The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 August 2017, 10:09 PM   #1
BubbleDate
"TRF" Member
 
BubbleDate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Outback Australia
Watch: Datejust 36
Posts: 88
Am I the only one? Vintage Datejust

Hi all...

I am looking to buy my 3rd, and probably my last Rolex.

I was set to buy a Datejust, as I love them. A new 36mm 116234 or 116200, but I also waited 2 years for Datejust 41 in steel to come out so I could try it on, as everyone tells me the 36 is a girls size now.

I was so excited. Finally I could afford a new and serious Rolex. After a couple of years of research, I must say I am somewhat disappointed. I found Datejust II too big lug to lug and case diameter wise. I tried on Datejust 41 a few days ago and while it fitted me fine it seemed too thin- it seemed to lack presence and wasn't masculine enough, compared to the vintage Datejusts.


I understand that Rolex slowly evolves their models, but I found myself looking for classic features in the new Datejust watches, that seem to be either absent or increasingly becoming absent, for whatever reasons. Maybe production costs probably being a main one. Features like raised crystals, lug holes and lumed dials (that still looked beautiful), without resorting to non-lumed Roman dials. I found myself thinking, they should give the new Datejust a raised/ domed crystal and lume again. They should also keep the top of the bracelet and lugs brushed and polish the sides of the case and bracelet and the bezel, just like the new OP 36 is and prior Datejusts were. They should have kept the lug shape the same on the new 36 too, it curves down too much at the ends, as if to cater only to women now, whereas n 16200 and prior models it fitted everyone. They should also bring back the clasp on the Jubilee bracelet for the 36. I saw a guy wearing a 116234 and didn't believe him it was a Rolex for that reason and I owned Rolexes! The new large flat crystal with the cyclops lense on the new Datejusts 41 and II also just doesn't look right to me. It just doesn't suit Rolex to be contemporary.

You cant really get these features anymore on a Datejust. IMO they have wrecked the new Datejusts. The new OP 39mm was a good watch but they added coloured pips to the dial. They should base Datejust around this watch IMO. The only thing I like about the newer Datejust 36 are the larger hands. They are great.

I guess what I am asking is am I the only one who can buy a new Rolex, but would rather buy a vintage one instead, because of details like this? I would be interested to hear peoples thought on this.

I know vintage Datejust watches can be hard to source, especially with original bracelets in good condition. Lastly if anyone can recommend any good vintage dealers, I'd appreciate it. I would like to find a 100% original, unpolished example if possible with original bracelet. Thanks in advance.
BubbleDate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2017, 10:45 PM   #2
Toronto Soup King
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Pete
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: 1016.
Posts: 688
That's an interesting breakdown, thank you. I agree with your points and applaud your attention to detail - last time I was in the AD the OP36 was the only new watch I liked, too! I'd have bought one, but I can't justify a new model taking over a rotation spot from a vintage watch, I have too many already. And I think I still like the older ones a little more - acrylic for me, mostly.

I'm not as big of a DJ fan as I am a fan of non-sport non-date models, but we're agreed on the cases I think. Call me a girl if you like but I like the 36mm watches, they're great
Toronto Soup King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2017, 11:28 PM   #3
GGGMT
2024 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,088
That's a good analysis, and one with which I agree. Like many here, on the vintage forum, I feel that the new Rolexes have become garish and chunky. The last new Rolex I bought was in 1995. I love the vintage date just and have bought several of them. (I always buy with original box and papers, though many or most don't care about that). For me, They are size appropriate, feel good, look is crisp and disciplined.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2017, 11:49 PM   #4
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
Just get an old one. Done. Massive thread with vetted vintage dealers in this forum.
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 02:16 AM   #5
Tom1675
"TRF" Member
 
Tom1675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by BubbleDate View Post
Hi all...




I guess what I am asking is am I the only one who can buy a new Rolex, but would rather buy a vintage one instead, because of details like this? I would be interested to hear peoples thought on this.

I know vintage Datejust watches can be hard to source, especially with original bracelets in good condition. Lastly if anyone can recommend any good vintage dealers, I'd appreciate it. I would like to find a 100% original, unpolished example if possible with original bracelet. Thanks in advance.[/QUOTE]

Everyone on this forum prefers vintage and is happy to discuss any candidates for your purchase no mater what the reference.

Also, use the sales forum here to purchase and know that there are plenty of vintage references that are tough to find, Datejust isn't one of them. Be patient and hold out for THE ONE!
Tom1675 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 02:23 AM   #6
BubbleDate
"TRF" Member
 
BubbleDate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Outback Australia
Watch: Datejust 36
Posts: 88
Thanks guys. I didn't expect my OCD thoughts to receive such positive feedback

Toronto Soup King: Sounds like you have a great collection. I'm happy to hear you approve of the new OP 36, and yes the acrylic crystal vintage pieces are great and seem quite popular from what I've seen online. On sports models, the new Sub No Date is within my budget, just. I haven't ruled it out, but I'd prefer a watch with the date. Maybe I'm missing the point with this watch, (and it having no date) if you know what I mean. Anyway, half the fun is finding the right watch I guess

Vincent65: I'll check out the vetted vintage thread, thank you.
BubbleDate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 03:45 AM   #7
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,423
Tom, since you asked!.... I see the new, sterile, designed-with-computer-software, cookie-cutter Rolexes as completely different, and far far lesser animals than vintage models. May as well be two different companies.
And speaking of new Rolexes, don't even get me started on the General Forum here! ("Let's See Your Rolex with Your Favorite Single Malt, Monogrammed Dress Shirt, Steering Wheel of your Luxury Car!"
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 04:59 AM   #8
GGGMT
2024 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
Tom, since you asked!.... I see the new, sterile, designed-with-computer-software, cookie-cutter Rolexes as completely different, and far far lesser animals than vintage models. May as well be two different companies.

This!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 05:00 AM   #9
javier
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Argentina
Posts: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by BubbleDate View Post
Hi all...

I am looking to buy my 3rd, and probably my last Rolex.

I was set to buy a Datejust, as I love them. A new 36mm 116234 or 116200, but I also waited 2 years for Datejust 41 in steel to come out so I could try it on, as everyone tells me the 36 is a girls size now.

I was so excited. Finally I could afford a new and serious Rolex. After a couple of years of research, I must say I am somewhat disappointed. I found Datejust II too big lug to lug and case diameter wise. I tried on Datejust 41 a few days ago and while it fitted me fine it seemed too thin- it seemed to lack presence and wasn't masculine enough, compared to the vintage Datejusts.


I understand that Rolex slowly evolves their models, but I found myself looking for classic features in the new Datejust watches, that seem to be either absent or increasingly becoming absent, for whatever reasons. Maybe production costs probably being a main one. Features like raised crystals, lug holes and lumed dials (that still looked beautiful), without resorting to non-lumed Roman dials. I found myself thinking, they should give the new Datejust a raised/ domed crystal and lume again. They should also keep the top of the bracelet and lugs brushed and polish the sides of the case and bracelet and the bezel, just like the new OP 36 is and prior Datejusts were. They should have kept the lug shape the same on the new 36 too, it curves down too much at the ends, as if to cater only to women now, whereas n 16200 and prior models it fitted everyone. They should also bring back the clasp on the Jubilee bracelet for the 36. I saw a guy wearing a 116234 and didn't believe him it was a Rolex for that reason and I owned Rolexes! The new large flat crystal with the cyclops lense on the new Datejusts 41 and II also just doesn't look right to me. It just doesn't suit Rolex to be contemporary.

You cant really get these features anymore on a Datejust. IMO they have wrecked the new Datejusts. The new OP 39mm was a good watch but they added coloured pips to the dial. They should base Datejust around this watch IMO. The only thing I like about the newer Datejust 36 are the larger hands. They are great.

I guess what I am asking is am I the only one who can buy a new Rolex, but would rather buy a vintage one instead, because of details like this? I would be interested to hear peoples thought on this.

I know vintage Datejust watches can be hard to source, especially with original bracelets in good condition. Lastly if anyone can recommend any good vintage dealers, I'd appreciate it. I would like to find a 100% original, unpolished example if possible with original bracelet. Thanks in advance.
By the way, I have 2 Rolex vintage for sale. Datejust 16030 and a Turnograph 1625. Both in perfect conditions. jalvarez@grupoagv.com.ar
javier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 05:12 AM   #10
onthedial
"TRF" Member
 
onthedial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
@Bubbledate
Re: "I know vintage Datejust watches can be hard to source..."
Actually, finding a vintage DJ in very good condition is not that difficult, as millions were produced. I'm sure with a little patience you will locate one to your liking quite soon.
Enjoy the hunt!
___________
Instagram: @onthedial
onthedial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 05:21 AM   #11
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
Tom, since you asked!.... I see the new, sterile, designed-with-computer-software, cookie-cutter Rolexes as completely different, and far far lesser animals than vintage models. May as well be two different companies.
And speaking of new Rolexes, don't even get me started on the General Forum here! ("Let's See Your Rolex with Your Favorite Single Malt, Monogrammed Dress Shirt, Steering Wheel of your Luxury Car!"
I'm still waiting for the... "can I bowl with my new Rolex" thread!!!
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 05:50 AM   #12
tamiya
"TRF" Member
 
tamiya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Willy
Location: AU, SG, MY
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
I'm still waiting for the... "can I bowl with my new Rolex" thread!!!
Lawn bowls or 10-pin?

Just being mindful of typical age here...
tamiya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 06:06 AM   #13
Gina Marie
"TRF" Member
 
Gina Marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
I like the direction they are going. I have had a new 36 dj with the sj bracelet and liked it. I have had a 92 dj and liked it as well as a 62 and 68 tog. However, they are too small imho. Punted them all except what the wife grabbed. They remind me of a small omega.....looks cool but a little dated. I like the new subs and exploreres but that us as big as i go. Had a pani but that was horrid.
Gina Marie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 05:25 PM   #14
BubbleDate
"TRF" Member
 
BubbleDate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Outback Australia
Watch: Datejust 36
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthedial View Post
@Bubbledate
Re: "I know vintage Datejust watches can be hard to source..."
Actually, finding a vintage DJ in very good condition is not that difficult, as millions were produced. I'm sure with a little patience you will locate one to your liking quite soon.
Enjoy the hunt!
___________
Instagram: @onthedial


Thanks. I've been hearing this. Definitely not in a rush and enjoying the search

I was amazed to hear some of the comments here. I was interested to hear that the overall quality and attention to detail of Rolex was better in earlier years. (BTW, I am not a fan of the counterfeit inspired engraved renhaut on newer models either and like the sterile look).

One thing I noticed with my first Rolex, a 70's two tone (champagne) Datejust I had in the 90's was when I screwed the crown in, the crown signature image was always displayed in the upright position. Quirky I know, but this fascinated me at the time. I don't see this with the newer Rolexes.
BubbleDate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2017, 06:19 PM   #15
tamiya
"TRF" Member
 
tamiya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Willy
Location: AU, SG, MY
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by BubbleDate View Post
One thing I noticed with my first Rolex, a 70's two tone (champagne) Datejust I had in the 90's was when I screwed the crown in, the crown signature image was always displayed in the upright position. Quirky I know, but this fascinated me at the time. I don't see this with the newer Rolexes.
Yours would be a fluke more than intentional.

That feature is a myth much like the various fanciful mythical driver-aid modcons a RollsRoyce is meant to have.
tamiya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2017, 02:23 AM   #16
jdmi32
"TRF" Member
 
jdmi32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Ky
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 16570
Posts: 2,362
I tried on the DJ 41 with a jubilee bracelet recently and quite liked it. Much better than the DJ II, IMO. Just can't get past the polished lugs on most of the new models, though.
jdmi32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2017, 03:03 AM   #17
daveo5
"TRF" Member
 
daveo5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Las Vegas NV
Watch: 14060M COSC
Posts: 1,329
'Girls' size. In this confusing era better say, 'ladies'. Rolex says ladies. Date just models for decades were of three sizes: 26mm ladies, 30mm mid-size, and 36mm. Several tool models in 40mm. I have a mid seventies 1630 date just. The crown on the winding stem is straight up. The gold is 14 k. That was usually indicative of the US market.
daveo5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2017, 03:02 PM   #18
BubbleDate
"TRF" Member
 
BubbleDate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Outback Australia
Watch: Datejust 36
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamiya View Post
Yours would be a fluke more than intentional.

That feature is a myth much like the various fanciful mythical driver-aid modcons a RollsRoyce is meant to have.

You absolutely sure? Mine was a 70's model like Daveo's here and the crown sat true when screwed in too.
BubbleDate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2017, 03:25 PM   #19
BubbleDate
"TRF" Member
 
BubbleDate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Outback Australia
Watch: Datejust 36
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toronto Soup King View Post
That's an interesting breakdown, thank you. I agree with your points and applaud your attention to detail - last time I was in the AD the OP36 was the only new watch I liked, too! I'd have bought one, but I can't justify a new model taking over a rotation spot from a vintage watch, I have too many already. And I think I still like the older ones a little more - acrylic for me, mostly.

I'm not as big of a DJ fan as I am a fan of non-sport non-date models, but we're agreed on the cases I think. Call me a girl if you like but I like the 36mm watches, they're great

Thanks. I understand your position on OP 36

This time around I think I am going to go for a DJ, one of the last acrylic (domed) crystal models similar to yours from 1986-1987 in steel engine s/s turned or fluted Seems to offer everything I like

I think vintage is technically 1963 and earlier, but do you know if 'vintage pieces' and from what year or in general are technically still water proof rated? I am reading vintage shouldn't be exposed to water (depths/ and atmospheric pressures like swimming). I guess its a subjective question and depend on a pressure test at the dealer, but I was just wondering if there were any other reasons vintage pieces are not recommended in or around water.

I like the Sub No Date as well, but I just seem to like the DJ better. It was different when I was younger though. I am in my mid 40's now.
BubbleDate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2017, 12:30 AM   #20
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,800
Just get a vintage DJ. Still your best bang-for-buck vintage Rolex. I've tried on the new 41mm version and it did nothing for me. The fluted bezel is way too blingy, and the polished bezel is way too wide. And I can't stand the Roman numerals that ring the dials on the newer 36mm versions.

Stick to the acrylic crystal DJs. So many options. And there's nothing "girlie" about them. They're classic, and very versatile. They look great on a Jubliee, Oyster or just a simple leather strap.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DJ-TRF (1).jpg (290.3 KB, 478 views)
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2017, 12:56 AM   #21
teb1013
"TRF" Member
 
teb1013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Easton PA
Posts: 581
I don't know if my 1991 x model 16233 DJ counts as "vintage" but I bought it last year for a virtual song (as Rolexes go) got it serviced (by Watch Buyers Group) and it is as beautiful and runs as well as a new watch. I see nothing "girly" about it or its 36mm size. In fact my 41mm Black Bay (a different animal than a DJ I know) is at the very outer limit of what I can wear. I don't want a DJ that size. As has been commented there are lots of older DJs available that with a little TLC will last a lifetime. The original post and all the comments are interesting. I like the detail and consideration everyone puts in to their posts. My crown does sit upright, BTW.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
teb1013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2017, 04:12 AM   #22
GGGMT
2024 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,088
Older DJs rock badly. Here's my ~1987. Goes with everything, looks tight and professional and gives a tip of the hat to its earlier brethren of the 60s and 70s




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2017, 04:43 AM   #23
Adambrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Leicester
Posts: 93
Great feed & I love my 1973 36mm Datejust. I've got much bigger watches but prefer this one as it's the perfect size & fit for any occasion


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Adambrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2017, 05:09 AM   #24
GGGMT
2024 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adambrown View Post
Great feed & I love my 1973 36mm Datejust. I've got much bigger watches

Great looking watch! Is that a gray dial?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2017, 05:15 AM   #25
august1410
"TRF" Member
 
august1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Joe
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 1983 15003
Posts: 626
I have a 1983 15003 (18K/SS Date) and it it 34mm. I have smaller wrists (6.5-6.75 in) and I like my watches to fit snugly. The 34mm size of the date is just perfect. It is, as Rolex states plainly, a men's watch.

The notion that a 34-36 mm watch is just for women is ridiculous, in my opinion. Of course, there are folks who where Invicta watches that weigh a pound and have a crystal the size of a serving platter.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg rolex.jpg (48.2 KB, 469 views)
__________________
“The timid man yearns for full value and asks for a tenth. The bold man strikes for double value and compromises on par.” - Mark Twain
august1410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2017, 05:45 AM   #26
Adambrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Leicester
Posts: 93
Am I the only one? Vintage Datejust

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGGMT View Post
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Thanks & yes it's a gray sunburst dial. Really like the blue dial you have as well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Adambrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2017, 11:53 PM   #27
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adambrown View Post
Great feed & I love my 1973 36mm Datejust. I've got much bigger watches but prefer this one as it's the perfect size & fit for any occasion
Thats's a handsome classic
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2017, 08:02 AM   #28
Adambrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Leicester
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent65 View Post
Thats's a handsome classic


Thanks Vincent65 you can't beat a classic


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Adambrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2017, 12:18 PM   #29
BubbleDate
"TRF" Member
 
BubbleDate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Outback Australia
Watch: Datejust 36
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Just get a vintage DJ. Still your best bang-for-buck vintage Rolex. I've tried on the new 41mm version and it did nothing for me. The fluted bezel is way too blingy, and the polished bezel is way too wide. And I can't stand the Roman numerals that ring the dials on the newer 36mm versions.

Stick to the acrylic crystal DJs. So many options. And there's nothing "girlie" about them. They're classic, and very versatile. They look great on a Jubliee, Oyster or just a simple leather strap.


Beautiful watch Swish77... They're all beautiful. Maybe its just me, but I notice the smooth bezel models seem highly sought after in vintage. Condition is amazing given the passage of time Thanks for the tips. After much consideration I will source another acrylic vintage ;)

While I appreciate Rolex had a very difficult time trying to incorporate lume on the new stick dials, I feel the new 'lume filled sticks' on the new Datejusts lose the shiny batons the vintage models have. Also on the new white faced model you can barely see the batons- while they are still very nice this just looks a little awkward IMO
BubbleDate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2017, 12:24 AM   #30
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Chaps

Anything between 36mm and 41mm is fine on a Rolex, in fact I rate it as a non issue.

I would guess a 36mm Datejust slides under a shirt cuff much better than a 41mm model.

So just buy what you are happy with and then relax and enjoy it.

Regards

Mick
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.