The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 August 2011, 04:46 AM   #1
vmm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Posts: 171
Thoughts on this 1675?

Hi all,

I'm a newbie to the forum but have gotten the vintage bug and I wanted to get some opinions on this watch. It's a 3,xxx,xxx serial. Was curious about the lume, dial and hands and whether or not the case/band have been polished. Many thanks to all.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1675 3mil (9).jpg (109.1 KB, 833 views)
File Type: jpg 1675 3mil (8).jpg (99.4 KB, 828 views)
File Type: jpg 1675 3mil (17)a.jpg (195.9 KB, 829 views)
File Type: jpg 1675 3mil (6)a.jpg (245.2 KB, 825 views)
File Type: jpg 1675 3mil (13)a.jpg (210.3 KB, 834 views)
File Type: jpg 1675 3mil (4)a.jpg (206.0 KB, 829 views)
__________________
Tag 2000, Tag F1 Quartz Chronograph, Omega Deville ,Omega Seamaster, Tag Carerra Automatic,
Raymond Weil Tango, Bathys Acquaculture Automatic
Doxa SUB 800 Ti Pro., Bathys Benthic Titanium, Doxa 1923 Jugendstil, Doxa SUB 1000T Divingstar, Rolex 116710,Suunto T6C, PAM 113, Rolex14060m, Rolex16750.
vmm is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 05:10 AM   #2
1675-David
"TRF" Member
 
1675-David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,015
Looks very nice, there is a great dial reference here http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=74976
written by Orchi which is really useful. I'm sure some of the Forums real experts will chime in with their comments soon.
1675-David is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 06:12 AM   #3
Keeperoftime
"TRF" Member
 
Keeperoftime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,732
Very nice example. I would have to assume it's completely overhauled... or maybe brand new old stock :)
Keeperoftime is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 06:14 AM   #4
pawnshopkiller
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Roscoe
Location: florida
Watch: 16618
Posts: 646
You couldn't ask for a better example. this should fetch a premium.
pawnshopkiller is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 06:22 AM   #5
pdoukas
"TRF" Member
 
pdoukas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
That's a gorgeous MK1 Matte dial, notice the long E and L in the word Rolex. Matching tritium hands! Patina looks very nice on both plots and hands. Case looks to be polished, but I see a little chamfer on the lugs. It's hard to tell because of the angles and light. As for the band, it is a C&I made for rolex. Others with more knowledge will chime in soon o be patient. In the meantime, ask seller about the end link numbers and also about the stretch of the band.

Looking at it again, I can see the band is dated to 73 which matches a 3Xmillion serial. Band is possibly original to watch. That's a good find!


Pete

Last edited by pdoukas; 19 August 2011 at 06:25 AM.. Reason: 2nd opinion
pdoukas is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 06:44 AM   #6
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
I agree with Pete. While the case has been polished, it looks and presents very nicely. I don't care for it when someone sends the watch back for service and they put a factory looking chamfer on a thin lug. What I like about it is it is not trying to be something its not. Patina on the dial and hands is gorgeous. For the most part, with the exception of the insert which may be newer, watch also appears to be period correct. All in all a very attractive piece that will make someone very happy.

It is interesting to note that if the watch is from 1973 like the bracelet indicates ( I realize that might not be the case at all ) then a Mk II dial might be more correct. I say this based on the Rolex Reference Library Gmt Dial Variants thread. However, my own 1675 is from the 72/73 era and has a Mk I dial as well.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 07:07 AM   #7
Mosco
"TRF" Member
 
Mosco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
What if it was complete?
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss

“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson
Mosco is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 07:29 AM   #8
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
that looks very nice. it does look like it's had a polish but still retains some lovely chamfers...
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 08:37 AM   #9
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
I too guess the date from early to mid 70s. My first GMT was the same
landroverking is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 10:06 AM   #10
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
Looks like a mk1
Michael M. is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 10:08 AM   #11
cruvon
"TRF" Member
 
cruvon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,688
whew, looks sweet, just make sure all the other originality boxes tick.:)
__________________

Last thing I remember, I was Running outta sight
I had to find the passage back,To the place I was before.
’Relax,’ said this Rolex place,We are programmed to receive.
You can checkout any time you like, But you can never leave!
cruvon is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 10:13 AM   #12
jedly1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,917
looks like a really nice honest example that's been well cared for.
jedly1 is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 10:26 AM   #13
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
Also, it has nice patina. Looks like a solid example!!
Michael M. is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 11:02 AM   #14
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,197
I agree with Beaumont. The case has been polished, but 99.9% of the vintage watches have polished cases. The dial and hands appear original. The bezel insert has been replaced at one time and appears to be an original insert though. Looks like a very fine piece!
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 03:28 PM   #15
vmm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Posts: 171
Thanks for all the feedback all! Appreciate the information.
__________________
Tag 2000, Tag F1 Quartz Chronograph, Omega Deville ,Omega Seamaster, Tag Carerra Automatic,
Raymond Weil Tango, Bathys Acquaculture Automatic
Doxa SUB 800 Ti Pro., Bathys Benthic Titanium, Doxa 1923 Jugendstil, Doxa SUB 1000T Divingstar, Rolex 116710,Suunto T6C, PAM 113, Rolex14060m, Rolex16750.
vmm is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 04:42 PM   #16
gensiulia
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 250
very nice, congrats.
gensiulia is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 05:01 PM   #17
Orchi
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by vmm View Post
Hi all,

I'm a newbie to the forum but have gotten the vintage bug and I wanted to get some opinions on this watch. It's a 3,xxx,xxx serial. Was curious about the lume, dial and hands and whether or not the case/band have been polished. Many thanks to all.
Err Buddies...
the trouble may arise with this kind of post seeking comments...
whereby IF Orchi gives a frank opinion about it...
fearing it might project a negative image of the watch...
which might offend the OP or the Seller...
who could be watching this forum also...

Last edited by Earl; 19 August 2011 at 08:50 PM.. Reason: Orchi, So why respond?.
Orchi is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 08:01 PM   #18
montecristo4
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 91
I don't like the way the case has been polished. Look at the lower left and upper right lug holes... It seems like they underwent a massive explosion or so :)
montecristo4 is offline  
Old 19 August 2011, 10:57 PM   #19
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
Man the patina is beautifully matching and the watch looks in great condition. Looks like a fine example 1675
Frogman4me is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 12:38 AM   #20
pdoukas
"TRF" Member
 
pdoukas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orchi View Post
Err Buddies...
the trouble may arise with this kind of post seeking comments...
whereby IF Orchi gives a frank opinion about it...
fearing it might project a negative image of the watch...
which might offend the OP or the Seller...
who could be watching this forum also...
Buddy Orchi,

People, such as myself, value the positive and negative opinions that forum members post so that they can add another level of due diligence to their arsenal of research.

Directly, your research and posts, along those with Mike's, provided me the passion that guided me to the purchase of my 16760 "no-date" fat lady. However, all decisions regarding the purchase and any subsequent actions, are entirely dependent on my actions. If I were to be unhappy with the purchase or watch after the fact, that is not a reflection upon you or forum members but of myself. If I were to blame others, if that were the case, then I would have had no business asking to begin with.

Forum members, such as yourself, who are hobbyists collectors and share a passion for their collection are not responsible for the actions of others. You are, however, valuable resources so that others may learn and share knowledge so that we can hopefully become as wise as those who are "more knowing".

Just my humble opinion.

Pete
pdoukas is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 01:45 AM   #21
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
Orchi, i love your comments and have learned a lot from you. i am confident that the mods on THIS forum would allow you to state what you think about a watch.

a seller posts a pics on here for all to see to get a sale, which is allowed. if a buyer is permitted to solicit comments in another thread, i cant see how you are doing anything wrong by contributing a comment. is a seller permitted to block a thread requesting comments on his piece? or phrased differently, should a buyer be required to obtain authorization for such a post from the Mods ?
harry in montreal is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 02:18 AM   #22
Mosco
"TRF" Member
 
Mosco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
Icon4

Orchi - man

I'll put the cards on the table and confirm what some have already presumed, I am the seller of this watch (it is on consignment from an old collector-friend of mine). The OP is the potential buyer, and we both want to learn. So I welcome your comments, we seek to learn from your wisdom
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss

“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson
Mosco is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 02:33 AM   #23
Orchi
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
Err Buddies...thanks for your understanding on the matter...

Back to the topic at hand...
Orchi sees the following...

1. Case had been over-repolished...
2. The lugs had been shaved...(shorter at 2 o'clock...n rest uneven)
3. Endlinks would not fit nicely due to item 2 above...
4. Mk.1 Dial though in pristine conditions...could possibly be a bit late for Case serial...
5. No pics of movement n inside CB...so can't offer any comments on it...

Perhaps Orchi has a weakness due to being picky...
but that's what Orchi is...

Sorry...
Orchi is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 02:33 AM   #24
greekbum
"TRF" Member
 
greekbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,415
Has buying and selling vintage come to this? Orchi's assessment is correct IMHO and this IMHO is a decent watch. I think it all comes down to price and what your willing to pay for. Is the OP looking for a like NOS version of a 1675 and willing to pay what 1 in this condition could go for? 5-10 maybe even 15k as I never see any for sale.I am a GMT guy and in 20 years and 100's of 1675 I have gotten a few mint no excuse ones. Greg how much are you asking for this 1675 ?
I am an active buyer of all 1675 and to help I will show you what I see recently
I cannot find even a donor 1675 watch for under $2200-$2500 this is a watch that has many issues and will be used for parts. Most likely over polished case water damage,redial, after market parts maybe running but maybe not
$3000-$3500 I still cannot find a decent case dial fixer upper that may require a minimum of $1000 to get decent
And so on..
Realistic expectations for realistic prices
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas

Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting
greekbum is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 02:48 AM   #25
adt
"TRF" Member
 
adt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: A
Location: SEA
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orchi View Post
Err Buddies...thanks for your understanding on the matter...

Back to the topic at hand...
Orchi sees the following...

1. Case had been over-repolished...
2. The lugs had been shaved...(shorter at 2 o'clock...n rest uneven)
3. Endlinks would not fit nicely due to item 2 above...
4. Mk.1 Dial though in pristine conditions...could possibly be a bit late for Case serial...
5. No pics of movement n inside CB...so can't offer any comments on it...

Perhaps Orchi has a weakness due to being picky...
but that's what Orchi is...

Sorry...
good stuff! it was good to have coffee with you last week and learn something


andrew
adt is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 02:48 AM   #26
vmm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Posts: 171
I'm awestruck by the knowledge on here. I'm quite the neophyte and Greg has been an absolute gentleman through this process. I had purchased a few Montblancs from Greg and had mentioned that I was curious about vintage pieces especially the GMT and as it happens this piece came up for consignment. Honestly I know very little except for what the excellent and knowledgeable posters here have mentioned on this and other threads. I'm learning a bunch as it is. Thanks to all for posting and especially to Greg for quite amicably agreeing to let me post these pics in order to learn. This is quite a place.
__________________
Tag 2000, Tag F1 Quartz Chronograph, Omega Deville ,Omega Seamaster, Tag Carerra Automatic,
Raymond Weil Tango, Bathys Acquaculture Automatic
Doxa SUB 800 Ti Pro., Bathys Benthic Titanium, Doxa 1923 Jugendstil, Doxa SUB 1000T Divingstar, Rolex 116710,Suunto T6C, PAM 113, Rolex14060m, Rolex16750.
vmm is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 03:02 AM   #27
Mosco
"TRF" Member
 
Mosco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orchi View Post
Err Buddies...thanks for your understanding on the matter...

Back to the topic at hand...
Orchi sees the following...

1. Case had been over-repolished...
2. The lugs had been shaved...(shorter at 2 o'clock...n rest uneven)
3. Endlinks would not fit nicely due to item 2 above...
4. Mk.1 Dial though in pristine conditions...could possibly be a bit late for Case serial...
5. No pics of movement n inside CB...so can't offer any comments on it...

Perhaps Orchi has a weakness due to being picky...
but that's what Orchi is...

Sorry...
Sorry for what? Talking in 3rd person

Everything else is appreciated, man

Please clarify the 'n inside CB'. As far as movement - I am a firm believer in that the less times a vintage piece is opened, the better. Plus I carefully consider my sources, so have no reason to doubt. Besides, most of the time a recipient of a vintage watch will open it himself anyway, and in an unlikely case something is 'weird', they have full recourse with me and will be made whole immediately.
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss

“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson
Mosco is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 03:02 AM   #28
Orchi
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by greekbum View Post
Has buying and selling vintage come to this? Orchi's assessment is correct IMHO and this IMHO is a decent watch. I think it all comes down to price and what your willing to pay for. Is the OP looking for a like NOS version of a 1675 and willing to pay what 1 in this condition could go for? 5-10 maybe even 15k as I never see any for sale.I am GMT guy and in 20 years and 100's of 1675 I have gotten a few mint no excuse ones. Greg how much are you asking for this 1675 ?
I am an active buyer of all 1675 and to help I will show you what I see recently
I cannot find even a donor 1675 watch for under $2200-$2500 this is a watch that has many issues and will be used for parts. Most likely over polished case water damage,redial, after market parts maybe running but maybe not
$3000-$3500 I still cannot find a decent case dial fixer upper that may require a minimum of $1000 to get decent
And so on..
Realistic expectations for realistic prices
Err Buddy Nikos...on a dealer's standpoint...
Orchi would agree with you wholeheartedly...
n this is what Orchi sees...in retail.

1. Original Case+CB could fetch up to $800
2. Dial being in pristine conditions may be >$1000
3. Hands with nice Patina n flawless lumes conditions may be another $500~$600
4. Bezel assembly being nice n all $400
5. US Riveted band being in fair state of conditions $500~$600
6. Cal.1575 GMT movement may be >$1300

So...if it was Orchi having to deal with this watch...
it would be considered to be sold for parts...
Orchi is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 03:08 AM   #29
Orchi
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosco View Post
Sorry for what? Talking in 3rd person

Everything else is appreciated, man

Please clarify the 'n inside CB'. As far as movement - I am a firm believer in that the less times a vintage piece is opened, the better. Plus I carefully consider my sources, so have no reason to doubt. Besides, most of the time a recipient of a vintage watch will open it himself anyway, and in an unlikely case something is 'weird', they have full recourse with me and will be made whole immediately.
Err Buddy Greg...when Orchi reads you could be the Seller...
n knowing you all this while for being a great Gentleman n Seller...
Orchi went ahead to post own opinions...
in spite of seeing later on the notification from Buddy Earl...

As Buddy Nikos has clearly commented...
this 1675 GMT could yield better potential as parts...
strictly on business sense...

Cheers to you...

P/S:

Orchi usually would open CB to take pictures inside a case...
in closed...clean...n air conditioned environment...
when relative humidity n elements would not be bad enough...
to cause any ill effects...inside.
Orchi is offline  
Old 20 August 2011, 03:10 AM   #30
greekbum
"TRF" Member
 
greekbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orchi View Post
So...if it was Orchi having to deal with this watch...
it would be considered to be sold for parts...
Orchi when I am looking to buy a watch personally and its not to my expectations as I am very picky myself I figure out what its worth in parts to put a number on it. I Usually figure a range and come to a number I am comfortable with. good to see you back
The 1675 mentioned by the OP is a decent watch and I would never part something like that out but would use my math and yours for a realistic price. This BTW is how I buy every watch unless its so mint I must have it and then I pay whatever....
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas

Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting
greekbum is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.