ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 January 2011, 08:01 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Matt
Location: new hampshire
Watch: Rlx,Omga,CyS,brtln
Posts: 1,520
|
lume question?
So I asked this in the general thread but maybe here is better? I was talking to a watch repair man and he said on the gmt II's and sub's not to buy anything older than 2001 because the lume will be dead? He said they had a bad run of dials? Does this sound accurate? Sorry I know this is a total newb question but I am a newb And in the market for one of the two soon.
__________________
R.I.P. Smoke em' if you got em' |
29 January 2011, 08:23 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Rolex made the switch from tritium to luminova circa 1998-1999. Tritium has a half-life of about 12 1/2 years so their luminosity is either gone or much less than what it once was.
For a brief period (around 2000) Rolex used luminova-didn't seem to be as intense as superluminova. I don't think it was a "bad run" of dials. Simply not what it is today (lot's of debate on how good it is compared to other brands, but that's another story) If the watch has a tritium dial and depending on the year/model it can be worth many times it's original price. I would take his statement with a small grain of salt. |
29 January 2011, 08:36 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Matt
Location: new hampshire
Watch: Rlx,Omga,CyS,brtln
Posts: 1,520
|
thank you
__________________
R.I.P. Smoke em' if you got em' |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.