ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

watchboy · 9 April 2008, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2careless

Guys, without any proof that one person is purported to be another person (as described in watchnet or any other forums), it's most unwise for us to speculate.
We don't want any defamation lawsuits.

I am a victim of his and I have all the proof in emails and payment that I had made. It is too long to forward them here. You can email me and I can forward them to you.

watchboy · 9 April 2008, 04:08 PM

Ok if any one still in doubt and our "friend" panic and defended himself, why not those who does not believe, try to go ahead to buy his 16613 P series for $3400? If the buyer gets the watch, I volunteer to buy it over for the same price from the buyer!

2careless · 9 April 2008, 04:34 PM

Please, just let the mods do what they need to do. They are the people entrusted to maintain this forum and they will do the required to keep up the integrity of this place. So, pm the mods and let them sort it out, ok?

watchboy · 9 April 2008, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2careless

Please, just let the mods do what they need to do. They are the people entrusted to maintain this forum and they will do the required to keep up the integrity of this place. So, pm the mods and let them sort it out, ok?

If you have read CAREFULLY, the mod (Welshwatchman) already said that the case is already attended in the backstage.

Alcan · 9 April 2008, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchboy

If you have read CAREFULLY, the mod (Welshwatchman) already said that the case is already attended in the backstage.

Then leave it at that.

mailman · 10 April 2008, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchboy

If you have read CAREFULLY, the mod (Welshwatchman) already said that the case is already attended in the backstage.

You're right. Paul said it.

We appreciate you looking out for everyone here and pasing on the info, but for the time being this thread has run it's course.

Welshwatchman · 12 April 2008, 11:32 AM

No1Panerai was asked to provide current pictures of the watch for sale, specifically set to a time of our choice, therefore proving that the watch was in his possession.

This has not occurred, nor has a response been forthcoming after 3 days. One other matter that I won't reveal on this thread also gives me a little cause for concern.

There is insufficient evidence to prove that No1Panerai is the scam artist who conned the other member. That needs to be followed through with the authorities by the member concerned.

However, when I tot up the infraction points amassed by No1Panerai they add up to a ban.

Thread done.

12 April 2008, 11:32 AM	#37
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	No1Panerai was asked to provide current pictures of the watch for sale, specifically set to a time of our choice, therefore proving that the watch was in his possession. This has not occurred, nor has a response been forthcoming after 3 days. One other matter that I won't reveal on this thread also gives me a little cause for concern. There is insufficient evidence to prove that No1Panerai is the scam artist who conned the other member. That needs to be followed through with the authorities by the member concerned. However, when I tot up the infraction points amassed by No1Panerai they add up to a ban. Thread done. __________________ ..33

9 April 2008, 04:08 PM	#32
watchboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Jacky Location: Watch World Posts: 244	Ok if any one still in doubt and our "friend" panic and defended himself, why not those who does not believe, try to go ahead to buy his 16613 P series for $3400? If the buyer gets the watch, I volunteer to buy it over for the same price from the buyer!

9 April 2008, 04:34 PM	#33
2careless "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Melbourne, AU Watch: Pepsi Posts: 4,369	Please, just let the mods do what they need to do. They are the people entrusted to maintain this forum and they will do the required to keep up the integrity of this place. So, pm the mods and let them sort it out, ok?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)