ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 August 2022, 01:06 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 67
|
Tactile texture of platinum
I recently completed a required mission for me as a watch collector and acquired an all platinum Rolex! 118206 daydate 36 wave dial. Love it! Suits me very well.
I've noticed when I run my finger along the platinum it feels slightly tacky as compared to steel - maybe a little rougher than steel - as if it's grabbing the skin and holding on a little - as compared to steel which just feels smoother performing the same motion. Do any of you platinum owners notice this? It's almost unnerving as I feel like just running the finger along the polished surfaces is scratching it! Which may be the case indeed as it does scratch quite easily ... (PS yes it's clean) |
8 August 2022, 01:16 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
I've never noticed this just with my hands on my 228206. To be honest I don't do this very often as it will micro scratch the surface.
In saying that they say platinum is "gummy" as a metal but personally never noticed via just touching it. |
8 August 2022, 01:21 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: NC
Posts: 144
|
I definitely can relate to what you're saying, with my platinum Daytona feeling like it has slightly more friction against the skin compared to my stainless yachtmaster 40. I think it's largely a function of platinum's much higher density, and in turn mass, compared to the stainless, but to be honest the extra grip is useful for such heavy watches to prevent them from sliding so much. Perhaps polished platinum has a higher coefficient of static friction compared to stainless, but I haven't looked it up.
|
8 August 2022, 01:46 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,365
|
Quote:
Now for my totally non value add comment: platinum is so heavy versus steel it creates its own little gravity field. That must be the ‘tacky’ sensation you are feeling caused by the pull. |
|
8 August 2022, 01:51 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,347
|
Yes - notice it with my Daydate 40 platinum.
|
8 August 2022, 02:53 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 67
|
cool! One of those rare moments where It's not 'just me'
|
8 August 2022, 03:34 PM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Dustin
Location: A, TX
Posts: 1,571
|
|
8 August 2022, 04:25 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
|
8 August 2022, 05:59 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,053
|
I've noticed this too. It also seems to wear a bit warmer.
|
8 August 2022, 06:12 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
|
8 August 2022, 06:29 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Real Name: rd
Location: uk
Posts: 1,444
|
Quote:
|
|
8 August 2022, 06:41 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,160
|
Quote:
Wait… platinum scratches easily? That sucks, I thought it was like the hardest metals out there. So then what’s the advantage over gold? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
8 August 2022, 06:53 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
Quote:
Yes it does. It’s a gummy metal but it does show scratches. The thing with platinum is because it’s gummy the scratches are metal just moving around as opposed to loosing the metal. It is no where near the hardest metal out there. It’s incredibly dense though. Stupid heavy. What’s great about platinum is it it is a pm but understated. 95% pure by weight. My wedding bands are plat along with dd. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
8 August 2022, 06:55 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
Quote:
Just ran my finger along the 9 o’clock side of the case. Yeah okay I see what you mean. Again I really don’t do this often. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
8 August 2022, 09:33 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,053
|
You can easily burnish out scratches and dings on platinum using a tungsten carbide rod. There's no metal lost unlike gold or silver.
Why tungsten? Platinum is easily contaminated and tungsten is the only metal that won't leave marks. |
8 August 2022, 09:46 PM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,696
|
Interesting comments here … I’d don’t think I’ve ever heard this come up before
|
8 August 2022, 10:21 PM | #17 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
|
While I don’t suggest rubbing your Platinum watch with a tungsten carbide rod, this jeweler gives a decent explainer.
Platinum is more dense than gold in more ways than one. In the 100% pure state, the same volume of platinum in a 1cm cube weighs 60% more than gold. On a molecular level there are more molecules packed into that little cube of platinum. Mohs of 4 in pure Pt is very close to 14k Au at 3.5-4 (depending upon the alloy). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
8 August 2022, 11:10 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Maryland
Watch: 118209
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
But yes, platinum is very scratchy; my wedding ring testifies to that. I happen to like the look of weathered metal, and don't stress over every hairline and swirl I add to my white gold 118209, but I also don't think much about resale value; I wear my watches. And as others have said, platinum can be refinished nicely without losing material. FWIW, if I were going to let go of my 118209, it'd be for a 118206 (probably in the same config as yours); once you get used to the physical presence of pm, it's hard to go back to steel. And the extra mass of platinum really appeals to me. All to say, I think the "advantage" is a tactile/emotional one, not a practical one. |
|
9 August 2022, 12:18 AM | #19 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
|
I’ve only had one platinum Rolex, the 116506. It was great having a 50th anniversary model. Heavier than the YG Daytonas I had earlier.
But I’ve moved it onward and now have vintage DJ plus a PP & Omega as my Trinity. I never stroked my Platona so can’t say what that felt like. But I would guess that the tactile sensation was more affected by the fondler’s dermatoglyphics (i.e. whorls, arches & loops of one’s fingertips) and chemicals in the sebaceous, eccrine (sweat), and apocrine glands. High ridges and mineral content might yield a feeling of gumminess I suppose. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
9 August 2022, 12:32 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,234
|
I dunno about that lol but I agree the platinum bracelet scratches up a hell of a lot faster than any other metal.
|
9 August 2022, 02:55 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 67
|
So far my favorite explanation is the black hole on the wrist theory
I love the weight of platinum! There is nothing like it. I think that's one reason the smaller 36mm day-date is still so satisfying in this age of larger watches. The stark contrast in size to weight is very cool. I like the point about it not moving around on the wrist as much due to this increased friction - I noticed that too actually! It was a pleasant surprise. If you're gonna own this metal and wear it, seems to me OCDness has to take a back seat. It's reassuring that there's no metal loss with the scratches which are absolutely inevitable and occur quickly. |
9 August 2022, 03:02 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,976
|
I feel like I’m in a geology class with all the interesting content here. Good input on a less common metal in the watch world.
|
9 August 2022, 03:21 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: NY
Posts: 705
|
Machining characteristics may result in a different surface finish
Can’t be seen with the naked eye but can be felt with a Finger |
9 August 2022, 06:08 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Maryland
Watch: 118209
Posts: 696
|
Not that anyone asked me to dork out further on this topic, but I found myself having a brainstorm.
Vis-a-vis gold---so comparing the platinum 118206 to the gold 118209 (or 08). It occurred to me (re: my earlier post) that the question of difference in intrinsic material value has to account for the density of platinum versus gold---the fact, that is, that to make two identically-sized watches in each material, one simply needs more platinum by weight than one would need for gold. So to adjust accordingly, we don't need to look at the periodic table or anything---we can just look at the weight of each watch. The plat DD36 weighs (so the internet says) 227g. My white gold DD36 weighs 173. (I'm sure different people have different numbers, but this is a decent estimate for both.) Since I'm only looking at comparative percentages, the absolute values don't matter---and we can assume that on the 118206 and 118209, all the non-pm things (e.g. the movement and the crystal) weigh exactly the same. So we'll just compare 227 to 173, straight up. (Acknowledging that neither of those weights is entirely pm.) For platinum, it's: 227g x 95% purity x $30.25USD per gram spot price = $6,523 For 18k gold, it's: 173g x 75% purity x $57.70USD per gram spot price = $7,486 So the platinum watch is worth 87% as much as the gold when it comes to raw pm value. (Couldn't tell you how much actual platinum or gold is in each watch--doesn't matter.) The revelatory detail for me is that that 87% is very strong when one considers that gram-for-gram, platinum is only (currently) worth 52% as much as gold. This is why the density factor I mentioned above is important. I feel quite certain that much smarter, more scientifically-minded people have already made this point on this forum in much more intelligent ways. But there it is. I should acknowledge that all of this ignores the fact that Rolex's white gold uses platinum (and palladium, which is the dearest of all), but since I don't know the precise amounts, it can't really play into this. And he pushed his glasses up the bridge of his nose with smug self-satisfaction. |
9 August 2022, 09:26 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
Quote:
Now in the end does it justify the price difference? Prob not... |
|
10 August 2022, 12:06 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 5,908
|
Interesting topic.
I recently purchased a Dupont lighter, it's made of brass covered with a 20 microns palladium coating. I haven't noticed the tacky feeling described by OP, maybe because it's brass underneath or because palladium is slightly different from platinum? I also tried with the PT bezel of my Yacht-Master 116622, but being mostly sandblasted, it doesn't have enough smooth surface to appreciate the tacky aspect. Wondering if a metallurgist could possibly further elaborate on that aspect of platinum. I find the metal fascinating. I love the fact it won't tarnish (or at least not under normal use), corrode, rust or change colour over time. To me, it's the king of white metals. Other white metals try to imitate it. Take stainless steel, it corrodes eventually. Silver tarnishes big time. White gold is essentially yellow gold with white metals added to the mix to make it look white (that's cheating!). Also, it's hypoallergenic, no "dodgy" nickel here, as opposed to 904L steel. The only drawback I see is the weight. I like divers, but I doubt I'd be able to comfortably wear a platinum diver or anything above 250g. No problem in a dress watch on a leather strap, of course. |
10 August 2022, 02:10 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,293
|
Quote:
And the whole Pt being harder to work doesn't really hold water. There are lots of metals that are wayyyyy harder to work. |
|
10 August 2022, 02:36 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 71
|
I owned a Platona for years and never noticed a difference in feel compared to other metals. Currently, I own WG and SS, and, again, no difference in feel although WG definitely scratches easier than other metals.
|
10 August 2022, 02:41 AM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Merica
Posts: 1,310
|
Platinum is gummy lol?
|
10 August 2022, 02:47 AM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 10,595
|
Any Rolex bracelet with PCLs will show scratches. Best not to rub any of them as grit is just being ground in from your fingers.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.