The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 February 2014, 05:02 PM   #61
Challenger Deep
"TRF" Member
 
Challenger Deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: James
Location: Michigan
Watch: Omega Seamaster
Posts: 528
Both are popular watches.
__________________
"Overtook The Michael..."-Mika
"I need to establish my own limits. When i reach those limits, i am willing to overcome them and establish new ones. I do not know how far i can go. I have an understanding of wht i'm doing, but do not know how far it can take me."-Ayrton Senna.
Challenger Deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2014, 06:27 AM   #62
Eric Chan
"TRF" Member
 
Eric Chan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
Found this older thread when I was looking doing a search on this very topic.

Some very informative and intelligent posts, as usual. I have often pondered this same question and ulitmately decided on getting a 16610 LN instead of the 300M. That was before Rolex and Omega upgraded their watches to the current ceramic bezels. It would be interesting to see if anyone put some thought to the current two models of the Submariner Date and the Diver 300M. My knee jerk reaction would be to choose the Submariner Date, but I must admit, the 300M is a beauty.
Eric Chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2014, 07:15 AM   #63
francis
"TRF" Member
 
francis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: a few places
Watch: Datejust
Posts: 796
I own both and can tell you that while I like the look of the oyster bracelet, the seamaster bracelet is much more comfortable.. Also the bezel on the smp is very hard to use compared to the 16610. It is hard to get a good grip on in comparison
francis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2014, 11:01 AM   #64
Srhdad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 118
Main difference for me....walk on to an airplane and I'm guessing you'll see no less than a dozen Rolex's...at least half of those will be Submariners. A classic, of course, but jeez...I prefer a watch that isn't identical to everyone else's on the bus. Go Omega...still fairly common but not even close to the ubiquity of a Sub.
Srhdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 September 2014, 11:23 AM   #65
EEParker
"TRF" Member
 
EEParker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Parker
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 337
I own both. ('66 300m and Maxi V 5513 Sub). Both are great watches and I love how under-the-radar the Omega is.

That said, nothing beats a Sub in my opinion. It's just a flawless watch.
EEParker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2014, 12:33 AM   #66
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
I would not buy any Omgea or Rolex new.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2014, 08:57 AM   #67
oldbronco
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Ranger
Posts: 315

I agree with pdoukas. go vintage. everybody has a sub, but how many have something
unique like a Snowflake or a vintage SM300?

the vintage Omega 5xx movement & the vintage ETA movement (finished by Rolex) are
as tough & accurate as any modern movement. paraphrasing my Local Rolex trained
watch maker: "some modern movements are .2seconds more accurate than the earlier
ones. so, who cares?" finally, a good vintage is 1/3 the price as something new.
oldbronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2014, 10:06 AM   #68
joe100
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,753
Rolex is a Rolex but a Seamaster has cache of its own
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:00 AM   #69
SubTTKky
"TRF" Member
 
SubTTKky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Kky
Location: RolexLand
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 335
Icon14

Quote:
Originally Posted by KellyM3 View Post
As someone who learned by experience don't compromise get what you truly want
__________________


Rolex Sub16613,GMT IIC 116713,Daytona 116523 (Golden Champage with Diamonds),DD1803,18038,18238,DJ16233,DJ16014,Omega Speedy
SubTTKky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:49 AM   #70
JorgeCCW
"TRF" Member
 
JorgeCCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,675
SUB
I think Speedmaster series is the best for Omega
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing happens until something moves "
Albert Einstein
JorgeCCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 03:54 PM   #71
Eric Chan
"TRF" Member
 
Eric Chan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
rolex is a rolex but a seamaster has cache of its own
x2.
Eric Chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:21 PM   #72
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by JorgeCCW View Post
SUB

I think Speedmaster series is the best for Omega

very good value ,great history indeed but the SMP 300 Bond is a love forever
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 08:51 PM   #73
JorgeCCW
"TRF" Member
 
JorgeCCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passionata View Post
very good value ,great history indeed but the SMP 300 Bond is a love forever

Good value yes (more bang for your buck), not sure about love forever though, at least for me . I had 4 omegas before: 2 speedmasters (Moonwatch + Saphire with moon phase) and 2 Seamasters ( 300 m Bond + GMT Seamaster). And even though I appreciate them for what they are, don't feel compel to re-acquire them. So in my case is a "temporary love". Lol
But you never know.....
Good looking Seamaster by the way !!

Cheers !


Sent from the 3 Watches Philosophy Company headquarters
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing happens until something moves "
Albert Einstein
JorgeCCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2014, 09:28 AM   #74
silverbug
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 52
Having had a new ceramic Sub Date since February I had a yearning for a Seamaster 300m ceramic in blue and bought one 4 weeks ago.
The Omega was extremely comfortable on the wrist but I just couldn't get to love it and only wore it once during my brief ownership.
Ended up returning it to the place I bought it from within their return period and bought an Air-King instead.
It's made me appreciate my 116610LN even more TBH, its a beautiful watch and one that I never tire of just looking at......
__________________
Submariner 116610LN
Air-King 114200
silverbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2014, 04:15 AM   #75
Eric Chan
"TRF" Member
 
Eric Chan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbug View Post
Having had a new ceramic Sub Date since February I had a yearning for a Seamaster 300m ceramic in blue and bought one 4 weeks ago.
The Omega was extremely comfortable on the wrist but I just couldn't get to love it and only wore it once during my brief ownership.
Ended up returning it to the place I bought it from within their return period and bought an Air-King instead.
It's made me appreciate my 116610LN even more TBH, its a beautiful watch and one that I never tire of just looking at......
Thanks for sharing your experiences with the newer versions of the two watches.
Eric Chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2014, 06:11 PM   #76
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
The quality and the stats are very comparable, to answer the original question.

However, there is something intangible and magical about the Submariner. It can't be quantified or explained (by me, anyway).

And by the way, the core of my collection is three Rolex and three Omega, so I'm not really biased. But still, there's something about a Rolex...
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2014, 02:46 AM   #77
Charles Ford
"TRF" Member
 
Charles Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Arizona
Watch: 67' Zodiac Seawolf
Posts: 82
I own a sub, a 16610 I purchase new in 1996 at a Hong Kong Jewelry shop for $1,700, stopped wearing it years ago when I became passé looking with all the copies, clones, homages and fakes. It's now safely tucked away in a safety deposit box for my oldest boy when I croak.

I also own a Tag Aquaracer WAN 2111 which has more then assuaged my desire for a Seamaster.

Both of these watches to me are boring looking, that's why I picked up this gem a month ago, don't see many of these on anyone's wrist, and people notice, and NO one, I mean No one asks me if it's real of not like they do my sub,

Charles Ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2014, 02:58 AM   #78
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
one more thought ,,, smp can be had in quartz ,,, if its a watch you put down a lot , it can be really handy to just pick it up and the time be right ,,,,,
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2014, 04:26 AM   #79
Charles Ford
"TRF" Member
 
Charles Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Arizona
Watch: 67' Zodiac Seawolf
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by dysondiver View Post
one more thought ,,, smp can be had in quartz ,,, if its a watch you put down a lot , it can be really handy to just pick it up and the time be right ,,,,,
Not any of the new models, quartz is now out!

Kind of hard to figure why Omega did that, since the future King of England wears a quartz SMP exclusively??

Charles Ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2014, 10:32 AM   #80
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbug View Post
Having had a new ceramic Sub Date since February I had a yearning for a Seamaster 300m ceramic in blue and bought one 4 weeks ago.
The Omega was extremely comfortable on the wrist but I just couldn't get to love it and only wore it once during my brief ownership.
Ended up returning it to the place I bought it from within their return period and bought an Air-King instead.
It's made me appreciate my 116610LN even more TBH, its a beautiful watch and one that I never tire of just looking at......
For an Air King? That's the least loved Rollie of all!
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2014, 12:07 PM   #81
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
From my perspective the SMP Bond which I have is a great watch. It cost a fraction of the price of a Sub, works just as well, and it is also iconic although admittedly not as much as the Subs. The Sea Masters change frequently and don't really maintain identity other than through the branding where as with the Subs, they all seem to line up much closer to the original genetics of the model.

__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2014, 12:11 PM   #82
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Ford View Post
Not any of the new models, quartz is now out!

Kind of hard to figure why Omega did that, since the future King of England wears a quartz SMP exclusively??

I believe he prince wears it because it was a gift from his mother.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2014, 12:23 PM   #83
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,812
I have a different version of the SM300 made from NOS Omega parts that I love. I like it even more than my old SD and at a much better price point.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 116710BLNR & 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Heuer Heritage Autavia; Nomos Club Sport Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & Superocean 44; Seiko Black Monster; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2014, 12:33 PM   #84
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
New vs new, I believe that the Planet Ocean is comparable to the Sub (116610). The SMP is not in the same category.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2014, 07:11 AM   #85
Charles Ford
"TRF" Member
 
Charles Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Arizona
Watch: 67' Zodiac Seawolf
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baco Noir View Post
I have a different version of the SM300 made from NOS Omega parts that I love. I like it even more than my old SD and at a much better price point.
This watch on mesh is absolutely killer, so is my LLD!

Charles Ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2014, 07:35 AM   #86
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Ford View Post
This watch on mesh is absolutely killer, so is my LLD!

Agreed! The mesh gave me a totally new love for the watch. The OEM bracelet just felt light and cheap and without the fliplock clasp popped open occasionally. Now, it's one of the favorites in my collection.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 116710BLNR & 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Heuer Heritage Autavia; Nomos Club Sport Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & Superocean 44; Seiko Black Monster; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2014, 12:45 PM   #87
Charles Ford
"TRF" Member
 
Charles Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Arizona
Watch: 67' Zodiac Seawolf
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baco Noir View Post
Agreed! The mesh gave me a totally new love for the watch. The OEM bracelet just felt light and cheap and without the fliplock clasp popped open occasionally. Now, it's one of the favorites in my collection.
What brand of mesh did you put on your SMP? Mines a Staib.
Charles Ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2014, 01:32 PM   #88
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Ford View Post
What brand of mesh did you put on your SMP? Mines a Staib.
Same here. Best on the market that I found. Built solid, but very comfortable.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 116710BLNR & 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Heuer Heritage Autavia; Nomos Club Sport Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & Superocean 44; Seiko Black Monster; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2014, 02:04 PM   #89
Eric Chan
"TRF" Member
 
Eric Chan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
New vs new, I believe that the Planet Ocean is comparable to the Sub (116610). The SMP is not in the same category.
Did not think of the PO as a direct comparison to the Sub Date (116610). In my opinion, the new SD would make a good comparison to the PO, especially with the SD's higher depth rating.

In any event, whatever watch is chosen will be a great addition to any collection.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Eric Chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2014, 10:49 AM   #90
Cboy038
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 20
great info!
Cboy038 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.