ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 October 2012, 12:08 PM | #31 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Triad
Watch: Me go broke!!!!
Posts: 4,035
|
Ditto. I typically say never to something because I always end up doing it but I can honestly 100% say I will never buy one. Don't get the attraction. Every time I see there prices I always think man I could have a whole lot nicer Rolex for that money. But to all that do like them. It's your money. Spend it how you like. It's none of my business
|
29 October 2012, 12:19 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: J
Location: USA Midwest
Watch: Midsize Datejust
Posts: 2,611
|
|
29 October 2012, 12:20 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
The connection between the two brands goes right back to the 1940s
Rolex supplied the movements and other components to Panerai (then an Italian company - the manufacture is now in Switzerland) Nowadays Panerai and Rolex are in the same price range and seem to appeal to (broadly) the same demographics Panerai's range starts, size-wise, at 40 mm and there are plenty of great sub-44 mm models to choose from. Having both Rolex and Panerai in a collection gives a nice contrast. For example: smaller size + bracelet + automatic for a Rolex; larger size + strap + manual for a Panerai Of course there are many other great brands, but Rolex and Panerai seem to sit especially well together imho
__________________
|
29 October 2012, 12:25 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Kyle
Location: PA
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 404
|
I agree. I was exposed to Panerei shortly after joining this community and I've never understood the 'love'. However, I've learned to NEVER say never, as my taste in timepieces has shifted drastically and I don't see that ending anytime soon...Nothing against Pan lovers though! We all need a little variety in our lives !
|
29 October 2012, 12:32 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 3,764
|
I don't own one, but I think they are definitely cool-looking...very distinctive, without looking "busy." I think they have a very clean, noticeable look. I have seen three in the past few years, and every time they look noticeable but in a cool way, not in a flashy way.
This thread has prompted me to do some internet searches for watches. I stand by my Panerai comments...they look very cool to me (e.g. Luminor Marina). To contrast, the models that I don't understand the love for are most of the Breitling line (I find most too busy) and AP (don't like the angles). Obviously, it's all a matter of taste. My brother in law just got a Ford Flex, and loves it. All of us think it's ugly. |
29 October 2012, 01:02 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: New York
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,138
|
Design wise they are very appealing and have a great history, but personally I don't like them either. To me they look like a 50's wall clock. That is of course is the look nowadays, very retro chic. But I do respect the design and can see the appeal, cause there are a tremendous amount of funky looking watches out there, incongruous designs abound. You could do a lot worse! They also look good on some people I think. So given Rolexes great looks I could see where they would gravitate towards them. Nothing wrong with that.
|
29 October 2012, 01:07 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: US
Posts: 103
|
Everything said has been cool, but I agree with the OP, doesn't answer the original question, which is trying to understand the why.....Seems to be more relatability(lost on me) with this than PP, Hublot, etc....
|
29 October 2012, 01:11 PM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Watch: 1675
Posts: 1,162
|
Quote:
|
|
29 October 2012, 02:04 PM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,498
|
Diversity and variety is not necessarily a bad thing. I own and enjoy both brands very much... I guess I am easy to please!
|
29 October 2012, 02:17 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
Yes I totally agree with you.personally I like the looks of a Panerai but I don't quite get how a Panerai comes close to a Rolex in terms of quality, value and ease of resale.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
29 October 2012, 02:23 PM | #41 | |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
Quote:
I like both and have both. There are other brands I also like. I can't imagine being so brand-centric that I would only buy their watches |
|
29 October 2012, 02:27 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
I like both but only own Rolex and AP
|
29 October 2012, 02:28 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 482
|
I don't like Panerai.
|
29 October 2012, 02:31 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
|
i have tried to like the Panerai brand on multiple occasions. personally i have nothing against the brand i think that they make a great watch and I LOVE the fact that resale is good on them. sadly they just dont fit me. the 1950 case is just too big for me to pull off.
|
29 October 2012, 02:32 PM | #45 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,691
|
This is a great example - fits a need that no Rolex can...the alarm function is a nice addition to a fine watch.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
29 October 2012, 02:36 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ph
Posts: 323
|
all pams look ugly to me, except for the pam441
|
29 October 2012, 02:37 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
|
Panerai has a great history, and their watches have a unique look. However, I do not think their movements are yet manufactured to the same standard as the top tier brands.
|
29 October 2012, 02:41 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Zealand
Watch: Day Date
Posts: 1,409
|
Not a fan of Panerai, would rather go with an IWC...
|
29 October 2012, 04:29 PM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Shawn
Location: Fl
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 160
|
I've looked at them several times but they don't appeal to me...Just not my style I guess....
|
29 October 2012, 05:26 PM | #50 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Watch: Submariner LV
Posts: 580
|
opposites attract with that being said I love the Rolex nothing like it to me but it is nice to have another watch that is totally different in the lineup to change it up. Some strange so to speak..
|
29 October 2012, 05:36 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
|
not my bag - don't get it
|
29 October 2012, 06:26 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Mark
Location: *
Posts: 240
|
Different strokes for different folks. While I do see why many people are drawn to Panerais (they indeed are beautifully crafted watches), I personally would likely never own one myself mainly due to its size. Variety is what makes the world more exciting. If Rolex had a monopoly of the watch industry, I'm sure everyone would be sick of it.
|
29 October 2012, 06:41 PM | #53 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,187
|
I've got alotta love for Panerai.
|
29 October 2012, 06:57 PM | #54 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,792
|
Nothing like Panerai pix on a Rolex thread.
I have 100+ watches - I like them all. Proof is I have never sold one.
__________________
E |
29 October 2012, 07:24 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
I remember "not getting" Panerai my first few years of wearing Rolex. These days you'll very rarely catch me wearing anything but a PAM. Different strokes for different folks but no Rolex has ever brought me the level of enjoyment that my 312 or 372 have.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER |
29 October 2012, 07:27 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1,515
|
I believe a varied watch collection is the way to go. I doubt I will ever own a Panerai but I think they are very nice watches.
Rolex, AP, Patek and JLC for me. |
29 October 2012, 07:31 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 162
|
Panerai - not my cup of tea.
Having said that, that's the good thing about watches - there are all sorts to suit all people, it would be a bit boring if we all liked the same watch! |
29 October 2012, 07:37 PM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston, Texas US
Posts: 469
|
Love them or hate them, it was probably Panerai that made Rolex update their line to bigger cases. In fact probably the whole industry.
|
29 October 2012, 08:37 PM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,312
|
never liked Pams and I don't mind if others do. Not my problem.
|
29 October 2012, 08:43 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Watch: SD / LV / Daytona
Posts: 2,089
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.