The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 September 2017, 07:12 PM   #1
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
A great video covering Zenith's revolutionary new movement.

https://youtu.be/xWh0p9Irznw
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 01:44 AM   #2
incontrol
"TRF" Member
 
incontrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
Very interesting. I am anxious to see what the accuracy and service specs are on the watches as they are delivered in 2018.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Patek Philippe
Rolex
incontrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 02:10 AM   #3
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
So am I, however in my opinion the silicone movement lacks soul. However, with the low amplitude and high frequency it should be very accurate.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 05:54 AM   #4
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight View Post
So am I, however in my opinion the silicone movement lacks soul. However, with the low amplitude and high frequency it should be very accurate.
Don't care about ultimate accuracy, if I did I would have a quartz watch, same for cars and bikes, I like old ones which have soul, my first Harley in 1989 had a carburator, my new one has injection, the old one had more soul, though the new one is more reliable or accurate if you will, my watches are new but the 40+ pieces instead of one give it the soul that these Zeniths, IMO will lack, and visually will be much less appealing
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 06:14 AM   #5
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
One of my favorite watch reporters on youtube actually. Thanks
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 07:31 AM   #6
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by lapince View Post
Don't care about ultimate accuracy, if I did I would have a quartz watch, same for cars and bikes, I like old ones which have soul, my first Harley in 1989 had a carburator, my new one has injection, the old one had more soul, though the new one is more reliable or accurate if you will, my watches are new but the 40+ pieces instead of one give it the soul that these Zeniths, IMO will lack, and visually will be much less appealing
We think alike, I still have and love my '68 BSA Spitfire with its drum brakes, carbs and points.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 07:36 AM   #7
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
One of my favorite watch reporters on youtube actually. Thanks
You are most welcome! Yes, I happened to stumble upon him while researching the movement. He has great enthusiasm combined with knowledge.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 10:07 AM   #8
GradyPhilpott
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,345
I like this development, mainly because it brings more simplicity and precision to a purely mechanical watch.

I'd like to see it in normal looking watches, though.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2017, 07:01 PM   #9
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I like this development, mainly because it brings more simplicity and precision to a purely mechanical watch.

I'd like to see it in normal looking watches, though.
Yes, it is truly an incredible horological evolution, made possible by current technology, that no doubt will lead to the production of far more accurate and inexpensive to produce (and maintain) mechanical movements, but sadly it lacks the elegance and beauty of the classic lever, balance, and balance spring movement.
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2017, 09:11 PM   #10
Arclight
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
One of my favorite watch reporters on youtube actually. Thanks
You may like Armand:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3s0...Yn5CcPgizFC5Ug
Arclight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.