The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 August 2014, 06:57 AM   #1
Fellini
"TRF" Member
 
Fellini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Ian
Location: SW10 + Berlin
Watch: 1953 Explorer
Posts: 119
Speedy Redux? Just don't.

The only watch ever that quit working while on my wrist for no apparent reason is that unhealthy combination of a cheap Eta ticker with a non-fitting chrono module. I've talked to several very knowledgeable guys within the trade (who downright refused to try servicing it), and it basically comes down to the unfortunate facts I'm quoting here from another website, as this is the last effort I make regarding an Omega (Obviously Mechanical Garbage) Automatic Redux: Stay away, pals. You don't want this piece of ****.

"I've heard privately from several different people who have talked to watchmakers that the chronograph module in the reduced is a exceedingly difficult one to service... The time module, which is essentially a SeMP (non-chronograph) movement is is not at issue, however the word on the internet is that the chronograph module is nearly impossible to service or adjust for even the most technically adept watchmakers who speed though other common Omega Movements (c.321, c.x86x, c.1040, c.1041, c.1045, 7750's, etc.)... At least one watchmaker is known to just mail the chronograph module to Bienne and ask for a new module complete, which Omega will send, no questions asked, for a cost of around $140 US. Apparenly it is significantly less hassle to pay that cost than to work to repair the module."
Fellini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2014, 05:06 PM   #2
Nsx_23
"TRF" Member
 
Nsx_23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 607
Interesting post. I was looking at one the other day....
Nsx_23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2014, 09:25 PM   #3
Fellini
"TRF" Member
 
Fellini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Ian
Location: SW10 + Berlin
Watch: 1953 Explorer
Posts: 119
My pleasure if I helped you avoid something unpleasant. Plus do have a look at their official pricelist: a simple revision for this masterpiece of non-engineering will set you back a whopping 560 Euro. I presume they just throw the whole thing away and put in a new movement, which comes at half that price, approximately. I'm gonna use mine as a paperweight henceforth, but only for very small papers in environments with reduced gravity. The last Omega in space... ;)
Fellini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2014, 11:15 PM   #4
joe100
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,753
I had a Speedmaster automatic 39mm for a long time. It also had the dubois-depraz piggyback module and was completely trouble free. Service costs were exactly the same as my 7750s. I wouldn't call them junk by any means, maybe complicated and a little harder to service but not junk
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2014, 11:20 PM   #5
Omega21
"TRF" Member
 
Omega21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maryland, USA
Watch: Omega Flightmaster
Posts: 118
Fellini, do you mind posting a pic of your watch? Sorry you had this issue!
__________________
Omega21
♛ GMT Master II 16710 Coke
Tudor Pelagos LHD
Tudor Pelagos "2 line"
Ω Flightmaster 911
Ω Seamaster Cosmic
Omega21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2014, 02:39 AM   #6
SlimJim16v
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: London
Posts: 15
Yes, I have heard about the difficult, but not impossible to service chrono module. Mine however is still working as it should.

It's reduced, not redux, which means something completely different.
SlimJim16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2014, 01:37 AM   #7
Fellini
"TRF" Member
 
Fellini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Ian
Location: SW10 + Berlin
Watch: 1953 Explorer
Posts: 119
oops, got that mixed up, sorry. Plus I guess I should not waste your and my time anymore. Let's just agree to love those 321s...
Attached Images
File Type: png Bildschirmfoto 2014-08-20 um 17.36.08.png (36.7 KB, 230 views)
Fellini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2014, 01:34 PM   #8
utc66
"TRF" Member
 
utc66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DC
Watch: 16600, PAM112,EZM1
Posts: 463
Is this dubois-depraz piggyback the same movement that the tudor heritage chrono (tHC) has with the 45 minute timer?
utc66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2014, 02:34 PM   #9
s.justinlee
"TRF" Member
 
s.justinlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Justin
Location: california
Posts: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by utc66 View Post
Is this dubois-depraz piggyback the same movement that the tudor heritage chrono (tHC) has with the 45 minute timer?
I believe you are right.
Does the original vintage version have the same movt?
s.justinlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 November 2020, 11:17 PM   #10
Fellini
"TRF" Member
 
Fellini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Ian
Location: SW10 + Berlin
Watch: 1953 Explorer
Posts: 119
nope, those have Val 234's and work fiiiiiine :)
Fellini is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.