The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 June 2018, 09:49 AM   #1
AdaWit711
"TRF" Member
 
AdaWit711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Adam
Location: North Carolina
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 421
Visited 3 Smaller ADs in NorCal

I was traveling this week for work and stopped in to check inventory and chat with 3 smaller ADs in Northern California. The only reason I’m posting is the consistency of the 3 stories. This may be locally dependent based on the NorCal Rolex HQ representative whom they all mentioned was consistent between the 3.

At each AD I heard the same story about the allocation system. The ADs all mentioned a specific call which they received from Rolex HQ announcing a specific allocation system based on their volume. Each AD was given a annualized volume of each professional watch they would receive. They were then instructed to take orders (differed on whether they were requiring cash to secure order) on a watch by watch basis.

For example two stated they would receive (4) 116610LV annually (the other said only 2) one at a time and to take an order for only one watch. When that watch was delivered to the consumer they could place the next watch in their allocation.

One of the ADs went into more details model by model (8) BLNRs, (2) Daytonas, (2) Skydwellers per color. Etc


Rolex also instructed all 3 ADs to not keep any of the above models in the case. These were for repeat customers only.

Once again I thought the consistency of the story was interesting.

Overall the inventory for stainless models was:

All had Explorers of all varieties, Yacht master 2, and at least two Milgauss.

Saw a bunch of two tone all models including Daytona.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AdaWit711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 09:54 AM   #2
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
I'm not surprised. Thank you for verifying what we all know is taking place.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 11:08 AM   #3
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
when this blows up im gonna laugh. rolex, patek and ap are playing a dangerous game. hope the market doesnt turn on them.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 11:08 AM   #4
Al1969
2024 Pledge Member
 
Al1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,607
Sounds like ROLEX doesn’t really want to sell watches anymore.
__________________
WG SUB-116719
GMT MASTER II 126719
Al1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 11:26 AM   #5
gregmoeck
"TRF" Member
 
gregmoeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maui
Watch: Patek
Posts: 2,032
stupid, if I was selling BMW's I would have a lot full of them
__________________
Patek 5167/1a-00
Patek 5990/1A
16610
16660
47 Swatches
gregmoeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 11:44 AM   #6
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
How can Rolex "instruct" the AD to do or what not to do with the watches. Once the AD pays the invoice, the watches belong to the AD.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 11:51 AM   #7
oldman2005
"TRF" Member
 
oldman2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
Pretty sad time to buy new SS Sport from Rolex ADs
oldman2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 12:17 PM   #8
cajerseyboy
"TRF" Member
 
cajerseyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Northern Cal
Watch: me find "the one"
Posts: 745
Which ADs did you visit?
__________________
116610LN 216570 116710BLNR 116610LV 116500LN 116519LN
cajerseyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 12:35 PM   #9
yxc145
"TRF" Member
 
yxc145's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: David
Location: Chicago
Watch: SkyD,JC, BLNR, Ex2
Posts: 1,578
I actually think Rolex is smart by doing this. They definitely make enough money. I don't double the production quantity just to meet the demand. I personally think Rolex's production number is about the same as before. The demand just went skyrocketed, which caused the shortage. By not making tons of SS sports models to fill every dealer's case, it makes those watches even more desirable. I remember 20-30 years ago. Owning a Mercedes was something special. now, they make 1000 different models, huge production numbers trying to sell to everyone. It doesn't really feel so special when you tell people you own a Mercedes anymore.
I don't think when bad economy hits again is gonna affect Rolex much since they didn't drastically increase the production when economy was good. Same quantity as before, same quantity now, same quantity in the future. I think companies that will suffer more are the ones that make huge expansion, buy machines, hiring tons of people to meet the demand. Once the demand is low, they had to let people go, sell machines, and close facilities.
yxc145 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 01:04 PM   #10
Fleetlord
"TRF" Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
when this blows up im gonna laugh. rolex, patek and ap are playing a dangerous game. hope the market doesnt turn on them.
Why? This is what consumers of luxury goods want.

For example.

Rolex, AP, Patek have limited distribution. They are cutting off dealers. They are making the product harder to get.

The result? Increased sales. Increased interest. Increased Demand. Increased brand value. All positive positive positive.

The market is feeding off of the distribution policies and the brands are becoming MORE popular and stronger.

Now, lets take Breitling or Hublot (or most of Richemont)..

The references from these brands are overproduced. If one visits a Breitling boutique is there a reference that they won't have in stock? Nope. Got them all. All 454 versions of the Navitimer....all the mutiple permutations of the Superocean. Tons and tons of them.

The market response to this?

Apathy. Uncool. Un-exclusive. Undesirable. Unsold.

Dealers are forced to dump these on the grey market just to get some cashflow.....so bad that Richemont had to offer a buy back to get their mess off the streets.

So, Rolex, AP, and Patek are clearly giving the market what it WANTS....so why would they stop limiting distribution?
Fleetlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 01:22 PM   #11
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,160
You really do know what your talking about Fleetlord. Very wise .

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 01:28 PM   #12
AdaWit711
"TRF" Member
 
AdaWit711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Adam
Location: North Carolina
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
How can Rolex "instruct" the AD to do or what not to do with the watches. Once the AD pays the invoice, the watches belong to the AD.


The ADs are given instructions on how to handle the Rolex product. They can choose not to do it but the brand is important to their overall business. I asked if it was hurting business and ALL of them said business was better this year than the past few.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AdaWit711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 01:45 PM   #13
SoCal_Batman
"TRF" Member
 
SoCal_Batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: C.R.
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: ♛ BLNR | AK
Posts: 1,029
Visited 3 Smaller ADs in NorCal

This is wild, constricting the supply is certainly driving up the demand and desire to purchase a Rolex. I'll be honest, if I walked into my AD and they had a couple BLNR's sitting in the display case, I'd be more inclined to think about it before I made a decision to purchase that day or even that week.

Now if I see one...

__________________
"The more I see, the less I know for sure." - John Lennon
SoCal_Batman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 01:57 PM   #14
kimnkk
"TRF" Member
 
kimnkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 103
Heard the same story from USA (Michigan) AD maybe 2 weeks back when i was picking up my hulk.

He said they were told by Rolex they will be getting SS Sports watches on allocation only... pretty much all SS Sports watches i recall, but he didn't qoute numbers.
kimnkk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 02:03 PM   #15
rexG
"TRF" Member
 
rexG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Rolex
Location: CA
Watch: All of them
Posts: 443
Supply..............and demand
__________________
116518LN
116610LN
126710BLRO "Pepsi"
116619LB SMURF
126334
rexG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 02:08 PM   #16
Uppersouth
"TRF" Member
 
Uppersouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Lee
Location: Kentucky
Watch: SWISS
Posts: 1,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Why? This is what consumers of luxury goods want.

For example.

Rolex, AP, Patek have limited distribution. They are cutting off dealers. They are making the product harder to get.

The result? Increased sales. Increased interest. Increased Demand. Increased brand value. All positive positive positive.

The market is feeding off of the distribution policies and the brands are becoming MORE popular and stronger.

Now, lets take Breitling or Hublot (or most of Richemont)..

The references from these brands are overproduced. If one visits a Breitling boutique is there a reference that they won't have in stock? Nope. Got them all. All 454 versions of the Navitimer....all the mutiple permutations of the Superocean. Tons and tons of them.

The market response to this?

Apathy. Uncool. Un-exclusive. Undesirable. Unsold.

Dealers are forced to dump these on the grey market just to get some cashflow.....so bad that Richemont had to offer a buy back to get their mess off the streets.

So, Rolex, AP, and Patek are clearly giving the market what it WANTS....so why would they stop limiting distribution?
I concur.
__________________
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
-ROBERT FROST
Uppersouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.