ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mcjp6 · 25 March 2010, 08:09 PM

still learning about bands here but the coronet on the face of the clasp and the scroll work on the reverse of the clasp look fake to me.

seller trixee00 ( 941)

A genuine steel oyster Rolex bracelet for a submariner 93250. The bracelet has 17 links in the middle of the bracelet and can be sized by moving them along the clasp area, the bracelet measures just over 7 inches. It has original side sprung bars connecting watch case and bracelet. Rolex 93250 on either end of the links, sprung bars included. Please see photos as to the condition, there are no repairs and the bracelet is not stretched.This bracelet was on a Rolex watch and there are a few surface scratches but nothing major and could be easily polished. Low starting price for a quality Rolex item. Weight is 64.3grms.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/GENUINE-ROLEX-...item51916cf0c1

mcjp6 · 26 March 2010, 11:03 AM

anyone have any views??

Earl Camembert · 26 March 2010, 11:34 AM

Odd scroll work as both bulbs are on the top line on ether side of the crown. Also the crown on the outside of the clasp looks too long; that said with all of the odd bands that are Rolex I don't know for sure.

AuMDLST · 26 March 2010, 11:41 AM

There appears to be some sort of protrusion on the flip lock
Never seen that before

Johny · 26 March 2010, 08:53 PM

pre sel spring bars ?

idk01 · 26 March 2010, 09:59 PM

Scroll work on the inner folding clasp looks right to me, thats one hell of a well worn bracelet :-)

I think the photos of that clasp have been stretched wide, it looks way longer than normal :-)

Earl Camembert · 27 March 2010, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idk01

Scroll work on the inner folding clasp looks right to me, thats one hell of a well worn bracelet :-)

So the bottom line to the left of the crown had been worn away and the bulb is not on the top line?

TheBluePrince · 27 March 2010, 06:19 AM

Crown on the outside of the clasp looks good/clear.

I'm never sure on these bracelets; the good copies are so good these days and we all know that even the orginal Rolex one's aren't the best quality anyway.

TheBluePrince · 27 March 2010, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AuMDLST

There appears to be some sort of protrusion on the flip lock
Never seen that before

Just looked on the web and seen another couple like that. I think the very early SEL 93250's had this as well as the stamping/numbers on the last bracelet link. Modern/newer one's have neither of these features.

26 March 2010, 09:59 PM	#6
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	Scroll work on the inner folding clasp looks right to me, thats one hell of a well worn bracelet :-) I think the photos of that clasp have been stretched wide, it looks way longer than normal :-) __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

26 March 2010, 11:03 AM	#2
mcjp6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: VK2 - AUS Watch: 5513s Posts: 7,380	anyone have any views??

26 March 2010, 11:34 AM	#3
Earl Camembert Banned Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: New Jersey Posts: 1,858	Odd scroll work as both bulbs are on the top line on ether side of the crown. Also the crown on the outside of the clasp looks too long; that said with all of the odd bands that are Rolex I don't know for sure.

26 March 2010, 11:41 AM	#4
AuMDLST "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Texas Watch: All of them Posts: 162	There appears to be some sort of protrusion on the flip lock Never seen that before

26 March 2010, 08:53 PM	#5
Johny "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: john Location: Scotland Watch: sub 16610Lv Posts: 13,523	pre sel spring bars ?

27 March 2010, 06:19 AM	#8
TheBluePrince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: London Posts: 2,081	Crown on the outside of the clasp looks good/clear. I'm never sure on these bracelets; the good copies are so good these days and we all know that even the orginal Rolex one's aren't the best quality anyway.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)