![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,873
|
Ruined!
I've had quite the Panerai collection but I've found myself increasingly only wearing one. The 372 has ruined the brand for me and I can honestly say that (for now) I'd be content if I only had the 372 as my sole Panerai - and it's not even gold! Have you been ruined by a particular model?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Lately I only wear those 3
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Tom
Location: USA
Posts: 1,264
|
Mike, all I think about is the 372. Such a simple and beautiful piece. It is for sure my next purchase. Looks great on your wrist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,673
|
whether one piece or several, every collection should have at least one panerai, IMO.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,691
|
I totally agree with you; I came to the same conclusion some time ago. if you are gonna have a Panerai just buy the 372 and I you would be good for life, plus you will save money
![]() It's a classic
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Nothing happens until something moves " Albert Einstein |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,250
|
Very sweet peice
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() The key words are "(for now)", mate! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Panos
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: 16710
Posts: 8,704
|
Not ruined, Mike but at the moment the only Panerai that i have in the collection is the 372. I am pretty sure that 372 is here to stay.
The other day i was thinking what other Panerai has the same qualities as the 372 for long time ownership. For me is the 232. 372 and 232, the perfect duo if you want to have tons of Panerai DNA but not willing to spend tons of money. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,893
|
I so wanted to like the 372 / 422 ... but they are just so big @ 47mm :(
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHILA
Posts: 1,720
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: nicholas
Location: ottawa canada
Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai
Posts: 9,623
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,080
|
Quote:
![]() I don't have a base yet, so who knows.... ![]() ![]()
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: nicholas
Location: ottawa canada
Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai
Posts: 9,623
|
I am still undecided between the 372 and 422.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Aldrin
Location: Manila
Watch: PAM000,183,212,IWC
Posts: 266
|
I know exactly how you feel Mike. But with this passion that we have for horology I doubt if your love for just one PAM will be satisfied. I used to say that for my 000, 212 and 183 but with my 372, I feel that the beast has been fed. Till that 389 showed up at the AD window.
![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
232 ruined me.
![]()
__________________
member#3242 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,419
|
I can see why. Pure PAM dna.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Anthony
Location: California
Watch: Rolex/AP/Panerai
Posts: 1,641
|
The 305 does it for me, even though I would never get rid of my 233.
![]()
__________________
"You can never buy back Time, so spend it wisely." ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.