anything you would need in real life and still have that classic look. At first i thought i would miss not having PCLs, but after owning a Sub i realised i like it a lot more with them brushed.

[rkot07]

GMT.
I did some research online of the most useful complications in a watch number one was the date and number two was a GMT feature.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Rolex.c6]

Can't go wrong with neither of both icon watches. For me if I had to choose, the Sub because of already mentioned reasons: glidelock clasp and bcl. Although I travel more than I dive....

[edolecki]

GMT by a whisker.

[the_natural]

Submariner all the way.

[Hollister]

Sub for me, the GMT complication is redundant as I am capable of simple arithmetic. Here's one of mine: