ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 June 2017, 01:55 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 1,057
|
Opinion . .Is a 5513 gloss preferable over a 14060 ?
I do like a plexi but if I can't find a matte dial (within budget!) is it worth getting a nice 5513 with WG & gloss dial or would I be better off just getting 14060 ?
I have a nice shiny 114060 which I love but fancy something with a bit of vintage / SS / patina . . I have owned 14060m COSC & a 16610 previously What do you think ? |
29 June 2017, 02:35 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,789
|
Based on your description, I'd say, yes, a late 5513 would be what you'd want.
It's similar to a 14060, but also quite different. The plexi gives the 5513, even with the wg surrounds on the hour markers, a different feel. Either model could have varying degrees of patina, as long as the 14060 has a tritium dial/hands, of course. Still, be ready to pay a lot more for the 5513. |
29 June 2017, 07:15 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Grant
Location: NZ
Watch: Moon
Posts: 1,699
|
|
29 June 2017, 09:34 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 885
|
Since you've owned new and sapphire and say you want a taste of vintage, I agree to look for a 5513. Even if the matte dial is out of your budget, the plexi crystal will give the watch a different feel and look than a 14060 tritium. Good luck.
|
29 June 2017, 12:13 PM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,355
|
I sold my 14060 long ago, and kept my L-serial 5513. I had it overhauled by the RSC with Luminova dial and hands, and new acrylic crystal, so something of a vintage vibe and modern functionality.
|
29 June 2017, 12:38 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 885
|
I think that is just about exactly what the OP is after. Looks great by the way.
|
29 June 2017, 01:15 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PRJ
Posts: 1,731
|
I can't post a photo because most would deem it an obscenity: I wear a late 5513 with a 5512 matte service dial. I have the original WG-surrounds dial saved in case I ever sell. My point is that there are less-pricey alternatives in the form of service dials if you want the matte look without paying the premium. Depends how much of a purist you happen to be.
__________________
"Do you like Breitling?" "I don't know, really, I've never been Breitled" |
29 June 2017, 01:30 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,194
|
gloss 5513 over the 14060...every time for me.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
29 June 2017, 06:33 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 1,057
|
|
29 June 2017, 06:35 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northants, UK
Posts: 1,057
|
|
30 June 2017, 12:12 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Asia / USA
Watch: on my wrist!
Posts: 113
|
i'd recommend a matte 16800...
|
30 June 2017, 04:23 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Central Cal
Watch: Dads Omega Cal 601
Posts: 707
|
Just for the look, I prefer plexi with a matte dial.
|
1 July 2017, 12:50 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Sam
Location: VRB/SUS
Watch: 16233, First Rolex
Posts: 1,646
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.