ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 September 2020, 02:05 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 17
|
Opinions on which 14270/114270 Explorer to get.
Hi TRF,
Been a long time lurker since I looked at getting a sub a few years back. I ended up buying a Blancpain FF Bathyscaphe in the end but still have the itch for a Rolex for everyday general wear ever since. So when the new OPs were announced I made a trip to the AD and tried a green OP36 on, instantly loved it and ordered one. Still this just renewed my interest and I felt that I wanted an Explorer as well but the question is which? Size wise it has to be 36 as that seems to be the sweet spot for me on bezelless watches (would have posted pics of the OP but couldnt due to being under 10 posts.) So this rules out the 214270 and price also rules out the 1016 and older. This leaves the 14270 and 114270. That probably works better as an everyday watch anyway given the more modern movement. I understand there are basically these differences (excluding blackout, inverted 9s etc which is outside my budget): 14270 c. tritium (w lug holes) 14270 luminova (w and w/o lug holes, pre 94/95?) 14270 super luminova 114270 "normal" 114270 c. 2007+ Rehaut engraving Have I missed factors/vatiants? General looks seems to be they start from about 5k usd and then about 1k premium with rehaut markings. For me cal 3000 and 3130 doesn't seem to be a big update and so I am generally indifferent to either. I also don't care for the rehaut so wouldn't really mind. So, I am coming to the conclusion that I want a 14270 with luminova and drilled lugs as I do want lume for an everyday watch and drilled lugs would be more truthful to the original, plus easier to swap on a nato too. But I did want to just ask for some opinions and if I have missed anything in my thinking? Thanks Gary Sent from my SM-A202F using Tapatalk |
21 September 2020, 02:15 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,265
|
The only opinion that matters is yours and yours only, just buy the one you want to own and wear its that simple.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
21 September 2020, 10:29 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 17
|
Well I agree but was just getting at whether I missed any variants or factors to consider although I did think my research was fairly exhaustive.
Sent from my SM-A202F using Tapatalk |
21 September 2020, 11:03 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,603
|
Would pick a 14270 with lug holes over the 114270
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 Zenith 02.470.405 Henry Archer Eclipse 2FA security enabled |
21 September 2020, 11:10 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: SpeedyProExplorer1
Posts: 418
|
If it's going to be an everyday watch, I would go for something with Luminova for the functional lume aspect.
FWIW, I have a 14270, No Lug Holes, Luminova. Great Watch. |
21 September 2020, 11:33 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: shopping
Posts: 1,466
|
I'd go for the best condition 3130 mvmt without rehaut engraving.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
21 September 2020, 11:38 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Hillside
Posts: 312
|
If you haven’t got the chance to try the 39mm explorer, give it a try. The 36mm explorer price is pretty near the 39mm.
|
21 September 2020, 11:46 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 17
|
Thanks for the replies, yeah I think lug hole 14270 with lume seems to be the
Quote:
Sent from my SM-A202F using Tapatalk |
|
21 September 2020, 11:48 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-A202F using Tapatalk |
|
22 September 2020, 12:43 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Hillside
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
The 39mm version bracelet is really solid |
|
22 September 2020, 12:57 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: shopping
Posts: 1,466
|
Exactly. Rolex is a company where you can guarantee that each new iteration of movements will be better than the one before. I question some of their recent design decisions, but I'll never question their constant improvements.
As to the rehaut: always thought the ROLEXROLEXROLEX rehauts are a little cheesy. Didn't prevent me from buying a new OP with it, though
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
22 September 2020, 04:27 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Bursa
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 493
|
Condition aside i would go for the one with rehaut, old school case with modern iterations
|
22 September 2020, 04:49 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Alex
Location: New York
Watch: 1603
Posts: 243
|
I don't believe this configuration exists. Lug holes on the 14270 were long phased out before the introduction of Luminova. Unless of course you find an example with a later service dial, which however is less desirable in my book. I wouldn't sweat the luminescence and find the best condition drilled-lug and tritium watch you can afford.
|
22 September 2020, 05:15 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Rossi: The solid end links they introduced with the 114270 was something I missed which I think is a real plus for me. I think I might be now down to 14270 with luminova and lug holes and the 114270 pre rehaut now. Will probably just have to monitor the market for a bit now and see if something in good condition and the right price comes up! Sent from my SM-A202F using Tapatalk |
|
22 September 2020, 05:20 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-A202F using Tapatalk |
|
22 September 2020, 05:58 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 383
|
I think you’ve covered all of the variants. Most of the fun is in the research you’ve even got the blackout variants etc.
Personally I went for the 114270 due to the solid end links. Although I like the look of patina’d tritium on some watches - the Explorer wasn’t one of them so I was happier going for a newer model. Once id decided on the 114270 it was a case of engraved Rehaut vs not. I thought a) the non-engraved looked cleaner and b) the premium on them just because they are more rare was a little too high for my liking. Good luck searching - they’re becoming harder to find in the UK. I ended up purchasing from Chrono24. Love the watch. |
22 September 2020, 06:07 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 17
|
Yes, they are definitely rarer in the UK versus asia. Incidentally I have family coming over from Hong Kong in Jan, so my plan is to look also at HK and Japan for the next few months and have it brought over with them.
Talking about research, the explorer was apparently popularised by a Japanese singer/TV star back then which caused quite a lot of these to go to Japan and the far east. I actually liked some of the work from this guy but never knew this connection until recently which I thought was interesting. Sent from my SM-A202F using Tapatalk |
22 September 2020, 06:09 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Alex
Location: New York
Watch: 1603
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
|
|
22 September 2020, 06:20 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 17
|
I see, I probably need to do a little bit more research on this but this would definitely explain why I was seeing 96 97 watches with T dials. So that is probably right and that website got this wrong.
This could be a decider for me though. If lug holes are only on the T dial as originals then I would probably pick the solid links and super luminova on the 114270. Sent from my SM-A202F using Tapatalk |
25 September 2020, 10:09 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: James
Location: Houston
Watch: 114200
Posts: 4
|
I'm fairly certain these don't exist? The luminova "Swiss Only" Dials were a short run in 98/99 before switching over to Superluminova "Swiss Made" in 99/2000 right before the 114270 was introduced. Am I missing something?
|
25 September 2020, 10:43 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jack
Location: NYC
Watch: 16570, 16710
Posts: 1,534
|
those dont exist, unless service dials come into play. Lug holes as a feature on the 14270 went pretty early. There is a stretch where its tritium dial no holes case, which went into the U serial region, then the lume change over started. There is some overlap on T<25 dials but with luminova that will not patina.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.