ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
26 April 2013, 03:23 AM | #1 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
|
New Yachtmaster II Stainless Steel
I love this watch..
It's been a long time coming and tempted me sorely in original white gold.. The movement is nothing short of a mechanical computer marvel, although it is limited in it's abilities and geared for regatta racers and club-house yachtsmen.. Still, in person it is stunning. I'm afraid that they will set the price beyond what I want to pay for a Stainless Steel watch so I won't have one on my wrist any time soon.. However, I put this one in the category of the old moon phase and highly complicated watches that Rolex collectors now search ceaselessly for and pay astronomical figures to have.. Yes, if you are wanting a true future "collectible" that will bring huge box-office figures, this is the one to get.. YM II 2.jpg YMII 1.jpg
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
26 April 2013, 03:25 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Its nice for the YM2 fans of the world, a bit more accessable than the gold versions. I can also see this becoming a collectable in time.
|
26 April 2013, 03:33 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Larry, it seems to me that the WG model will be VERY scarce in future generations. The fact that you will be able to get one in SS now will surely decrease sales of the WG model.
Doesn't it seem that the WG model will be even more collectible?
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
26 April 2013, 03:54 AM | #4 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,049
|
Quote:
This one has the potential to sell more and, therefore, be more distributed in the community. A high dollar collectible needs three things.. 1. It needs to be somewhat rare. Moon Phases and Newmans are that. This one will not fly off the shelves but will still move. 2. It needs to have appeal. Again, this has that (both pro and con), whereas some extremely rare models (like the Sub 168000) simply don't appeal to anybody. 3. It must be attainable.. That means that there must be enough of them to be more than a footnote in a book, but tangible and available at some level.. If enough of the SS models are sold to hit all three buttons, it will be a mega-hit with the WG simply icing for the elite few collectors with deep pockets..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
26 April 2013, 03:30 AM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,736
|
Agree that it'll be beyond any SS price from Rolex in the past. It will set a new record on that score for sure.
But it is on my short list to get in the next few years.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
26 April 2013, 04:10 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Agreed, at least until (if) the SS Sky Dweller comes out.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
26 April 2013, 04:18 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 32,224
|
I do like it, but not enough for me to justify the price tag it will carry.
A good look for sure though. |
26 April 2013, 04:21 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
It looks real nice! I am sure I will be taking a good look at it when it comes out, but I am sure the price tag will be 17-19K
|
26 April 2013, 04:29 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,736
|
I think the WG will be less visible on wrists over time because the SS will capture a lot of YM-II customers.
But I also think that the WG model's bezel will become the #1 mod on the SS YM-II. It would make it the perfect pairing for owners of the existing Platty 40mm YM.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
26 April 2013, 04:33 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: RI
Watch: GMT II C
Posts: 45
|
I would love a YMII in any configuration!
SS just gets me a little closer .... Some day! That is my favorite Rolex.
__________________
// 16610 "F Series" (sold) // 116710 "G Series" // 79160 Ladies Datejust "silver stick" (wife's) |
26 April 2013, 04:33 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,384
|
none is buy the WG thats y they made the SS?
|
26 April 2013, 04:37 AM | #12 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 DATE-JUST41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 49,610
|
This is the winner of this year from Rolex. Just amazing piece!
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
26 April 2013, 04:41 AM | #13 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 DATEJUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Aamir
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Watch: Patek, Rolex
Posts: 32,038
|
If the Msrp is around 16K i will buy this watch.
|
26 April 2013, 05:01 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
|
|
26 April 2013, 04:42 AM | #15 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 DATEJUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Aamir
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Watch: Patek, Rolex
Posts: 32,038
|
Would any one of you sell the full 18kt YG gold to buy this? i simply do not wear the YG as much since i have an 18Kt GMT (which i dont wear much) & i have a DD II rose (which i dont wear much)
|
26 April 2013, 05:59 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here!
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,366
|
__________________
16610LN | 16613LB | 16710 Pepsi | 118238 | 116500 (White) | 116500 (Black) | 116710BLNR | 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."
|
26 April 2013, 11:43 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Quote:
but in your case it may be a good idea. I have found I dont were my YG sub or GMT that much, or even the RG Daytona so everyone is different!! For me once I started wearing the YM II I really liked the 44 mm size! as for the wrist size mine is 6.5 inches and fits to me great! |
|
27 April 2013, 12:03 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Bill
Location: PHX AZ
Watch: DSSD,Yacht I, II
Posts: 102
|
Love it. The size is perfect. Nice collection btw, the white face really pops out.
|
27 April 2013, 01:23 PM | #19 | |
⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 DATEJUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Aamir
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Watch: Patek, Rolex
Posts: 32,038
|
Tom that is a great collection. I love the YMIi shot with the Porsche keys.
Quote:
|
|
28 April 2013, 03:00 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Thousand Oaks
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,017
|
You have those beautiful watches and you don't wear them much.......what then do you wear??????
|
26 April 2013, 04:42 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: RI
Watch: GMT II C
Posts: 45
|
... I guess I would not be too happy if I already owned a YMII in WG and then they released SS that is pretty close.
Would be like paying for a Blue "smurf" to have a SS come a year later. Regardless, love the new YMII, I agree, top of the 2013 release.
__________________
// 16610 "F Series" (sold) // 116710 "G Series" // 79160 Ladies Datejust "silver stick" (wife's) |
26 April 2013, 05:41 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
I own a 116619, and it wouldn't hurt my feelings at all if they came out with the SS version next year at Basel.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
26 April 2013, 04:44 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: Canada
Watch: The Sky
Posts: 1,824
|
It's too big and top heavy for my tastes
Still don't like the yachtmaster ii on the bezel Cool piece |
26 April 2013, 04:58 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Alan
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 114270 16710B
Posts: 1,062
|
I actually think the availability of a SS version, will depress used prices of the YG/WG versions. I say this because given the choice of a used YG/WG version, or a new SS version, many buyers will opt for the new SS, unless the used ones are attractively priced.
Of course, this depends on the delta. . . |
26 April 2013, 05:23 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Stick the bezel from the WG model on & who would know the difference...? The lume surrounds are different but who cares...?
I'm a huge admirer of the Yacht-Master II. I tried one on when they first came out & was so impressed. I would have no use for the complication but it would give me a warm fuzzy feeling inside to know that it's there. No date would be a pain, but I could get around that. Wear a Day date on my other wrist!! This watch isn't photogenic- you have to see it in the flesh & wear it. It's not top heavy at all & I wore the gold version. It's wonderfully comfy. .
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
26 April 2013, 05:42 AM | #26 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 DATEJUST41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Aamir
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Watch: Patek, Rolex
Posts: 32,038
|
I have a small wrist. Does it look overly big to you guys?
|
26 April 2013, 11:29 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Nick
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 759
|
My opinion is a resounding YES, but who cares what I think? If you're happy then wear it proudly.
I suppose I should wait until I see it in the flesh to pass judgement, but at 44mm I can't say I've ever been interested in the Yachtmaster II. |
26 April 2013, 08:52 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Geert
Location: Belgium
Watch: rolex/JLC/panerai
Posts: 5,612
|
|
27 April 2013, 12:18 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
I have small wrists too, so I understand your position. I think it looks large, but not outside what would be considered reasonable today. If standards change back towards the historical norm, then it would probably be too large.
|
30 April 2013, 04:59 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Rolex&911Nation
Watch: GV
Posts: 547
|
No that is a great look, I am liking the all gold look w that white face even more post viewing your photo.
__________________
16710 116400GV 116710LN 116500LN 116610LV |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.