ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Karbo · 12 January 2014, 07:40 PM

Hello TRF

I have both
Got to admit that 14060M is fantastic as a daily wearer
Simple dial
Comfortable
Matte bezel
True sub descendant !

SD 16600 is an absolute beauty too
She got date without cyclope wich is a plus
But thickier heavier

Guyz which one and why ? Which one for a daily wearer ?
Post pics of the 2 together if possible

zama · 12 January 2014, 08:04 PM

Alternate them if you have both.

padi56 · 12 January 2014, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zama

Alternate them if you have both.

Have to agree and anyone with simple common sense would do the same.

Karbo · 12 January 2014, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

Have to agree and anyone with simple common sense would do the same.

Lol

So i ask differently, which one wd you sell ?

lunarossa! · 12 January 2014, 09:51 PM

Sd 16600 is the best

SearChart · 12 January 2014, 10:18 PM

I would go for the 14060M, no loupe and it has a clean dial.

Len · 12 January 2014, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SearChart

I would go for the 14060M, no loupe and it has a clean dial.

Correct. Because it has no date. But the sd does not have an loupe as well...

I prefere the sd but they look almost the same.

padi56 · 12 January 2014, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karbo

Lol

So i ask differently, which one wd you sell ?

Well seeing I have quoted several times on forum my favorite sports watch is the 16600 SD so I will leave you to guess which one I would sell.

Ector495 · 12 January 2014, 11:17 PM

The date on the SD is more appealing. I usually find that a watch with a date is more useful.

samone · 12 January 2014, 11:40 PM

14060m

Cc1966 · 13 January 2014, 12:33 AM

Sell the two-liner...

bigrustypig · 13 January 2014, 12:41 AM

To me the SD is unbeatable. Looks, size, COSC, rating. If I were to sell one of the 2, of course, goodbye 2 liner.

kilyung · 13 January 2014, 12:44 AM

I'd sell the SD as it sounds like you already like the 14060M as a daily.

red1108nyc · 13 January 2014, 12:55 AM

I find the thickness and presence of the SD more fitting for my eyes and wrist!

uansari1 · 13 January 2014, 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cc1966

Sell the two-liner...

Yes...sell it (to me)!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Karbo · 13 January 2014, 04:21 AM

70/30 for SD ! Never thought that !

CDNWatchNut · 13 January 2014, 04:28 AM

The SD is cool, but for daily wearing comfort...sub.

anothernewphone · 13 January 2014, 04:29 AM

I used to have a Sea-Dweller, and I don't miss it a bit.

I moved on to the Submariner, but the newer reference.

Passionata · 13 January 2014, 05:05 AM

ND sub

Survivor · 13 January 2014, 05:12 AM

Whenever there's a choice between a Sub and an SD, the correct answer is always SD.....think Red Sub vs Double Red SD, you would obviously choose Double Red. For those of you who must have a date, an SD has the option of a date, subtly placed in the dial so as not to interfere with the symmetry of the dial unlike the Sub with that horrible looking cyclops (no one ever puts the words handsome, good looking, stylish with the word "cyclops") so again, the obvious choice, SD. Just knowing you have a more substantial, better in every way watch, leads you to the only possible conclusion.........SD!!!!!

Oh yeah......one more thing........."Go big or go home"

Rolex40mm · 13 January 2014, 05:17 AM

I owned the SD, and it didn't do much for me. I sold it and got the explorer II. The 14060M is on my list for the next one, just waiting for the right deal to pop up.

CDNWatchNut · 13 January 2014, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Survivor

Whenever there's a choice between a Sub and an SD, the correct answer is always SD.....think Red Sub vs Double Red SD, you would obviously choose Double Red. For those of you who must have a date, an SD has the option of a date, subtly placed in the dial so as not to interfere with the symmetry of the dial unlike the Sub with that horrible looking cyclops (no one ever puts the words handsome, good looking, stylish with the word "cyclops") so again, the obvious choice, SD. Just knowing you have a more substantial, better in every way watch, leads you to the only possible conclusion.........SD!!!!!

So, 1/3+ of voters so far are wrong?

petenyc · 13 January 2014, 05:18 AM

Sd

Rolex40mm · 13 January 2014, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anothernewphone

I used to have a Sea-Dweller, and I don't miss it a bit.

I moved on to the Submariner, but the newer reference.

I second that. your sub is looking great, and no watch compares IMHO

Karbo · 13 January 2014, 05:31 AM

I think comfort is the key between both
Can you wear 16600 24/24 ?

Survivor · 13 January 2014, 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDNWatchNut

So, 1/3+ of voters so far are wrong?

Exactly!!! There's another name for people, when trying to compete on any basis, that get only 33% of the vote......you know what that's called????? Loser!!!!!

Double-V · 13 January 2014, 05:45 AM

SD all the way.

My daily wear 24/7 with no complaints. Fits under the cuff, versatile, rare, and classic.

Alternate daily wear would be Explorer I

anothernewphone · 13 January 2014, 05:45 AM

The 16600 was the most uncomfortable watch I've ever worn.

Survivor · 13 January 2014, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anothernewphone

The 16600 was the most uncomfortable watch I've ever worn.

What do you mean was?????

beshannon · 13 January 2014, 05:51 AM

14060M two line Sub all day long, no question.

View Poll Results: 14060M 2 lines Or 16600 ?
14060M 2 lines Sub	48	38.71%
16600 SD	76	61.29%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

12 January 2014, 07:40 PM	#1
Karbo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Paris, France Watch: Dayto/5164 Posts: 1,631	14060M 2 lines Or SD 16600 ? Hello TRF I have both Got to admit that 14060M is fantastic as a daily wearer Simple dial Comfortable Matte bezel True sub descendant ! SD 16600 is an absolute beauty too She got date without cyclope wich is a plus But thickier heavier Guyz which one and why ? Which one for a daily wearer ? Post pics of the 2 together if possible __________________ IG : @aka_karbo

12 January 2014, 08:04 PM	#2
zama "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Craig Location: Sydney Watch: 4 Broken glass Posts: 5,806	Alternate them if you have both. __________________ Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze

12 January 2014, 11:17 PM	#9
Ector495 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: North Carolina Watch: 16622 Posts: 1,097	The date on the SD is more appealing. I usually find that a watch with a date is more useful. __________________ Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear. - Ambrose Redmoon

13 January 2014, 12:33 AM	#11
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	Sell the two-liner... __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

12 January 2014, 09:51 PM	#5
lunarossa! "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Andrea Location: italia Watch: Rolex 16610 Posts: 6	Sd 16600 is the best

12 January 2014, 11:40 PM	#10
samone Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Greece Posts: 21	14060m

13 January 2014, 12:41 AM	#12
bigrustypig "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Jeff Location: New Zealand Watch: Rolex DSSD Posts: 1,426	To me the SD is unbeatable. Looks, size, COSC, rating. If I were to sell one of the 2, of course, goodbye 2 liner.

13 January 2014, 12:44 AM	#13
kilyung 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,873	I'd sell the SD as it sounds like you already like the 14060M as a daily.

13 January 2014, 12:55 AM	#14
red1108nyc 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Real Name: Fred Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area Watch: Rolex Posts: 8,506	I find the thickness and presence of the SD more fitting for my eyes and wrist!

13 January 2014, 04:21 AM	#16
Karbo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Paris, France Watch: Dayto/5164 Posts: 1,631	70/30 for SD ! Never thought that ! __________________ IG : @aka_karbo

13 January 2014, 04:28 AM	#17
CDNWatchNut "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Juan Location: Sherwood Park, Ab Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,509	The SD is cool, but for daily wearing comfort...sub.

13 January 2014, 04:29 AM	#18
anothernewphone Banned Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Bill Location: Plymouth Meeting Watch: 116520 Posts: 3,209	I used to have a Sea-Dweller, and I don't miss it a bit. I moved on to the Submariner, but the newer reference.

13 January 2014, 05:05 AM	#19
Passionata "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: N/A Watch: the girls Posts: 7,095	ND sub __________________ Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- newhttps://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE new http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1

13 January 2014, 05:12 AM	#20
Survivor Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Rob Location: Thousand Oaks Watch: DSSD Posts: 1,017	Whenever there's a choice between a Sub and an SD, the correct answer is always SD.....think Red Sub vs Double Red SD, you would obviously choose Double Red. For those of you who must have a date, an SD has the option of a date, subtly placed in the dial so as not to interfere with the symmetry of the dial unlike the Sub with that horrible looking cyclops (no one ever puts the words handsome, good looking, stylish with the word "cyclops") so again, the obvious choice, SD. Just knowing you have a more substantial, better in every way watch, leads you to the only possible conclusion.........SD!!!!! Oh yeah......one more thing........."Go big or go home"

13 January 2014, 05:17 AM	#21
Rolex40mm Banned Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 373	I owned the SD, and it didn't do much for me. I sold it and got the explorer II. The 14060M is on my list for the next one, just waiting for the right deal to pop up.

13 January 2014, 05:18 AM	#23
petenyc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: pete Location: NYC Watch: 116610LN Posts: 1,011	Sd

13 January 2014, 05:31 AM	#25
Karbo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Paris, France Watch: Dayto/5164 Posts: 1,631	I think comfort is the key between both Can you wear 16600 24/24 ? __________________ IG : @aka_karbo

13 January 2014, 05:45 AM	#27
Double-V "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Vince Location: Chicago Watch: 16600 Posts: 12	SD all the way. My daily wear 24/7 with no complaints. Fits under the cuff, versatile, rare, and classic. Alternate daily wear would be Explorer I

13 January 2014, 05:51 AM	#30
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	14060M two line Sub all day long, no question. __________________ Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)