ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

texex91 · 16 June 2012, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Submarino

While the 15400 looked good on my wrist, I am a purist when it comes to Royal Oaks. 39mm Royal Oak is always my choice. Plus something I didn't like about the 41mm is that the flange around the dial seems to be taller because is flat instead of curved, hence making the dial sit lower than on the 39mm. It might just be an optical illusion, not a 100% sure though. Still a very nice piece!

I hear you.

Then time for a new 15202

Submarino · 16 June 2012, 01:33 AM

Definitely the 15202 is an amazing piece. Can't wait for my 5402 to come back from service in mid-August.

kilyung · 16 June 2012, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texex91

I hear you.

Then time for a new 15202

texex91 · 16 June 2012, 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

AH HA!!

Mike, Mike, Mike...I knew that wasn't going to take long.

Today or tomorrow should we expect the unveil

Submarino · 16 June 2012, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Can't wait!!! I knew you were going to get one.

TSW · 16 June 2012, 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

Now I'm seriously contemplating trading a Daytona for the ROC!

As much as i do love my Daytona..it hardly never get's any wrist time.

dimitros · 9 July 2012, 04:06 AM

Sorry to bump an old thread. Could one of you folks, kindly tell me the lug to lug, or more accurately, integrated link to link measurement on the 15300? And what is the measurement of the flat surface encompassed by the angled link from end to end?

My 14060 sub measures 47.5 mm from lug to lug and it has a more or less flat caseback and barely fits on my 5.75" wrist without overhanging the top of my wrist without looking goofy. The 44mm luminor measures 52 mm lug to lug, and barely overhangs the top of the wrist but this is disguised with a fat chunky strap. Granted the 15300 integrated lug/link is angled slightly down slopes, right? So I might be able to pull this off?

Nearest AD is in another state, and really hard for me to try one on.

Thanks guys...

These are getting harder to come buy, wish I had pulled the trigger on one of the minty white dials a few months back.

wisguy · 9 July 2012, 02:47 PM

Here are a couple of old pics, before I sold all my watches (prior watches), I have a couple of new ones as you can see in my signature:

You can see the size, it wears larger than 39mm would suggest.

dimitros · 9 July 2012, 09:35 PM

How Does it wear bigger compared to the gmtii c? Thanks

Darlinboy · 10 July 2012, 02:51 AM

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1341852488.027947.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1341852631.165882.jpg

dimitros · 10 July 2012, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlinboy

Attachment 295179
Attachment 295180

Exactly what I was looking for... .It might work...
Thank you, Sir! Very helpful!!!! You made my day

Darlinboy · 10 July 2012, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dimitros

Exactly what I was looking for... .It might work...
Thank you, Sir! Very helpful!!!! You made my day

Glad to help!

I think it's a terrific watch, hope it works for you.

16 June 2012, 01:33 AM	#32
Submarino "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Mr. H Location: Dallas Watch: them for me! Posts: 7,180	Definitely the 15202 is an amazing piece. Can't wait for my 5402 to come back from service in mid-August. __________________ WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

9 July 2012, 02:47 PM	#38
wisguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Earth Posts: 2,406	Here are a couple of old pics, before I sold all my watches (prior watches), I have a couple of new ones as you can see in my signature: You can see the size, it wears larger than 39mm would suggest. __________________ 5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation

10 July 2012, 02:51 AM	#40
Darlinboy 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: DB Location: :noitacoL Watch: :hctaW Posts: 6,699	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1341852488.027947.jpg ImageUploadedByTapatalk1341852631.165882.jpg __________________ Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

9 July 2012, 04:06 AM	#37
dimitros "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: nope Location: S of Mason-Dixon Watch: NDSub/PAM176/R1931 Posts: 262	Sorry to bump an old thread. Could one of you folks, kindly tell me the lug to lug, or more accurately, integrated link to link measurement on the 15300? And what is the measurement of the flat surface encompassed by the angled link from end to end? My 14060 sub measures 47.5 mm from lug to lug and it has a more or less flat caseback and barely fits on my 5.75" wrist without overhanging the top of my wrist without looking goofy. The 44mm luminor measures 52 mm lug to lug, and barely overhangs the top of the wrist but this is disguised with a fat chunky strap. Granted the 15300 integrated lug/link is angled slightly down slopes, right? So I might be able to pull this off? Nearest AD is in another state, and really hard for me to try one on. Thanks guys... These are getting harder to come buy, wish I had pulled the trigger on one of the minty white dials a few months back.

9 July 2012, 09:35 PM	#39
dimitros "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: nope Location: S of Mason-Dixon Watch: NDSub/PAM176/R1931 Posts: 262	How Does it wear bigger compared to the gmtii c? Thanks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)