Video comparison of the differences between new ref. 126500ln Daytona vs. 116500ln

[AD337]

https://youtu.be/WkZ3BhywVCo?si=dDBLPWRmA0vHlUNp


I personally own this new reference Daytona and much prefer it to my old 116500ln. All of the subtle changes are great but the main thing for me is the more substantial case size. I have a large wrist at 7.5inch so this is such a win for me as my favorite steel watch can FINALLY look like it properly fits on me. I always felt my old ref. looked alittle too small on wrist no matter how much I hated to admit it. Anyway I just thought some of you guys could benefit from this video.

[DaytonaAlan]

I've had both. I much prefer the 126500. I would have no problem if I only had the 116500, but if given the choice, new one for sure. The white dial is incredible. But the key is to see it in real life. In pictures or on video, sometimes it looks ... weird. The ring, the case profile, etc. But the second I actually put it on, wow. Tiny little changes lead to a huge upgrade.

[Watchman001]

Just got my white 126500 today after owning several past steel models, and to me, this is the best by far. I was concerned about the new case losing some sleekness, but the watch wears amazing. I am really glad I went with white, it is amazing. This watch has hype for a reason. It is awesome.

[Vigilante24]

I’ll be in the minority so far and disagree that the 125600 is an upgrade. I still prefer the aesthetics and wear of the older reference. For the white dial, the thinner sub dials and addition of the metal ring makes the watch less appealing. Less sporty and the features that made it stand out have been subdued.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by Watchman001

Just got my white 126500 today after owning several past steel models, and to me, this is the best by far. I was concerned about the new case losing some sleekness, but the watch wears amazing. I am really glad I went with white, it is amazing. This watch has hype for a reason. It is awesome.

Congratulations

[Watchman001]

Originally Posted by brandrea

Congratulations

Thank you!

[1st amg]

Excellent choice…the video was great too


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[illiguy]

Shocked the case thickness on the newer was slightly bigger on the 12. It had been reported through multiple outlets that the 12 would actually be thinner.

[cornsyrup_bezel]

as an owner of both references agree with comments that 126 series is a great upgrade. It needs to be seen in person and on the wrist to truly appreciate the wearability and design changes.

[Mystro]

I always loved his videos. His camera work is excellent. He is really infusing his own opinion towards the 12 series even though the measurements he states would support the opposite like dial being smaller on the new reference. Regardless, I find the previous 11 series Daytona more bold and sporty looking to my eye.

[Mystro]

Originally Posted by illiguy

Shocked the case thickness on the newer was slightly bigger on the 12. It had been reported through multiple outlets that the 12 would actually be thinner.

I think the dial being smaller on the new reference is even more of a shocker. Between being marginally thicker, a smaller dial, taller lugs and thicker crown guards is what gives the 12 series a chunkier profile.

[jcdevoe26]

Originally Posted by Mystro

I think the dial being smaller on the new reference is even more of a shocker. Between being marginally thicker, a smaller dial, taller lugs and thicker crown guards is what gives the 12 series a chunkier profile.

I thought I was going crazy when I tried on the new 12 series model. I told the SA that it looked and felt thicker and sat taller on the wrist...he assured me that it was much thinner than the outgoing model. I also felt like the dial was smaller or the bezel was bigger (I tried on a TT). Of course as a small wristed person I was also said to verify that the the lug to lug had grown at least 1mm....I know everyone has different opinions, and my opinion is that the 12 series is a major misstep by the crown.

[BraveBold]

Originally Posted by jcdevoe26

I thought I was going crazy when I tried on the new 12 series model. I told the SA that it looked and felt thicker and sat taller on the wrist...he assured me that it was much thinner than the outgoing model. I also felt like the dial was smaller or the bezel was bigger (I tried on a TT). Of course as a small wristed person I was also said to verify that the the lug to lug had grown at least 1mm....I know everyone has different opinions, and my opinion is that the 12 series is a major misstep by the crown.

Agree. It already looks aged (poorly) compared to the 116. Especially in-person where the benefit of the outer ring for photography (contrast to backgrounds) is no longer relevant.

Still a nice watch but a move in the wrong direction.

[nr1416]

For me I like the thicker subdial rings and chunk of ceramic on the 116500s. with the outter steel ring around the bezel it makes the watch look like many other chronos.

[APPRF]

This definitely reinforces the original view for a lot of people that the old 116500 is the better looking version. I'm still waiting for a direct same color comparison video of both new and old white dial Pandas

[jcdevoe26]

Originally Posted by nr1416

For me I like the thicker subdial rings and chunk of ceramic on the 116500s. with the outter steel ring around the bezel it makes the watch look like many other chronos.

The outer metal ring was also a bad move in my opinion....too similar to the Speedmaster. I love both watches, but I love both because of the differences (dials/handsets/bezels etc)...adding the bezel ring just doesnt feel right.

[ctzn]

Originally Posted by illiguy

Shocked the case thickness on the newer was slightly bigger on the 12. It had been reported through multiple outlets that the 12 would actually be thinner.

Every measurement I've seen of the 12 puts it at 12mm or 11.9mm. I just measured mine at exactly 12mm thick. I'm not sure how he's getting 12.26mm.

[Watchman001]

Don’t judge the 126500 by photos and videos alone. You have to see in the metal to appreciate. I had doubts til I saw in person.

[928ktgold]

Originally Posted by Watchman001

Don’t judge the 126500 by photos and videos alone. You have to see in the metal to appreciate. I had doubts til I saw in person.

Agree. I loved my 116500 white but just traded it in yesterday. I was not on the new white dial train at all. I love the old smaller elegant case. The new reference is nice enough to get me to trade in my old Daytona. My dad still has a 116500ln black so I guess that made it easier for me to trade my old grail SS watch.

An another note, the screw down pushers see to have less grip than the old screws

[Bazil]

Hafiz has great content in his videos, 116500 if my preference .. black dial ..

[Greg.A]

Does seems like white 116500ln and 126500ln black are the winners for respective models from the video and comments

[ol' Rex]

Originally Posted by DaytonaAlan

[...]But the key is to see it in real life. In pictures or on video, sometimes it looks ... weird. The ring, the case profile, etc. But the second I actually put it on, wow. Tiny little changes lead to a huge upgrade.

I agree. When the new model came out, I had my doubts, but that was based on photos from the internet.

Now that I have seen and tried on the 126500ln in white and black I think the changes really are improvements, but it is impossible for me to say which I find more appealing. Both are equally stunning in their own way.

[Brian Page]

Originally Posted by AD337

https://youtu.be/WkZ3BhywVCo?si=dDBLPWRmA0vHlUNp


I personally own this new reference Daytona and much prefer it to my old 116500ln. All of the subtle changes are great but the main thing for me is the more substantial case size. I have a large wrist at 7.5inch so this is such a win for me as my favorite steel watch can FINALLY look like it properly fits on me. I always felt my old ref. looked alittle too small on wrist no matter how much I hated to admit it. Anyway I just thought some of you guys could benefit from this video.

Good video

[Big Tex Rolex]

I got rid of my 11 Series Submariner, because I did not like the “squared off / bulky looking” Maxi Case …

I traded it for the “round looking / sleek” 12 Series Submariner, and prefer the look of it.

Has Rolex done the inverse with the Daytona ?

I own the 116500 (Black), and want the White, either the 116500 or 126500 …

have they changed the sleek looking 116500 into a bulkier / Maxi Case with the 126500 ??

[Straphanger]

I have both and the verdict is not clear , the 116 looks more like a tool and the 126 is more sophisticated but may be a bit too much !

[Deppe]

Originally Posted by Big Tex Rolex

I got rid of my 11 Series Submariner, because I did not like the “squared off / bulky looking” Maxi Case …

I traded it for the “round looking / sleek” 12 Series Submariner, and prefer the look of it.

Has Rolex done the inverse with the Daytona ?

I own the 116500 (Black), and want the White, either the 116500 or 126500 …

have they changed the sleek looking 116500 into a bulkier / Maxi Case with the 126500 ??

I have searched for an answer on this as well - some say that they are very satisfied with the new because it is now bigger and bulkier, others say that here are no difference compared between the 116500 and 126500. I think when looking at pictures, the 126500 clearly has a bulkier profile than 116500, but not necessarily at the same level as the maxi case 116610 had. Or that’s what I gather from what I read.

[928ktgold]

Originally Posted by Vigilante24

I’ll be in the minority so far and disagree that the 125600 is an upgrade. I still prefer the aesthetics and wear of the older reference. For the white dial, the thinner sub dials and addition of the metal ring makes the watch less appealing. Less sporty and the features that made it stand out have been subdued.

Wear one for a day and you’ll see. I’ve had it for 4 days now. I didn’t think I’d want the new one but I’m on convinced now. Traded my white 116 for the new 126 white. Call me convinced. I love the old case because of its small case. I almost didn’t trade it due to that reason alone but now appreciate the new reference

[928ktgold]

Originally Posted by Deppe

I have searched for an answer on this as well - some say that they are very satisfied with the new because it is now bigger and bulkier, others say that here are no difference compared between the 116500 and 126500. I think when looking at pictures, the 126500 clearly has a bulkier profile than 116500, but not necessarily at the same level as the maxi case 116610 had. Or that’s what I gather from what I read.

Yes the new 126 Daytona is bigger but not like the new 124060 sub or 126710 BLNR gmt. The new Daytona definitely feels smaller than those 2.
It does feel slightly bigger than my old 116 but almost not noticeable.

[karleone]

Originally Posted by Big Tex Rolex

I got rid of my 11 Series Submariner, because I did not like the “squared off / bulky looking” Maxi Case …

I traded it for the “round looking / sleek” 12 Series Submariner, and prefer the look of it.

Has Rolex done the inverse with the Daytona ?

I own the 116500 (Black), and want the White, either the 116500 or 126500 …

have they changed the sleek looking 116500 into a bulkier / Maxi Case with the 126500 ??

Yes definitely a bulkier / maxi case on the new ref

[salnuaimi]

Originally Posted by Greg.A

Does seems like white 116500ln and 126500ln black are the winners for respective models from the video and comments

This