ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SubMarine · 25 May 2018, 06:33 AM

There is something about the old style bracelets and aesthetics of the thinner lugs that provides serious eye candy as well as wrist comfort.

Beelzy · 25 May 2018, 06:46 AM

Probably because they were designed to be worn every day as a tool watch and
not as wrist jewelry with a dial. IMO

MinMay · 25 May 2018, 06:51 AM

A lot of folks find 6 digits more comfortable :)

I can't wait for the 7 digits with the red lettering on a maxi case :)

stratguy · 25 May 2018, 06:56 AM

I have both, and have to admit that while I was enamored with the Sub-C for about 18 months, I have totally reverted to my 16610. I don't wear my 114060 anymore.

P.S. It looks great on you.

Maiden · 25 May 2018, 07:01 AM

I actually find the 6 digit more comfortable, especially with the glidelock adjustability. Anyhow different strokes for different folks...

Phrank · 25 May 2018, 07:06 AM

I'm with ya brother...preach!!

droptopman · 25 May 2018, 07:09 AM

Die hard 4 and 5 digit guy, but I must say the 6 digits do wear more comfortable for me. I have a weird shape wrist and for some reason the bigger case sits in the sweet spot better. Still keep some vintage around and enjoy wearing them.

Brian Page · 25 May 2018, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stratguy

I have both, and have to admit that while I was enamored with the Sub-C for about 18 months, I have totally reverted to my 16610. I don't wear my 114060 anymore.

P.S. It looks great on you.

I'm currently in exactly this mode as well...

TudorTuesday · 25 May 2018, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubMarine

There is something about the old style bracelets and aesthetics of the thinner lugs that provides serious eye candy as well as wrist comfort.

I agree - the old thinner oyster bracelet basically disappears in use, and the proportions are so classic...

Enjoy!

SubMarine · 25 May 2018, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stratguy

I have both, and have to admit that while I was enamored with the Sub-C for about 18 months, I have totally reverted to my 16610. I don't wear my 114060 anymore.

P.S. It looks great on you.

Thank you for the compliment! Yes, I agree!!

SubMarine · 25 May 2018, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stratguy

I have both, and have to admit that while I was enamored with the Sub-C for about 18 months, I have totally reverted to my 16610. I don't wear my 114060 anymore.

P.S. It looks great on you.

Sounds like it's time to flip!

Finslayer83 · 25 May 2018, 07:29 AM

I was on the same train until I got to try on a buddies Hulk with the glidelock.

I'm not paying $6k+ for a watch with a band that is lessor quality than the Squale I have. I'd be a 14060/M buyer all day at $3k but at current prices the 6 digit is an easy choice.

Justinmg · 25 May 2018, 07:32 AM

Yep I’d take a 5 digit over any 6 digit and I’ve owned a sub c and a SD c.

Beckster · 25 May 2018, 07:50 AM

Yes I understand what you mean. Which is why I added the 14060 and the 16710 even after I bought the 116710BLNR and LN as well. They’re just so comfortable and classic looking. Timeless!

Cru Jones · 25 May 2018, 07:50 AM

That's a good question. I really don't know why or think the same. But, you happy, I happy.

Onikage · 25 May 2018, 08:03 AM

Sounds like you're not a fan of the relatively recent maxi treatment - Me neither, and never afraid to say it. Pre-maxi were just better looking to me. I still wonder why they did it? They could have just made bigger versions and added ceramic and solid clasps. Why didn't they? Why?!

landroverking · 26 May 2018, 04:00 AM

Four and fives way more comfortable imo.

ferrissteve11 · 26 May 2018, 04:04 AM

Having had the older style case/bracelet combo....I'm definitely in the new 6 digit camp. The upgrades across the board are worth it IMO. Granted its a little more 'jewelry' ish, but that doesn't stop me from wearing it as a daily.

tyler1980 · 26 May 2018, 04:56 AM

you would think all this old style love would free up some waitlist room for those who prefer the new style... sadly not the case

Loevhagen · 26 May 2018, 05:04 AM

Because everything is relative - and the 6-digits ain't?

kneedeep · 26 May 2018, 05:06 AM

I agree on the aesthetics but can't comment yet on 6 digit comfort v 5 digit. But will be able to soon.

toolr · 26 May 2018, 05:09 AM

I've had several 5 digit Rolex including three Subdates, a GMT-ll, and a Exp-ll, and all are gone in favor of the Sub C. It is the most comfortable watch I've worn. So, depends on your preference.

Boaters · 26 May 2018, 05:33 AM

I love my 6 digit subs but my 16710 fits unbelievably good I did mod it with a glidelock but an awesome fit.

chad362wiley · 26 May 2018, 05:45 AM

the weight is much more manageable than 6 digits. comfort is awesome, but there is a noticeable difference in build quality vs the 6ers. but on the wrist that doesnt matter as much

LINVS · 26 May 2018, 05:47 AM

I think the proportions are better - they were designed before the big watch trend started.

How stout does a watch need to be?

SubMarine · 26 May 2018, 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chad362wiley

the weight is much more manageable than 6 digits. comfort is awesome, but there is a noticeable difference in build quality vs the 6ers. but on the wrist that doesnt matter as much

Glidelock bracelets can be had for less than $2k...

mjclark32 · 26 May 2018, 05:51 AM

Agreed, love my 16610

FTX I · 26 May 2018, 06:22 AM

Love it.

chloebear · 26 May 2018, 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by landroverking

Four and fives way more comfortable imo.

What's the difference (in general) between the 4 and 5 digit references? Was the five digit the jump to applied indices?

josephvman · 26 May 2018, 06:56 AM

Perfect proportions. The current Sub and GMT’s cases are horrible IMO. I had a BLNR and just could not love it because of the blocky case. I’m wearing a Z-blue Milgauss today and it has great proportions similar to. 5-digit piece.

25 May 2018, 07:01 AM	#5
Maiden "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 3,650	I actually find the 6 digit more comfortable, especially with the glidelock adjustability. Anyhow different strokes for different folks... __________________ Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2

25 May 2018, 07:09 AM	#7
droptopman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Real Name: Mark Location: Washington State Watch: SUBS and GMT's! Posts: 9,664	Die hard 4 and 5 digit guy, but I must say the 6 digits do wear more comfortable for me. I have a weird shape wrist and for some reason the bigger case sits in the sweet spot better. Still keep some vintage around and enjoy wearing them. __________________ Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today? Ty: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score. Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers? Ty: By height.

25 May 2018, 07:32 AM	#13
Justinmg "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Justin Location: FL Watch: PO Posts: 3,353	Yep I’d take a 5 digit over any 6 digit and I’ve owned a sub c and a SD c. __________________ //////////////////////////////// Member of The Nylon Nation Does it do anything? It tells the time.

25 May 2018, 07:50 AM	#14
Beckster "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Singapore Watch: 16710 BLRO Posts: 836	Yes I understand what you mean. Which is why I added the 14060 and the 16710 even after I bought the 116710BLNR and LN as well. They’re just so comfortable and classic looking. Timeless! __________________ Rolex Only Please

25 May 2018, 08:03 AM	#16
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,758	Sounds like you're not a fan of the relatively recent maxi treatment - Me neither, and never afraid to say it. Pre-maxi were just better looking to me. I still wonder why they did it? They could have just made bigger versions and added ceramic and solid clasps. Why didn't they? Why?! __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

25 May 2018, 06:46 AM	#2
Beelzy "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Chris Location: Cen-Cal Watch: 16610 Posts: 869	Probably because they were designed to be worn every day as a tool watch and not as wrist jewelry with a dial. IMO

25 May 2018, 06:51 AM	#3
MinMay Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: United States Posts: 2,410	A lot of folks find 6 digits more comfortable :) I can't wait for the 7 digits with the red lettering on a maxi case :)

25 May 2018, 06:56 AM	#4
stratguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: USA Watch: Speedmaster Pro Posts: 670	I have both, and have to admit that while I was enamored with the Sub-C for about 18 months, I have totally reverted to my 16610. I don't wear my 114060 anymore. P.S. It looks great on you.

25 May 2018, 07:06 AM	#6
Phrank 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Location: Toronto Watch: ♕ Posts: 1,997	I'm with ya brother...preach!!

25 May 2018, 07:29 AM	#12
Finslayer83 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: Tennessee Watch: DW-5600 Posts: 1,584	I was on the same train until I got to try on a buddies Hulk with the glidelock. I'm not paying $6k+ for a watch with a band that is lessor quality than the Squale I have. I'd be a 14060/M buyer all day at $3k but at current prices the 6 digit is an easy choice.

25 May 2018, 07:50 AM	#15
Cru Jones 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 34,473	That's a good question. I really don't know why or think the same. But, you happy, I happy.

26 May 2018, 04:00 AM	#17
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	Four and fives way more comfortable imo.

26 May 2018, 04:04 AM	#18
ferrissteve11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: USA Posts: 1,115	Having had the older style case/bracelet combo....I'm definitely in the new 6 digit camp. The upgrades across the board are worth it IMO. Granted its a little more 'jewelry' ish, but that doesn't stop me from wearing it as a daily.

26 May 2018, 04:56 AM	#19
tyler1980 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Houston Posts: 17,622	you would think all this old style love would free up some waitlist room for those who prefer the new style... sadly not the case __________________ Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)

26 May 2018, 05:04 AM	#20
Loevhagen "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: The aperture Posts: 4,906	Because everything is relative - and the 6-digits ain't?

26 May 2018, 05:06 AM	#21
kneedeep "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Not 2 far from u Posts: 3,457	I agree on the aesthetics but can't comment yet on 6 digit comfort v 5 digit. But will be able to soon. __________________ Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018

26 May 2018, 05:09 AM	#22
toolr 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Northwest Posts: 1,337	I've had several 5 digit Rolex including three Subdates, a GMT-ll, and a Exp-ll, and all are gone in favor of the Sub C. It is the most comfortable watch I've worn. So, depends on your preference.

26 May 2018, 05:33 AM	#23
Boaters 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD Posts: 10,649	I love my 6 digit subs but my 16710 fits unbelievably good I did mod it with a glidelock but an awesome fit.

26 May 2018, 05:45 AM	#24
chad362wiley "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: N/A Posts: 1,218	the weight is much more manageable than 6 digits. comfort is awesome, but there is a noticeable difference in build quality vs the 6ers. but on the wrist that doesnt matter as much __________________ 116506

26 May 2018, 05:47 AM	#25
LINVS Banned Join Date: Apr 2018 Location: SoCal Posts: 149	I think the proportions are better - they were designed before the big watch trend started. How stout does a watch need to be?

26 May 2018, 05:51 AM	#27
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	Agreed, love my 16610 __________________

26 May 2018, 06:22 AM	#28
FTX I "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Flavio Location: N/A Posts: 14,652	Love it.

26 May 2018, 06:56 AM	#30
josephvman Banned Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Houston, TX USA Posts: 808	Perfect proportions. The current Sub and GMT’s cases are horrible IMO. I had a BLNR and just could not love it because of the blocky case. I’m wearing a Z-blue Milgauss today and it has great proportions similar to. 5-digit piece.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)