|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 December 2015, 12:18 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 425
|
Seller insists this is authentic
Hi, I posted this yesterday and some people said it was not original. The seller insists it is. Reposting for confirmation. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
8 December 2015, 12:19 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 425
|
Back of the insert
|
|
|
|
|
8 December 2015, 01:05 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,813
|
First picture is not sharp...
What is it supposed to fit? An early model (5512,5513, 1680) or later model? Pearl looks a bit large for a plexi model and I cant clearly see if there is a metal surround fir the pearl in the fuzzy first picture. I'll go with non-genuine based on these pictures. |
|
|
|
|
8 December 2015, 01:15 PM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 425
|
Yes, there's a metal fitting around the pearl. This is suppose to be for a 5512, 1680, 5513, 1665.
|
|
|
|
|
8 December 2015, 10:15 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 86
|
don't think there should be a metal fitting around pearl for 5513
|
|
|
|
|
9 December 2015, 12:08 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,813
|
Nope. Stay away from that one.
|
|
|
|
|
9 December 2015, 12:54 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Nathaniel
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,991
|
Definitely no good for a 4 digit submariner.
__________________
sumnersdr on Instagram |
|
|
|
|
9 December 2015, 01:21 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 425
|
Thanks for your help.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
