ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jman2 · 15 February 2015, 03:21 PM

notice that there is not too much forum actions on seawolves, is it bc of the weight and size of this monster that deters ppl from its purchase?

AK797 · 16 February 2015, 01:14 AM

I had one, loved the yellow dial but yes it was pretty thick, I preferred the Steelfish.

jcd · 16 February 2015, 02:04 AM

I have one. I love it! Yeah, it is thick, but I find it quite comfortable. I traded a Seiko MM300 toward it and that was thick as well. But it was much less comfortable, IMHO. I feel like the Seawolf wears smaller than it actually is. Although, it certainly doesn't go under a cuff well.

HogwldFLTR · 16 February 2015, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jman2

notice that there is not too much forum actions on seawolves, is it bc of the weight and size of this monster that deters ppl from its purchase?

On a Rolex forum there isn't really too much action on things non-Rolex. Welcome to the forum and post some pictures of your wolf. There are Ti and Steel Seawolves with different dials so an image would be nice. I just recently bought a Steefish which I like.

le_baron · 17 February 2015, 07:20 AM

For me the thickness is the deterrent

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jman2 · 17 February 2015, 09:18 AM

dont own one either, was eye balling a superocean 42, then learned about the seawolf. went to AD but was a bit too big on wrist. then i started seeing DJ2 in SS and liked that one... kind of all over the page haaaaaa but when i was researching seawolfs noticed that not many ppl talk about it.... guess u just need to have a large enough wrist to support this... but i really do like it it on a black baton dial on ocean racer and deployment strap... looks so sexy... perhaps i just need to get in shape so i can pull off the wolf!!

Xenophon · 20 February 2015, 05:32 AM

I've had a couple them. In the end, just too thick for me (just like the DSSD)

15 February 2015, 03:21 PM	#1
jman2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: canada Posts: 11	seawolfs notice that there is not too much forum actions on seawolves, is it bc of the weight and size of this monster that deters ppl from its purchase?

17 February 2015, 07:20 AM	#5
le_baron "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Long Island, NY Posts: 257	For me the thickness is the deterrent Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Lange Lange 1 ref. 191.021 \| Audemars Piguet Royal Oak ref. 15500 \| Breguet Classique ref. 5177BB \| Glashütte Original Panoreserve \| Breitling Navitimer 01 Limited Edition

16 February 2015, 01:14 AM	#2
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,237	I had one, loved the yellow dial but yes it was pretty thick, I preferred the Steelfish.

16 February 2015, 02:04 AM	#3
jcd "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Jack Location: Wisconsin Watch: me vector Posts: 1,152	I have one. I love it! Yeah, it is thick, but I find it quite comfortable. I traded a Seiko MM300 toward it and that was thick as well. But it was much less comfortable, IMHO. I feel like the Seawolf wears smaller than it actually is. Although, it certainly doesn't go under a cuff well.

17 February 2015, 09:18 AM	#6
jman2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: canada Posts: 11	dont own one either, was eye balling a superocean 42, then learned about the seawolf. went to AD but was a bit too big on wrist. then i started seeing DJ2 in SS and liked that one... kind of all over the page haaaaaa but when i was researching seawolfs noticed that not many ppl talk about it.... guess u just need to have a large enough wrist to support this... but i really do like it it on a black baton dial on ocean racer and deployment strap... looks so sexy... perhaps i just need to get in shape so i can pull off the wolf!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)