ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 December 2018, 11:09 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,188
|
GMT IIc vs SubC for comfort
If the GMTc was too big for you, I think you’d be making a big mistake by getting a SubC, which wears bigger. The fact that you are even asking this question should tell you that you shouldn’t buy it. If you are looking for a sub, then go 5 digit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
16 December 2018, 11:24 AM | #32 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: USA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
For me my 126711 feels a tad bit more comfortable than a Sub C. I have a 6.75 wrist. |
|
16 December 2018, 11:44 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 463
|
Mine all feel the same. If there’s a difference, it’s not much
__________________
116710BLNR, 116610LV, 114060, 116710LN |
16 December 2018, 11:48 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
|
I have found that watch comfort is highly subjective. The opinion of other people is almost useless. I need to try the watch on to tell if it feels good.
|
16 December 2018, 11:58 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Northern Rockies
Posts: 260
|
I think for now I’ve decided on a modified version of my Plan A. Get a BB58, but keep the Explo II also. The BB58 is affordable enough that I can...
|
16 December 2018, 12:25 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: SD43
Posts: 894
|
I have both and I can't tell the difference in weight or wearability. They feel the same to me.
|
16 December 2018, 09:59 PM | #37 |
TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,363
|
The GMT is more comfortable on my wrist. YMMV
__________________
JJ |
16 December 2018, 10:05 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 672
|
I own both.
I’ve had my SubC since January 2017, the most comfortable watch I own. I acquired my GMT BLNR last month, this is now the most comfortable! Just my .2c |
16 December 2018, 11:09 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 250
|
While the clasp on the subs are long, the adjustability is freaking fantastic. From winter to muggy heat, my wrist changes a good bit.
|
16 December 2018, 11:11 PM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
GMT2c doesnt have micro adjuster. That is the only downside of that.
My SubC fits perfect whether its freezing cold or in 40 degree Celsius weather - that micro adjuster is fantastic |
17 December 2018, 01:32 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 968
|
I’ve owned both a few times. GMT is much more comfortable for my 6.5”
Mainly because of case size. GL on Sub is great. But here is a wrinkle. Buy the Sub and throw an Everest strap that uses the GL clasp. I never thought anything would be more comfortable than a Daytona. Well the Sub on an Everest ruber with GL is beyond comfortable! If you are ok with the case size on your wrist this is the way to go! |
17 December 2018, 01:58 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 462
|
They are both comfortable. Not much difference imo.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
__________________
"The Secret of Life is to Enjoy It" |
17 December 2018, 11:53 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Northern Rockies
Posts: 260
|
Tried some stuff on today to try to help make my decision.
It did not help. |
17 December 2018, 12:04 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 41
|
Have both and can definitely feel the thicker caseback of the sub. So gmt sits lower on wrist and feels slightly better.
|
17 December 2018, 01:34 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: GEORGIA
Watch: 16610T Sub Date
Posts: 413
|
I still think a OP36 or DJ36 would be perfect for you!
|
17 December 2018, 02:49 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,614
|
My GMTc and Subc feel about the same to me on my wrist.
|
17 December 2018, 02:54 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 85
|
Hard to beat the glidelock
|
17 December 2018, 03:39 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Hanoi
Posts: 105
|
Owning both the SubC and GMT. I do feel that my GMT LN is more comfortable on the wrist than the Sub. So if you wasn’t comfortable wearing your LN, it would be not a good idea to go with the SubC given your wrist size. Have you ever thought of the DJ36?
|
18 December 2018, 02:04 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,639
|
Try wearing them slightly higher up behind your wrist bone, and not right over it. You look to have a fairly flat, fat free wrist. The deeper case back of the Sub might actually be slightly more comfortable if you wear it snugly behind your wrist bone.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
18 December 2018, 02:29 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,707
|
GMT is the most comfortable watch I’ve owned, and I’ve had most of the Rolex sports range.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
18 December 2018, 03:25 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Watch: Mickey Watch
Posts: 486
|
I've had a sub and a milgauss. I sold both because they wore wonky.
I finally settled on the GMT2. The GMT has been the most comfortable watch for me, and even when I'm not wearing it, I find myself asking myself why. The milgauss was the most uncomfortable out of the three. It felt too top heavy and uneven on my wrist. |
18 December 2018, 04:31 AM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
I was thinking that, too. I know something like that is personal preference, but wearing them so close to the hand makes them look bigger on the wrist. Also, the shirt cuffs in all the shots make it difficult to get an idea of just how the watches are fitting.
|
18 December 2018, 04:41 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
|
I have very small wrists too and my old Oyster Perpetual Date in 36mm fits quite nicely. Almost like it was custom made to fit me.
I also have the new Explorer - a good fit at 39mm (not bulky). At my AD I recently tried on an Oyster Perpetual in 39mm white dial. Great fit too, unlike the bulkier GMT and Sub. 36mm to 39mm Oyster Perpetual should be perfect for you, and they are very classy too. My most recent item is a year 2000 5-Digit Sub and it fits "OK" but just barely. Not nearly as comfortable for me for all day wear.
__________________
“The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind” Rolex "some" Tudor "some" Damasko "some" Misc Pieces "some" Marathon "some" GS Spring Drive "some" Hamilton "some" Findeisen "some" |
18 December 2018, 12:32 PM | #54 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Jerod
Location: Chicagoland Area
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
I did the exact same thing with the GMTc. It was a great watch but just too bulky. Bought a mkii Explorer 1 and the size is perfect. Feels just like my 5513. |
|
20 December 2018, 02:38 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Northern Rockies
Posts: 260
|
So after exploring various options I think I've decided I will go ahead and buy the Sub.
Here's my rationale/justification ():
|
20 December 2018, 03:20 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
|
|
20 December 2018, 03:24 AM | #57 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
|
Quote:
|
|
20 December 2018, 03:29 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: EU
Watch: ♕
Posts: 11,869
|
IMHO the GMTc wears more comfy.
__________________
♕16570 ♕126610 ♕126333 |
20 December 2018, 04:18 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: London
Posts: 133
|
I was thinking the same thing when reading the original quote. Really wish my 114060 had the GMTc case.
|
20 December 2018, 05:04 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: DC Metro
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 384
|
I think the difference is quite negligible. I was between a BLNR and SubC and opted for the SubC. I have a 6.5"-6.75" wrist. I was concerned about the fatter caseback of the SubC BUT the GMT actually is a thicker watch. So, while the SubC has a thicker case back, the case itself is slightly thinner than the GMT.
Overall, the wear is so similar that you won't notice a difference. Since you already decided on the SubC, will be interesting to see your thoughts because I agree with others that if you felt the GMT was too big than the SubC will be as well. However the lack of PCLs and amazing glidelock will make up for it (hopefully). Good luck and looking forward to your incoming!
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex SubC 116610LN |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.