The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 October 2017, 06:03 PM   #61
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
...
Star Ferry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2017, 11:03 PM   #62
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by hambone1983 View Post
this is just false. Women do not make less money than men in apples to apples comparisons. They make less money than men on average because they choose to. In the US 2/3s of doctors are men, 2/3s of lawyers are men, 89% of engineers are men, 76% in STEM professions overall are men, 92% of software engineers are men, and on and on.

Women make less because nurses make less than doctors, paralegals make less than attorneys and teachers make less than engineers.
Hmm

Then why is it that I hear over and over again that generally in the same professions not different professions that women typically make less than men?
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 October 2017, 11:27 PM   #63
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 73,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by amg55 View Post
If they will only ban the painful grunts with each shot, equal pay it is.
Have you ever heard of a guy named Raffa?
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2017, 12:40 AM   #64
Demosthene
"TRF" Member
 
Demosthene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 1,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by dddrees View Post
Hmm

Then why is it that I hear over and over again that generally in the same professions not different professions that women typically make less than men?
Because they do!

Within Australia for example women now make up 47.9% of the lawyers in the legal profession yet earn 35.6% less than men do.

Most countries have bodies that monitor gender pay gaps as well as the OECD and World Bank. There's certainly no shortage of data available.
Demosthene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2017, 12:56 AM   #65
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demosthene View Post
Because they do!

Within Australia for example women now make up 47.9% of the lawyers in the legal profession yet earn 35.6% less than men do.

Most countries have bodies that monitor gender pay gaps as well as the OECD and World Bank. There's certainly no shortage of data available.
Yeah, that’s kind of what I thought.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2017, 05:34 AM   #66
Tony64
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
Anyone know, or care to guess, if male exotic dancers get equal compensation to their female counterparts?
Tony64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2017, 10:43 AM   #67
amg55
"TRF" Member
 
amg55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Me
Location: Australia
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Have you ever heard of a guy named Raffa?
I don't watch Rafa play, period. He's too painful to watch with his pre-serve routine. It's excruciating!
amg55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2017, 07:15 PM   #68
greggsiam
"TRF" Member
 
greggsiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Gregg
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demosthene View Post
Because they do!

Within Australia for example women now make up 47.9% of the lawyers in the legal profession yet earn 35.6% less than men do.

Most countries have bodies that monitor gender pay gaps as well as the OECD and World Bank. There's certainly no shortage of data available.
No they don't, and it has been refuted many times over. The supposed 23 cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When everything is factored in, there is about a 6 cent gap which is attributed to poor negotiating skills when raises come up or during the hiring process.

It's a business and should be paid appropriately to income generated. It's funny how you don't see anyone complaining that male models make 75% less than their female counterparts.
greggsiam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2017, 07:21 PM   #69
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by hambone1983 View Post
this is just false. Women do not make less money than men in apples to apples comparisons. They make less money than men on average because they choose to. In the US 2/3s of doctors are men, 2/3s of lawyers are men, 89% of engineers are men, 76% in STEM professions overall are men, 92% of software engineers are men, and on and on.

Women make less because nurses make less than doctors, paralegals make less than attorneys and teachers make less than engineers.
you are not making an apples to apples comparison.

Women engineers make less than men engineers. Women doctors make less than men doctors. That is apples to apples. All the statistics show this. You are right that there is generally differences in professional career paths and there are more men in construction and more women in teaching but I'm not talking about that.

https://www.theengineer.co.uk/engine...0k-gender-gap/

My wife is a female engineering project manager. She makes less than some of her male subordinates not to mention her peers. She still does very well but its true. Plus she has degrees in petroleum engineering, chemical engineering, and an MBA so education level isn't a factor. The problem is if she changes jobs she has to disclose previous salary information and then will make more than before but still less than a man in the same position. Its a cycle, which is why some places specifically do not allow prospective employers to ask "how much did you make at your previous job". If you make less now then you will make less in your next job, and the next.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2017, 07:22 PM   #70
Star Ferry
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by greggsiam View Post
No they don't, and it has been refuted many times over. The supposed 23 cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When everything is factored in, there is about a 6 cent gap which is attributed to poor negotiating skills when raises come up.
6% pay gap due to gender is still wrong and should be fixed. I agree that the "77 cents" thing is false. The people who parrot it are either being intentionally dishonest or don't understand that correlation doesn't imply causation
Star Ferry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2017, 08:09 PM   #71
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by crc45 View Post
Professional sports are not games, they are businesses with a product to sell. If people are willing to pay more money for your product then you have the enjoyment of putting more money in your pocket.
/\

This
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 October 2017, 08:37 PM   #72
Demosthene
"TRF" Member
 
Demosthene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 1,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by greggsiam View Post
No they don't, and it has been refuted many times over. The supposed 23 cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When everything is factored in, there is about a 6 cent gap which is attributed to poor negotiating skills when raises come up or during the hiring process.
An opinion piece by Christina Hoff Sommers, one of the senior members of conservative think tank doesn't exactly count as a non biased source...
As I said previously it's common and immensely measurable based on vast amounts of ABS data from around 4 million employees in Australia.

There's even a nice government agency that collates and graphs the dataset's by industry!
http://data.wgea.gov.au/

The net result is the ABS and WGEA data both show a gender pay gap favouring full-time working men over full-time working women in every industry and occupational category in Australia.

Quote:
Originally Posted by greggsiam View Post
It's a business and should be paid appropriately to income generated. It's funny how you don't see anyone complaining that male models make 75% less than their female counterparts.
Oh man you've just dashed my hopes of being a male model!
I guess I'll just settle for higher pay in nearly any other industry I arbitrarily choose.
Demosthene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 October 2017, 12:37 AM   #73
cruise_bone
"TRF" Member
 
cruise_bone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 982
Tennis is unique, I think, in that the Majors are all contested at the same time and at the same Venue.
Therefore, sharing advertising revenue makes perfect sense.

Now compare Golf - men's us open vs women's us open are on different dates at different venues, with separate ticket sales and Ad revenue. Doesn't it make sense that your earnings should be based on the revenue that your specific event is making?
cruise_bone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2017, 02:19 AM   #74
APRolexguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: London
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony64 View Post
Anyone know, or care to guess, if male exotic dancers get equal compensation to their female counterparts?
They don't get one dollar bills thrown at them do they?
APRolexguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2017, 04:33 AM   #75
Honza
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Real Name: Honza
Location: Hawaii
Watch: Omega MK40, Rolex
Posts: 900
As a tennis player, I would not mind if women get a higher pay, however, when I visit various tournaments, in most cases, men gets more spectators compare to women. The more spectators tournament gets, the more potential revenue each tournament can have.

By the way, if anyone of you come to Hawaii, let me know and we can go play tennis;)
Honza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2017, 04:58 PM   #76
hasema
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: PDX
Watch: Platona
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honza View Post
As a tennis player, I would not mind if women get a higher pay, however, when I visit various tournaments, in most cases, men gets more spectators compare to women. The more spectators tournament gets, the more potential revenue each tournament can have.

By the way, if anyone of you come to Hawaii, let me know and we can go play tennis;)
Where do you live? I'll be in Maui for a week. Will be staying next to the tennis club in Wailea. i'm a average 4.5 player.

I was at the US Open this year and watching at Arthur Ashe when the women come on 75% of the stadium leaves to roam the grounds. There is more draw for men's matches. A friend made a point about women tend to buy more tennis apparel and accessories. I believe the prize money shouldn't be equal unless they are drawing equal crowds and tv rights. At the same time you can justify that womens apparel endorsements may surpass the gents.
hasema is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2017, 05:38 PM   #77
Honza
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Real Name: Honza
Location: Hawaii
Watch: Omega MK40, Rolex
Posts: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by amg55 View Post
I don't watch Rafa play, period. He's too painful to watch with his pre-serve routine. It's excruciating!
You have to agree that he got his routine down. Just saw him playing at the Laver Cup in Prague. Was a nice match.
Honza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2017, 05:44 PM   #78
Honza
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Real Name: Honza
Location: Hawaii
Watch: Omega MK40, Rolex
Posts: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by hasema View Post
Where do you live? I'll be in Maui for a week. Will be staying next to the tennis club in Wailea. i'm a average 4.5 player.

I was at the US Open this year and watching at Arthur Ashe when the women come on 75% of the stadium leaves to roam the grounds. There is more draw for men's matches. A friend made a point about women tend to buy more tennis apparel and accessories. I believe the prize money shouldn't be equal unless they are drawing equal crowds and tv rights. At the same time you can justify that womens apparel endorsements may surpass the gents.
I live in Honolulu. Wailea has nice tennis facility. If I am not mistaken USA played Fed Cup there last year.

4.5 is a great level! Maybe one day we can hit if you come back to Oahu;)
Honza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2017, 11:37 PM   #79
rolex75216
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2,008
Answering as a women I say yes.

Answering as a man I say no.
rolex75216 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2017, 11:44 PM   #80
jackjack305
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 75
They should but the reality is they don't generate as much money as mens sports
jackjack305 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2017, 11:59 PM   #81
Relentless
"TRF" Member
 
Relentless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: AL / GA
Posts: 153
Just do us all a favor and do away with the crummy sport altogether.

LOL

Sports in general are a waste of time in my opinion. YMMV.

R
Relentless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2017, 12:54 AM   #82
tamiya
"TRF" Member
 
tamiya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Willy
Location: AU, SG, MY
Posts: 1,248
Icon18

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruise_bone View Post
Tennis is unique, I think, in that the Majors are all contested at the same time and at the same Venue.
Therefore, sharing advertising revenue makes perfect sense.
I've been to AO, night session the men play then it's women. Half the stands seem to disappear after the men finish...

How would you appropriate the ad rev? Tickets sold? TV ads sold? Eyeballs?


Quote:
Now compare Golf - men's us open vs women's us open are on different dates at different venues, with separate ticket sales and Ad revenue. Doesn't it make sense that your earnings should be based on the revenue that your specific event is making?
meh rather watch a Masters on TV. familiar with some of the downunder courses but rather not be spectating there

Interesting development in ladies PGA is recent success with a few younger Asian players. They're gaining a strong following back in Asia, perhaps more/wider marketing opportunities than before there time.
tamiya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2017, 12:56 AM   #83
tamiya
"TRF" Member
 
tamiya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Willy
Location: AU, SG, MY
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
Just do us all a favor and do away with the crummy sport altogether.

LOL

Sports in general are a waste of time in my opinion. YMMV.

R
It keeps the riffraff rabble from revolting.

Did you not realise?
tamiya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2017, 12:32 AM   #84
cruise_bone
"TRF" Member
 
cruise_bone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamiya View Post
I've been to AO, night session the men play then it's women. Half the stands seem to disappear after the men finish...

How would you appropriate the ad rev? Tickets sold? TV ads sold? Eyeballs?




meh rather watch a Masters on TV. familiar with some of the downunder courses but rather not be spectating there

Interesting development in ladies PGA is recent success with a few younger Asian players. They're gaining a strong following back in Asia, perhaps more/wider marketing opportunities than before there time.

1) You allocate the Ad Revenue equally. That's why the events are held jointly.

2) Seeing The Masters in person is a highlight for any true golf fan. I'm not sure I would love seeing the US Open in person but going The Masters is a whole different experience from any other tournament that I have ever been too.
cruise_bone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2017, 03:24 AM   #85
InfinityNexus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Montreal
Posts: 84
The economist has run a few articles on this topic; here is one of the more recent ones
https://www.economist.com/blogs/grap...08/daily-chart
In a nutshell, the famous 25% discrepancy is accredited to an average of salaries across all jobs that men and women have, regardless of company, position and function. If you take a proper look at the salaries in like for like positions, the discrepancy almost disappears (in fact, if you consider that women take time off after having a child, the salaries almost match up entirely)
InfinityNexus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2017, 03:36 AM   #86
BristolCavendish
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
One sport where women will NEVER earn the same amount as men is in professional basketball. While the women often play more 'purer' game from the standpoint of conventional techniques and style, I am assuming that 90% of all basketball viewers would much rather watch the NBA over WNBA and men's NCAA basketball over women's collegiate any given day.

On the other hand, women's basketball often displays a better sense of teamwork and commitment to a common goal.
BristolCavendish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2017, 03:50 AM   #87
imperio
"TRF" Member
 
imperio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: this space
Posts: 1,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by APRolexguy View Post
sensitive topic alert! what do you guys think?

would be interesting to hear what the women on TRF think about this as well?

article here https://kijanawaasi.com/female-tenni...ers-equal-pay/

"Imagine your co-worker, who does half the work and delivers less than half the numbers you deliver crying that they want your pay"
The topic is a little misleading. Yes, everyone deserves "equal pay" regardless of gender. Perhaps it should read "an equal pay rate".
imperio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2017, 03:56 AM   #88
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
Just do us all a favor and do away with the crummy sport altogether.

LOL

Sports in general are a waste of time in my opinion. YMMV.

R
Tennis is a great sport. I like golf too, and sailing and boating. Without such pursuits life may not be as fun.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2017, 04:39 AM   #89
izamore3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 54
I think they should but numbers don't lie - they just don't generate as much money as mens.
izamore3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 October 2017, 05:20 AM   #90
Tony64
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by BristolCavendish View Post
One sport where women will NEVER earn the same amount as men is in professional basketball. While the women often play more 'purer' game from the standpoint of conventional techniques and style, I am assuming that 90% of all basketball viewers would much rather watch the NBA over WNBA and men's NCAA basketball over women's collegiate any given day.

On the other hand, women's basketball often displays a better sense of teamwork and commitment to a common goal.
True enough BC, but how many people even know the name of their own city's WNBA team let alone name a player on it?

Heck, how many know if their city even has a WNBA team?


Tony64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.