The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 July 2014, 02:19 PM   #1
sennheiserz
"TRF" Member
 
sennheiserz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Dave
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: ♛ + Ω +
Posts: 601
RubberB: Tang buckle vs Glidelock compatible

Im strongly considering getting one for my SubC ND. They look cool, are more casual and I don't have to worry about scratching up my band.

Can't decide if I'd want the tang buckle or Glidelock compatible one...Anyone owned both and has some thoughts?



__________________
My Watch Blog - http://www.wristtimes.com

Collection: Rolex Sub NDc 114060 | Omega SMP 861 | Apple Watch SS
sennheiserz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 02:23 PM   #2
FiftyTwoEighty
2024 Pledge Member
 
FiftyTwoEighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Woody
Location: Surf City USA
Watch: me live @the Beach
Posts: 1,782
I went with a tang buckle on both of my RubberBs -- I wanted an even lower profile look.

Once they come out with a tang option for my 216570, I will likely pick up another one.
__________________

Some 4 digits, 5 digits, and 6 digits

2FA
FiftyTwoEighty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 02:25 PM   #3
applebook
"TRF" Member
 
applebook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
But wouldn't using the Glidelock clasp sort of defeat part of the purpose since you'd be subjecting the clasp to scratches?

For straps, I strongly suggest a deployant to prolong the strap's life.
__________________
applebook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 03:27 PM   #4
T01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,481
Tang.
T01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 03:29 PM   #5
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Don't have but vote glide lock...
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 09:48 PM   #6
Rolexpharm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bensalem, Pa
Posts: 638
vote for the glide lock. it keeps it classy and feels somewhat original
Rolexpharm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 10:00 PM   #7
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 35,729
Glide lock is a nice touch.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 10:42 PM   #8
mtb
"TRF" Member
 
mtb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Singapore
Watch: Sky/Sea/Land
Posts: 681
I had the Tang for DSSD... but outgrew it and found myself in-between 2 holes..

Then I got the glidelock version for DSSD... and it felt awesome! :)

BTW I have the glidelock version for 114060 earlier and love every second with it
mtb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 11:42 PM   #9
sportsmaven20
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
 
sportsmaven20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Randy
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,917
I do not own a Rubber B, but if I did, I would choose the tang buckle as it looks better to me.

Just my $.02
sportsmaven20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 11:43 PM   #10
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,492
not only does tang look better (IMHO), but, it's one less thing to fiddgle with when switching back and forth.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2014, 11:58 PM   #11
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
Tang!
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 12:09 AM   #12
jcd
"TRF" Member
 
jcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Jack
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: me vector
Posts: 1,152
I'm thinking of buying one of these for my sub. If I do, I'm going with the tang.
jcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 12:53 AM   #13
Outrlimit
"TRF" Member
 
Outrlimit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Posts: 147
Another consideration - the tang version tapers to 18mm while the clasp version tapers to 16mm. I like the slightly wider look on a rubber strap. The drawback of the tang is that the buckle is poorly designed and tends to stick up rather than lay flat. I solved this by substituting a buckle from a $15 strap. It surprises me that with all the R&D that went into the strap design they couldn't get the buckle right.
Outrlimit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 01:18 AM   #14
Benomos
"TRF" Member
 
Benomos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bernie
Location: Canada
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 68
Rubber B

Go with the Tang.. I have one on my Seadweller and very comfortable.. the other advantage is that the Glidelock stays on my original band and easier to change bands without the the hassel of Glidelock dis-assembly.
Bernie
Benomos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 01:20 AM   #15
Golden Ellipse
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Family first
Posts: 652
I've had both and will not own another one that uses the Glidelock or factory clasp.

Reason? Have a look at the attachment point on the RubberB strap where it connects into the OEM clasp -- it's like 1/4 to 3/8 of an inch wide -- who wants their Rolex watch being held on by <3/8 of an inch of soft rubber?

Conversely the pin and tang buckle design is robust and comfortable. Great strap.
Golden Ellipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 02:06 AM   #16
One Ping Only
"TRF" Member
 
One Ping Only's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Ken
Location: WI
Watch: several
Posts: 1,639
I have the tang and love it. Easier IMO to not have to swap the clasp, and I like the lower profile look.
__________________
I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one.
One Ping Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 02:07 AM   #17
bmwsubmariner
"TRF" Member
 
bmwsubmariner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: US
Posts: 353
Go with the tang.
bmwsubmariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 07:03 AM   #18
rainbowmax
"TRF" Member
 
rainbowmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: rome italy
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 165
Tang, low profile and no scratches
rainbowmax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 10:27 AM   #19
sennheiserz
"TRF" Member
 
sennheiserz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Dave
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: ♛ + Ω +
Posts: 601
Thanks for everyone's opinions, as a die hard bracelet switcher I think the tang works better so I don't have to disassemble the glidelock to quickly switch things up. In addition, as others have noted, the original glidelock will still be subjected to scratches. I'll write a post about it if I decide to take the plunge. Thanks!
__________________
My Watch Blog - http://www.wristtimes.com

Collection: Rolex Sub NDc 114060 | Omega SMP 861 | Apple Watch SS
sennheiserz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 12:27 PM   #20
skywood
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Raymond
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 158
Tang!
skywood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 04:46 PM   #21
gregvisser
"TRF" Member
 
gregvisser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Greg Visser
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 543
Glidelock for sure. Just safer putting it on and taking it off. And looks much nicer in terms of finish.

Greg
gregvisser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 July 2014, 11:10 PM   #22
Bucky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 593
Recently just purchased the Rubber B for my DSSD, LOVE IT..I went for the tang buckle as i didn't want the clasp to get scratched and it gives it a nicer look (IMO).
Bucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.