ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 July 2017, 03:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 4
|
Water resistance of unworn, aged stock
Hi everyone
I wonder if somebody could help. I'm considering buy an Explorer I - in unworn condition - from 2001. My question is: can I use assume it will be as waterproof as a brand new watch...or will time and lack of use have played a part in a lack of efficacy in this or any other regard? I swim in the sea most days... Many thanks in advance and apologies if it's a stupid question! |
21 July 2017, 04:02 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,355
|
Not a stupid question, I assume it's OK but for peace of mind just have it tested. Most watchmakers can do it and usually it's quick and cheap.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
21 July 2017, 06:05 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 4
|
Thanks. Sound advice.
|
21 July 2017, 06:47 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 5,963
|
I would definitely have it tested.
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
23 July 2017, 12:40 AM | #5 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,476
|
Replace the gaskets.
|
23 July 2017, 07:39 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Bill
Location: Colorado USA
Watch: Rolex 16600
Posts: 214
|
It needs to be pressure tested and all watchmakers don't have that equipment. Most have somebody they can send it to for that. Gaskets and seals may or may not be good with time. Having them replaced is not guarrantee that it will be water tight. Only pressure testing will guarrantee it will be water tight.
|
23 July 2017, 09:37 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 249
|
The watch's water resistance largely depends upon gaskets.
Gaskets are made of rubber, and rubber degrades, stiffens & becomes more brittle with age, so even if the unworn watch has (as is likely) been kept in clement environmental conditions, I wouldn't go near water without at very least a quick & easy pressure test from an AD. That will probably be a 'dry' air pressure test though. As regards the internal movement, you'll encounter many schools of thought. Being unused, the parts will be new & unworn, but their remaining so in later usage will very much depend upon the efficacy of the oil used. Modern oils don't displace or degrade as readily as their predecessors, and the biggest cause of thickening is exposure to oxygen. My opinion is that degradation happens most readily through 'churn' of oil in movement - certain parts within a watch move upwards of half a million times a day - i.e. as parts move, more of the oil surface is exposed to oxygen. So, the oils may still be ok at present. All that said, I personally wouldn't be keen to spend that much on a quality 16-year old watch and then jump into the ocean. Plenty of cheap (but excellent) Seikos or G-shocks can do that for you and be kept in a changing bag, if you must know the time whilst swimming. Better to pressure test it, wear for a while on dry land to gauge the performance, and factor in a full service in a few years - after that, you'll have zero cause for concern about sporting such a lovely & capable watch in any conditions, wet or otherwise. |
23 July 2017, 11:33 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Willy
Location: AU, SG, MY
Posts: 1,248
|
Salt & sand are pretty hard on metals, even SS.
|
23 July 2017, 09:09 PM | #9 | |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,476
|
Quote:
|
|
23 July 2017, 09:17 PM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,803
|
That was funny Bas.
Not much about Rolex is 'dirt cheap'. If he takes it to a RSC will they insist on a full service?
__________________
E |
23 July 2017, 10:02 PM | #11 | |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,476
|
Quote:
They can't force a customer anything, customer is king. Personally I'd recommend a full service (minus polishing) as well, lubricants are likely to be dry after 16 years. But I'm serious, gaskets are really cheap and they have to be replaced. |
|
23 July 2017, 10:09 PM | #12 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,803
|
.
__________________
E |
25 July 2017, 08:39 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 4
|
Thank you, everyone - for advice that's both interesting and sensible.
|
25 July 2017, 08:46 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,281
|
|
25 July 2017, 09:26 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,057
|
Bas is right.
__________________
------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.