ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

DLCU2 · 10 June 2014, 01:03 PM

If money wasn't an issue? Absolutely!

And just because money isn't an issue, I can get all the other models too right?

Laszlo · 10 June 2014, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FTX I

Hell yes! I have both and would buy both over and over again.

Nice shots, Flavio.

sbp9092 · 10 June 2014, 02:42 PM

No

sea-dweller · 10 June 2014, 02:46 PM

I would.

astro98 · 10 June 2014, 03:13 PM

I have the no date and it's awesome

roklee · 10 June 2014, 04:10 PM

Yes.

DCheeta · 10 June 2014, 04:16 PM

Not both ceramic models. If they were different eras, then yes. I have a Sub Date 1680 and a Sub 14060. To me, they're very different watches.

FTX I · 10 June 2014, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laszlo

Nice shots, Flavio.

Thank you my friend

Jake B · 11 June 2014, 01:26 AM

Not exactly, but I do have the equivalent in the former versions right before the ceramics were introduced, the 16610 Submariner Date & the 14060 Submariner.

Add to that a Sub-C 114060 and I guess we can say that given the right circumstances I might add a Sub-C 116610LN

I just love Submariner. If I could I'd own one of every Sub made through the model's evolution.

FTX I · 11 June 2014, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake B

I just love Submariner. If I could I'd own one of every Sub made through the model's evolution.

+1. It's my favorite watch by far. Wish I had larger wrists to be able to own 4 and 5 digit ones and have perfect fit from the old bracelet.

kam1 · 11 June 2014, 04:19 AM

No, but I would and did buy a 14060m Sub.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Alfredo. · 11 June 2014, 04:26 AM

Yes! The Sub C ND is the most iconic sub IMO!

AK797 · 11 June 2014, 04:47 AM

I wouldn't buy two black subs, but adding a gold/TT sub would be no problem for me.

DCheeta · 11 June 2014, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake B

I just love Submariner. If I could I'd own one of every Sub made through the model's evolution.

I'm afraid I might end up with this collection someday. Then I'll add the SeaDwellers.

zen watch · 3 July 2014, 03:42 PM

No

AnthonyJR · 3 July 2014, 03:48 PM

Would you have a 3some? I would....

Rogdogg · 3 July 2014, 04:26 PM

As Neil has said above, I wouldn't do it with 2 black subs but if I could afford it I could easily see myself buying the ND Sub (black obviously) and the LVc. I reckon then I would have subs covered, date, no date, Black, Colour....
The only missing piece would be the WG Sub........That is the dream for me right now

mechanicaltime · 3 July 2014, 05:26 PM

One SubC is enough for me.

rg9390 · 3 July 2014, 05:40 PM

No

soho · 3 July 2014, 07:15 PM

Not in the same color, but potentially in different ones.

leicashot · 3 July 2014, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FTX I

Hell yes! I have both and would buy both over and over again.

The question is 'which do you wear more?'

MrJ320 · 3 July 2014, 09:09 PM

No I'd probably keep the sub-c no date and add a GMT II instead of the sub-c date for a bit more variety.

submariner66 · 3 July 2014, 09:17 PM

I have two subs one ceramic one pre ceramic, One of my next watches is a sub date. Different looking enough for me with the cyclops to want one. But I really like subs.

FTX I · 3 July 2014, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leicashot

The question is 'which do you wear more?'

The ND is the one I wear everyday.

leicashot · 3 July 2014, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FTX I

The ND is the one I wear everyday.

Thanks for the reply

FTX I · 3 July 2014, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leicashot

Thanks for the reply

Shan77 · 4 July 2014, 12:58 AM

No

Roll the Lex · 4 July 2014, 12:59 AM

No.
Well I guess never say never. I can't own two black subs. Now if the sub date was a hulk or TT or yg, then I might consider it. But I'd look at other no date rolexes first.

Sent from my iPhone 9S using Tapatalk

Mack Bolan · 4 July 2014, 01:04 AM

I have a Sub C TT Blusey (which has the date) and a Sub C No-date..so yes I guess I did. but they look different enough to feel like 2 totally different watches even though they are both Subs.

HogwldFLTR · 4 July 2014, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake B

Not exactly, but I do have the equivalent in the former versions right before the ceramics were introduced, the 16610 Submariner Date & the 14060 Submariner.

Add to that a Sub-C 114060 and I guess we can say that given the right circumstances I might add a Sub-C 116610LN

I just love Submariner. If I could I'd own one of every Sub made through the model's evolution.

Nice thought process; I can totally understand that.

As far as owning both an 14060 and 114060. The 14060 allows for easy transformation to varied straps and inserts where as the 114060 is like a monument built to be unchanged and permanent in an ever changing world. They are visually similar but very different watches. I apologize for the crappy pictures.

11 June 2014, 01:26 AM	#39
Jake B "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Hong Kong Watch: Gold Sub 116618LN Posts: 2,820	Not exactly, but I do have the equivalent in the former versions right before the ceramics were introduced, the 16610 Submariner Date & the 14060 Submariner. Add to that a Sub-C 114060 and I guess we can say that given the right circumstances I might add a Sub-C 116610LN I just love Submariner. If I could I'd own one of every Sub made through the model's evolution. __________________ Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

3 July 2014, 05:40 PM	#49
rg9390 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Sydney, HK Watch: Daytona SS Posts: 447	No __________________ Patek Philippe \| Audemars Piguet \| Vacheron Constantin \| Rolex \| Tudor \| Grand Seiko \| Baume & Mercier \| Bamford London \| Swatch x Omega \| Swatch x Blancpain \| Casio

10 June 2014, 01:03 PM	#31
DLCU2 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Lee Location: USA Watch: Me Go Broke Posts: 115	If money wasn't an issue? Absolutely! And just because money isn't an issue, I can get all the other models too right?

10 June 2014, 02:42 PM	#33
sbp9092 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: San Diego Posts: 12	No

10 June 2014, 02:46 PM	#34
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I would.

10 June 2014, 03:13 PM	#35
astro98 Banned Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: USA Watch: Sub No Date Posts: 278	I have the no date and it's awesome

10 June 2014, 04:10 PM	#36
roklee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: canada Watch: rolex explorer ii Posts: 493	Yes.

10 June 2014, 04:16 PM	#37
DCheeta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Dave Location: NYC Posts: 7,180	Not both ceramic models. If they were different eras, then yes. I have a Sub Date 1680 and a Sub 14060. To me, they're very different watches.

11 June 2014, 04:19 AM	#41
kam1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: the Burgh Watch: coupla subs & GMT Posts: 134	No, but I would and did buy a 14060m Sub. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

11 June 2014, 04:26 AM	#42
Alfredo. "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Margaritaville Posts: 3,639	Yes! The Sub C ND is the most iconic sub IMO!

11 June 2014, 04:47 AM	#43
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,220	I wouldn't buy two black subs, but adding a gold/TT sub would be no problem for me.

3 July 2014, 03:42 PM	#45
zen watch "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: SEA Watch: Subc Posts: 147	No

3 July 2014, 03:48 PM	#46
AnthonyJR "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Real Name: Anthony Location: Irvine, CA Watch: YMII Posts: 38	Would you have a 3some? I would....

3 July 2014, 04:26 PM	#47
Rogdogg "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Bangkok Posts: 6,117	As Neil has said above, I wouldn't do it with 2 black subs but if I could afford it I could easily see myself buying the ND Sub (black obviously) and the LVc. I reckon then I would have subs covered, date, no date, Black, Colour.... The only missing piece would be the WG Sub........That is the dream for me right now

3 July 2014, 05:26 PM	#48
mechanicaltime "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: GMT -6 Watch: 114060 Posts: 212	One SubC is enough for me.

3 July 2014, 07:15 PM	#50
soho 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Planet Earth Watch: Varies Posts: 2,030	Not in the same color, but potentially in different ones.

3 July 2014, 09:09 PM	#52
MrJ320 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Real Name: James Location: Toronto Watch: IG: @j.project Posts: 2,194	No I'd probably keep the sub-c no date and add a GMT II instead of the sub-c date for a bit more variety.

3 July 2014, 09:17 PM	#53
submariner66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: John Location: New York Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,138	I have two subs one ceramic one pre ceramic, One of my next watches is a sub date. Different looking enough for me with the cyclops to want one. But I really like subs.

4 July 2014, 12:58 AM	#57
Shan77 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: UK Posts: 181	No

4 July 2014, 12:59 AM	#58
Roll the Lex "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Midwest Posts: 1,842	No. Well I guess never say never. I can't own two black subs. Now if the sub date was a hulk or TT or yg, then I might consider it. But I'd look at other no date rolexes first. Sent from my iPhone 9S using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)