ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

marie · 27 March 2010, 12:06 AM

And the dot (I know that's not the correct term, but my mind is drawing a blank) in the triangle looks small...

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...item4a9fc2adaa

TimeToGo · 27 March 2010, 12:15 AM

The seller claims the serial is in the 1.7 mil series.

My eyesight is not the greatest and I can not see ONE number on that case. Maybe it is the angle he took the pictures from...

The pearl appears to have fallen from the bezel...

marie · 27 March 2010, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimeToGo

The seller claims the serial is in the 1.7 mil series.

My eyesight is not the greatest and I can not see ONE number on that case. Maybe it is the angle he took the pictures from...

The pearl appears to have fallen from the bezel...

Agreed, I didn't see a single stamp mark on it anywhere either...and I am not sure it has anything to do with the picture angle

TheBluePrince · 27 March 2010, 12:23 AM

Pearl has fallen out which is common. Some people prefer them sans pearl. (me included).

Looks like the numbers between the lugs have been photoshopped out in the pics. I have asked seller about it.

marie · 27 March 2010, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBluePrince

Pearl has fallen out which is common. Some people prefer them sans pearl. (me included).

Looks like the numbers between the lugs have been photoshopped out in the pics. I have asked seller about it.

Thanks for following up on it for me

TheBluePrince · 27 March 2010, 02:30 AM

Seller confirms photoshopped pics for security and all numbers are clearly visable on the watch in actuality.

AuMDLST · 27 March 2010, 04:21 AM

I can understand PS'ing the Serial number but why the model?

TheBluePrince · 27 March 2010, 04:22 AM

Dunno! My pet hate/bugbear is people blurring out Ltd edition numbers on watches which is absolutely 100% pointless.

27 March 2010, 12:06 AM	#1
marie "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: San Antonio Watch: UN Starry Night Posts: 2,150	Shouldn't there be stamped numbers visible here And the dot (I know that's not the correct term, but my mind is drawing a blank) in the triangle looks small... http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...item4a9fc2adaa __________________

27 March 2010, 04:21 AM	#7
AuMDLST "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Texas Watch: All of them Posts: 162	Photoshop I can understand PS'ing the Serial number but why the model?

27 March 2010, 12:15 AM	#2
TimeToGo 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,589	The seller claims the serial is in the 1.7 mil series. My eyesight is not the greatest and I can not see ONE number on that case. Maybe it is the angle he took the pictures from... The pearl appears to have fallen from the bezel...

27 March 2010, 12:23 AM	#4
TheBluePrince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: London Posts: 2,081	Pearl has fallen out which is common. Some people prefer them sans pearl. (me included). Looks like the numbers between the lugs have been photoshopped out in the pics. I have asked seller about it.

27 March 2010, 02:30 AM	#6
TheBluePrince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: London Posts: 2,081	Seller confirms photoshopped pics for security and all numbers are clearly visable on the watch in actuality.

27 March 2010, 04:22 AM	#8
TheBluePrince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: London Posts: 2,081	Dunno! My pet hate/bugbear is people blurring out Ltd edition numbers on watches which is absolutely 100% pointless.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)