ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

~JJ · 27 November 2012, 11:06 AM

I was just looking at older references and this one sees off... http://forums.watchnet.com/index.php...o=584166&rid=0

TimeToGo · 27 November 2012, 11:12 AM

It is a 6542, not a 1675. Hmmm!

Definitely better pictures are in order.

springer · 27 November 2012, 11:18 AM

For starters, the dial is refinished and the caseback is "toast." The bezel looks like an aftermarket replacement too. Not much good going on with this vintage Rolex.

~JJ · 27 November 2012, 11:30 AM

The coronet being so off centered on the crown seems odd too.

77T · 27 November 2012, 12:07 PM

Also has the 1036 in a 1958? Thought they had gone to 106x sometime in '56?

crowncollection · 27 November 2012, 12:25 PM

i concur the watch is not one to throw your money into, keep it for another one, to many problems

mrbill2mrbill2 · 27 November 2012, 09:34 PM

Run Forrest Run!!

27 November 2012, 11:06 AM	#1
~JJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Chicago Watch: explorer Posts: 2,140	GMT seems off I was just looking at older references and this one sees off... http://forums.watchnet.com/index.php...o=584166&rid=0

27 November 2012, 11:18 AM	#3
springer 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,230	For starters, the dial is refinished and the caseback is "toast." The bezel looks like an aftermarket replacement too. Not much good going on with this vintage Rolex. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

27 November 2012, 12:07 PM	#5
77T 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 40,900	Also has the 1036 in a 1958? Thought they had gone to 106x sometime in '56? __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

27 November 2012, 12:25 PM	#6
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,164	i concur the watch is not one to throw your money into, keep it for another one, to many problems __________________ watches many

27 November 2012, 09:34 PM	#7
mrbill2mrbill2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Mr. Bill Location: South Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 6,148	Run Forrest Run!! __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13

27 November 2012, 11:12 AM	#2
TimeToGo 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,614	It is a 6542, not a 1675. Hmmm! Definitely better pictures are in order.

27 November 2012, 11:30 AM	#4
~JJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Chicago Watch: explorer Posts: 2,140	The coronet being so off centered on the crown seems odd too.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)