ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jwalker497 · 21 February 2018, 12:53 PM

I went to 2 local ADs, neither had a true comparison but based on al the pictures ive seen online, it seems the DJII is a little bigger?! Is this true, does anyone have both or have seen both can chime in? The flutes on the new 41 DJ seems to be smaller, the whole watch seems to be daintier, regardless of what bracelet it is on. Am I off? Please help. thanks

Chadridv · 21 February 2018, 01:28 PM

Yeah you’re not wrong.

They’re different watches, similar, yes, but it’s a different design.

The DJ2 case is bigger, thicker, with bigger markers, and a little bit of a wider bezel (I think).

The DJ2 looks almost inflated in comparison.

Matteo E · 21 February 2018, 01:31 PM

I read the Explorer II and DJ II share the same case. Wouldn’t surprise me, the DJ II is substantial, that’s why I like it.

jwalker497 · 21 February 2018, 01:34 PM

I love the fluted bezel but I also like the super size of the DJII case. To me, the new 41 seems like an old the old 36mm but maybe in 38 now, stil small and meek in comparison, if the bracelet isn't a deal breaker for you either way

Uppersouth · 21 February 2018, 03:50 PM

Very different watches indeed. The DJ41 is has a closer feel to a DJ36. I’ve always liked the proportions of the DJ2 better. Much sportier, but I realize what most didn’t like about the proportions were in fact what I liked.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

DavidUK · 21 February 2018, 08:59 PM

I went from DJ36 to DJ41 (which measures 39.84mm across the case) but I did try a couple of DJII models side by side with the DJ41 prior to purchase. The DJ41 is not "dainty" but it is slimmer and better proportioned, in line with the DJ range. DJII was too "fat" for my liking but each to their own.

If considering the DJII, you really should try it next to a DJ41 to make sure your choice is a good one.

Oh... and of course you'll be stuck with an oyster bracelet on the DJII - a real no no if you don't like looking at a scratched bracelet after a few weeks. The jubilee always remains looking pristine (I wore one daily for 15 years on my DJ36 and it always looked immaculate).

rkim11 · 22 February 2018, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uppersouth

Very different watches indeed. The DJ41 is has a closer feel to a DJ36. I’ve always liked the proportions of the DJ2 better. Much sportier, but I realize what most didn’t like about the proportions were in fact what I liked.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The DJ2 is gorgeous. Big and bold.

c41006 · 22 February 2018, 02:27 AM

The proportions on the DJ II are off in my opinion. The DJ 41 keeps more of the classic DJ proportions. In my mind I think of the DDII and DJII as unsuccessful attempts by Rolex to make larger versions of the classics but then they got it right with the DD40 and DJ41.

Pol1 · 22 February 2018, 02:31 AM

Datejust II old : 41mm diameter; 12,22mm thick; 3136 movement; 48 h power reserve
Datejust 41 (2016) : 41mm diameter; 11,70mm thick; 3235 movement, 70h power reserve
Notches of the old are a bit wider. Indexes on the dial are a little bit wider too.

samson66 · 22 February 2018, 02:33 AM

rkim11 · 22 February 2018, 02:37 AM

^^^To me, the one on the left looks better. Some want sporty and bold, some want traditional and conservative. Both beautiful.

GMT Aviator · 22 February 2018, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pol1

Datejust II old : 41mm diameter; 12,22mm thick; 3136 movement; 48 h power reserve
Datejust 41 (2016) : 41mm diameter; 11,70mm thick; 3235 movement, 70h power reserve
Notches of the old are a bit wider. Indexes on the dial are a little bit wider too.

Almost but not quite. The DJ41 does not in fact have a 41mm case, its smaller than the DJ2 which is indeed 41mm.

The DJ2 vs DJ41 debate will rage on forever. I liked the DJ2 so much that I have three in total. The term describing the DJ2 as out of proportion is non-sense. Out of proportion to what exactly? Itself or the 36? It was never supposed to be an upscaled replica of a 36 which I think many people hoped it would or should have been.
The DJ2 was a new design. A sporty more youthful take on the traditional look of the classic DJ36 and I believe it achieved that very well. It has its own proportions that suit it very well.
The 41 is a great watch, I like it, but I would personally still pick the DJ2 over the 41 again. Other than a DJ2 I'd go for a 36 in all likelihood.

chloebear · 22 February 2018, 01:22 PM

They are very different watches. To me the DJ2 is sportier and the DJ41 is dressier. They are both beautiful. In general I'd say most folks on TRF prefer the DJ41. I'm in the minority, but I absolutely love the DJ2. So sporty. It'd be a good time to pick one up.

robinmgb · 23 June 2019, 04:36 PM

I compared the two models yesterday and would say I preferred the DJ2 because the bezel is slightly larger but the difference is really very small, I was shocked just how similar they are after reading so much about the differences and ‘wrong proportions’ of the DJ2, it’s all been over exaggerated in my opinion, I imagined them being totally different watches and they simply aren’t!

robinmgb · 23 June 2019, 04:39 PM

Just to point out I was referring of course to the look of the watches not the movement, each one I viewed were on oyster bracelets with fluted bezels and diamond dials

DD9506 · 23 June 2019, 08:14 PM

Both very nice.

The jubilee is a grower imo having previously preferred the oyster. However the laster GMTs probably helped convince me re the jubilee.

RolexFan007 · 23 June 2019, 09:36 PM

Another thread with same topic

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=649360

Solo118 · 23 June 2019, 10:38 PM

Think of the DJ2 a baggy pants, and the DJ41 is slim fit.

baybombers · 24 June 2019, 11:34 AM

I’ve had my DJII for 6 years or so and still love it. I agree with others who describe it as a sportier version of a DJ.

illmaticnyc · 24 June 2019, 11:42 AM

dj 41!

jeanjean · 24 June 2019, 06:10 PM

DJ 41 is more comfortable to wear similar
to OP 39. 114300.DJ2 is more bulky and sportier
but not that comfortable to wear.

Shamorai · 24 June 2019, 06:30 PM

I think the DJ2 looks better.
Both nice, but the DJ2 looks a bit more......exciting?

Lex_Ordo · 31 August 2019, 01:26 PM

I picked the DJII, simply because of the 41mm dial. The bonus was the oyster bracelet. For me it is a nice balance. I have a couple GMTs, and the DJII gives me a dressier look as compared to my GMT when I want to wear it like that.

scarlet knight · 31 August 2019, 01:32 PM

Here is my DJ 2. I like it.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Panych · 31 August 2019, 01:42 PM

Excellent watch for any occasions.

ronricks · 31 August 2019, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwalker497

I went to 2 local ADs, neither had a true comparison but based on al the pictures ive seen online, it seems the DJII is a little bigger?! Is this true, does anyone have both or have seen both can chime in? The flutes on the new 41 DJ seems to be smaller, the whole watch seems to be daintier, regardless of what bracelet it is on. Am I off? Please help. thanks

Datejust 41 is only 39.xx mm.

AdamWay · 31 August 2019, 01:49 PM

DJ2 is Handsome, Bold, Clean, easy to read Big index.

AdamWay · 31 August 2019, 01:52 PM

Jubilee bracelet makes it look smaller but still Classic, Oyster Bracelet make it looks Bold.. but I still like the Jubilee classic and timeless.

Rado63 · 31 August 2019, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baybombers

I’ve had my DJII for 6 years or so and still love it. I agree with others who describe it as a sportier version of a DJ.

Yes this it, it's the sportier version , bigger watch than DJ41, great if your wrist size can handle the 41 mm. I owned both , sold the DJ41 because its only approximately 39 mm. DJ41 is classical proportions meaning it is more in the traditional dress watch category. My guess is that DJII was probably too large for some markets and was ultimately re sized.

Bizcut1 · 31 August 2019, 02:24 PM

Love them both. Wear the Jubilee on my DJ41.

21 February 2018, 12:53 PM	#1
jwalker497 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: USA Posts: 191	Datejust 41 vs Datejust II I went to 2 local ADs, neither had a true comparison but based on al the pictures ive seen online, it seems the DJII is a little bigger?! Is this true, does anyone have both or have seen both can chime in? The flutes on the new 41 DJ seems to be smaller, the whole watch seems to be daintier, regardless of what bracelet it is on. Am I off? Please help. thanks

21 February 2018, 01:28 PM	#2
Chadridv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chadri Location: LI, NY Watch: 116610LV Posts: 11,343	Yeah you’re not wrong. They’re different watches, similar, yes, but it’s a different design. The DJ2 case is bigger, thicker, with bigger markers, and a little bit of a wider bezel (I think). The DJ2 looks almost inflated in comparison. __________________ - i͞n͟s͞t͟a͞g͞r͟a͞m͞ @ⓒⓄⓁⒹⓒⒶⓈⒺⓦⒶⒶⓉⒸⒽⒺⓈ

21 February 2018, 03:50 PM	#5
Uppersouth "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Lee Location: Kentucky Watch: SWISS Posts: 1,531	Very different watches indeed. The DJ41 is has a closer feel to a DJ36. I’ve always liked the proportions of the DJ2 better. Much sportier, but I realize what most didn’t like about the proportions were in fact what I liked. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk __________________ Two roads diverged in a wood, and I— I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. -ROBERT FROST

23 June 2019, 09:36 PM	#17
RolexFan007 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2018 Real Name: Frank Location: US and AU Watch: YM2 116680 Posts: 545	Another thread with same topic https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=649360 __________________ --------------------------------------

21 February 2018, 01:31 PM	#3
Matteo E "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2017 Posts: 358	I read the Explorer II and DJ II share the same case. Wouldn’t surprise me, the DJ II is substantial, that’s why I like it.

21 February 2018, 01:34 PM	#4
jwalker497 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: USA Posts: 191	I love the fluted bezel but I also like the super size of the DJII case. To me, the new 41 seems like an old the old 36mm but maybe in 38 now, stil small and meek in comparison, if the bracelet isn't a deal breaker for you either way

21 February 2018, 08:59 PM	#6
DavidUK "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Leicestershire UK Posts: 697	I went from DJ36 to DJ41 (which measures 39.84mm across the case) but I did try a couple of DJII models side by side with the DJ41 prior to purchase. The DJ41 is not "dainty" but it is slimmer and better proportioned, in line with the DJ range. DJII was too "fat" for my liking but each to their own. If considering the DJII, you really should try it next to a DJ41 to make sure your choice is a good one. Oh... and of course you'll be stuck with an oyster bracelet on the DJII - a real no no if you don't like looking at a scratched bracelet after a few weeks. The jubilee always remains looking pristine (I wore one daily for 15 years on my DJ36 and it always looked immaculate).

22 February 2018, 02:27 AM	#8
c41006 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Joshua Location: Atlanta Watch: Pelagos Posts: 7,918	The proportions on the DJ II are off in my opinion. The DJ 41 keeps more of the classic DJ proportions. In my mind I think of the DDII and DJII as unsuccessful attempts by Rolex to make larger versions of the classics but then they got it right with the DD40 and DJ41.

22 February 2018, 02:31 AM	#9
Pol1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Location: Belgium Posts: 226	Datejust II old : 41mm diameter; 12,22mm thick; 3136 movement; 48 h power reserve Datejust 41 (2016) : 41mm diameter; 11,70mm thick; 3235 movement, 70h power reserve Notches of the old are a bit wider. Indexes on the dial are a little bit wider too.

22 February 2018, 02:33 AM	#10
samson66 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Eastern Shore, MD Watch: my money leaving! Posts: 12,903

22 February 2018, 02:37 AM	#11
rkim11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Baltimore Watch: 16610LV Posts: 311	^^^To me, the one on the left looks better. Some want sporty and bold, some want traditional and conservative. Both beautiful.

22 February 2018, 01:22 PM	#13
chloebear Banned Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Mike Location: USA Watch: Explorer Posts: 2,902	They are very different watches. To me the DJ2 is sportier and the DJ41 is dressier. They are both beautiful. In general I'd say most folks on TRF prefer the DJ41. I'm in the minority, but I absolutely love the DJ2. So sporty. It'd be a good time to pick one up.

23 June 2019, 04:36 PM	#14
robinmgb "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: Kent, England Watch: Hublot BB Unico Posts: 1,089	I compared the two models yesterday and would say I preferred the DJ2 because the bezel is slightly larger but the difference is really very small, I was shocked just how similar they are after reading so much about the differences and ‘wrong proportions’ of the DJ2, it’s all been over exaggerated in my opinion, I imagined them being totally different watches and they simply aren’t!

23 June 2019, 04:39 PM	#15
robinmgb "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: Kent, England Watch: Hublot BB Unico Posts: 1,089	Just to point out I was referring of course to the look of the watches not the movement, each one I viewed were on oyster bracelets with fluted bezels and diamond dials

23 June 2019, 08:14 PM	#16
DD9506 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Manc, UK Watch: Sub C,Navi&Pam392 Posts: 15	Both very nice. The jubilee is a grower imo having previously preferred the oyster. However the laster GMTs probably helped convince me re the jubilee.

23 June 2019, 10:38 PM	#18
Solo118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 6,063	Think of the DJ2 a baggy pants, and the DJ41 is slim fit.

24 June 2019, 11:34 AM	#19
baybombers "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Paul Location: Central Time Zone Posts: 139	I’ve had my DJII for 6 years or so and still love it. I agree with others who describe it as a sportier version of a DJ.

24 June 2019, 11:42 AM	#20
illmaticnyc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: nyc Posts: 6	dj 41!

24 June 2019, 06:10 PM	#21
jeanjean Banned Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: MN Posts: 91	DJ 41 is more comfortable to wear similar to OP 39. 114300.DJ2 is more bulky and sportier but not that comfortable to wear.

24 June 2019, 06:30 PM	#22
Shamorai "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Sydney Watch: 16523, 116610LV Posts: 762	I think the DJ2 looks better. Both nice, but the DJ2 looks a bit more......exciting?

31 August 2019, 01:26 PM	#23
Lex_Ordo "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: NY, USA Posts: 298	I picked the DJII, simply because of the 41mm dial. The bonus was the oyster bracelet. For me it is a nice balance. I have a couple GMTs, and the DJII gives me a dressier look as compared to my GMT when I want to wear it like that.

31 August 2019, 01:32 PM	#24
scarlet knight "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Watch: Good ones Posts: 8,146	Here is my DJ 2. I like it. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

31 August 2019, 01:42 PM	#25
Panych "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: 007 Posts: 327	Excellent watch for any occasions.

31 August 2019, 01:49 PM	#27
AdamWay "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2019 Location: Singapore Posts: 6	DJ2 is Handsome, Bold, Clean, easy to read Big index.

31 August 2019, 01:52 PM	#28
AdamWay "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2019 Location: Singapore Posts: 6	Jubilee bracelet makes it look smaller but still Classic, Oyster Bracelet make it looks Bold.. but I still like the Jubilee classic and timeless.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)