ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 September 2018, 11:07 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 50
|
Would you buy a 15305 today?
Hi All,
I’ve been into the 15305ST for years but never pulled the trigger. When I was finally ready, the 15407 double balance had just been unveiled and my AD told me it was worth the wait. I’m still waiting and doubt I’ll get one any time soon - but that isn’t the real point. I’m starting to think I’m a 39mm guy. The only APs I’ve ever loved enough to buy after trying were 15202s. I hate the 14400 on my 6,8 inch wrist. I know it fits - but I don’t like the fit. Perhaps the 15407 will sit differently, unlikely, or just be worth it because of the golden bridge and double balance, but I’m starting to think I should just grab a 15305st. Which has led me to look at their prices - which seem pretty bananas (asking prices ranging from 55-67k). Wanted to get your thoughts on whether this is a dumb time to buy such a piece or it’s likely pretty safe now... I don’t mind waiting, have enough hype pieces. I assume this will be a keeper but who knows, hence why I’d like to avoid losing 30 percent in 1-2 years if I get bored. The other 39mm opernworked AP option on the short list along with waiting for a 15407 (at retail of around 45k) is the 39mm openworked QP. The openworked QP option is the same or very close price wise, and a whole lot more for the cash but I think I prefer the look of the 15305 and it won’t be a daily wear so a perpetual seems dumb. Am I crazy on this front ? Anyways, thanks for any thoughts. The only AP I currently own is a 15202OR. |
23 September 2018, 11:32 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,873
|
I have both. To tell you honestly, 15305 fits better on my 6.75" wrist proportion wise. But 15407 is visually more attractive. The 15407 wears exactly the same as the 15400. Case is basically the same 41mm with some minor thickness different.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 |
24 September 2018, 12:05 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 50
|
Thanks. You pretty much mirror my feelings 100%. The new version is more visually interesting, a bit unsure whether I find the golden bridge a bit glitzy lately. If you had to choose one, which would it be ? And do you think paying current prices on the 305 is nuts ?
|
24 September 2018, 12:10 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,873
|
Quote:
Prices are dictated by market supply and demand. Right now, 407s are super hard to get, with huge waitlist. For anyone without a good relationship with AP, it's near impossible to get one. This has indirectly driven up the secondary market prices of 305s as well which have been trading at premium for a while now. As to worth it or not, it depends on you. If you truly love the watch and plan to keep it long term, it should not really matter.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 |
|
24 September 2018, 12:20 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
|
|
24 September 2018, 12:45 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,340
|
I had a 15400 and found it too big, so think the 407 would suffer the same with me, our wrist sizes are similar. If I were to ever want an open worked, it would be the 305 for sure. But I do find the 407 more attractive, so for me, I do not want either as a result. Now if they made a 39mm variant again which looks like the 407, could be problematic for me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
24 September 2018, 02:46 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: USA
Posts: 542
|
OP...if you hate the 15400 on the wrist, I’m afraid the 15407 would be the same. However, you may be staring at the skelotonized dial too much to actually notice.
|
24 September 2018, 03:03 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
Any body know how many 305ST were made ? |
|
24 September 2018, 03:26 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 257
|
Would you buy a 15305 today?
15305 with the golden bridge would be perfect.
I wouldn’t buy it at this price though. Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
__________________
AP 15300ST - Rolex Daytona 116500LN - Tudor BB58 - IWC Portugieser chrono IW3714 - Breitling Colt 44 |
24 September 2018, 04:13 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: USA
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
|
|
24 September 2018, 05:42 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,116
|
I’d go do the 39mm QP
__________________
I have a weakness for Travel Watches, Platinum, Vintage Rolex and 1960s Divers |
24 September 2018, 12:50 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: CA
Watch: VC Toledo 1952
Posts: 1,063
|
Yes
Sent from my Zeitwerk |
24 September 2018, 02:05 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,856
|
I think buying a 15305 at dealers asking prices is a recipe for disaster. The fact that you’re questioning it now leads me to believe you’ll question it after buying it which will impede your ability to fully enjoy it.
__________________
|
24 September 2018, 02:14 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 50
|
I wouldn’t pay the asking price, but it will surely cost me more than the 44k the 15407 retails for and I guess, my point is that at this price point there are tons of other high end pieces ... so just wanted to know if you guys thought it simply daft to spend in this range for an old time only skeleton? Many dealers and watch guys I know think this is a very safe price, likely to hold or increase - and I just wanted to pressure test that (since I’m not so sure).
What it’s “worth” to each of us is subjective and none of us know what it will trade for in the future ... I recognize that - so what I’m really asking for is informed opinions I guess. People seem more than willing to fork over 60k for a 15407, is it nuts for me to fork over similar cash for the 39mm older version ? I do take your point re if I’m thinking about “is it worth it already” ... It’ll like affect my enjoyment. That probably happened on my first and only RM purchase. Last edited by niqui7ladoo; 24 September 2018 at 02:16 PM.. Reason: Nits |
25 September 2018, 03:27 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: no fixed location
Posts: 72
|
I was quite late to the AP party. Only started collecting some few years ago. While i cherish my 15407st quite considerably, I would have loved to own a 15305... just not at these current prices.
|
4 October 2018, 01:03 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: argentina
Posts: 11
|
I personnally love the 15407, my wrist feels its weight and size is OK
|
6 November 2018, 01:57 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: NONYA
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: Many
Posts: 252
|
Not sure how close you are to you AD but chances are by the time its your "turn" in line they will no longer be an AD. AP is going boutique only and i don't know many non perpetual/tourb owners who got a double balance (asides from myself :)).
I own both 15305 and 15407 (OR versions). I prefer the dial of the 15407 but fits way too bulky for me. I prefer any 39 AP to a 41 any day. |
6 November 2018, 04:32 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CN&CA
Posts: 146
|
Personally I have tried both ST and OR on wrist, and I probably have a similar wrist size as OP (15202 fits good, 15400 too bulky).
For wrist presence , OR actually looks better than ST IMHO. The steel is a bit boring comparing to details of openwork, rose gold will balance it better. I dont know why OR makes the watch look smaller than ST too. My suggestion is maybe try on both with gray if possible, wrist presence is key. You might feel the same as I do which is a 41mm 15407or actually works. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.