The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 March 2020, 03:10 AM   #1
AEC
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,239
Upgrade my Radiomir Black Seal to a Radiomir 424?

I wear a Radiomir Black Seal 754 now (45mm case). I dig it a bunch, and I think I want to stay with a Radiomir and upgrade to the 47mm 424, but I would buy one without seeing or trying it on first.

I'll be grateful to hear how the 47mm wire-lug 424 feels on the wrist as compared to the 45mm wire-lug Radiomir. Big difference? Small difference?

For reference, here's a photo of the 47mm 424 that I swiped from the internet, followed by my own photos of my 45mm Black Seal on my wrist.

Thanks in advance!





AEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2020, 08:17 AM   #2
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,475
It’ll be wider, yes, but thicker, too. Enough so that it’s definitely worth trying on before flipping.

Consider also a 232 or 249, both of which are classic 47 Rads that are notably thinner.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2020, 11:02 AM   #3
Joearch
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,471
I have owned a number of Radiomirs over the last 15 years. I currently have a 292 which is a ceramic and a 424 that you are considering. They do wear different. The biggest difference mentioned above is that the 424 is much thicker. I think we need to try watches on before the purchase.




You can see the 424 is larger, but for me it still is great on the wrist. I also have a 372 which since it is a Luminor wears much larger than the 424, so I am used to a larger watch. I guess the larger watch is not a big deal as I have a number of watches that range in size so none are worn for more that a day or so.
Joearch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2020, 11:38 PM   #4
burneyr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Burney
Location: N. Florida
Posts: 69
I love the California dial and logo, but I was surprised to find the watch is so thick. It felt like a brick in comparison to my 232.

Sorry it is not a direct comparison as you ask, but it sits higher on the wrist than other 47mm Rads.

FWIW
burneyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2020, 08:57 AM   #5
AEC
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,239
Guys, thanks for taking time to share your experiences and advice. I did get the sense from photos that the thickness would be the real difference, and it seems this is confirmed in your responses.

I'm leaning toward trading, so I'll keep The Forum posted
AEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.