The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 February 2016, 04:25 PM   #31
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrchrisx69 View Post
Just curious which you all prefer? And with date or no date?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrchrisx69 View Post
Well you got the Sea Dweller, Sub and GMT that all look similar and you can only buy one, which would it be?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flstfirider View Post
The Pelegos blue in my opinion rates higher than the Submariner and Sea Dweller. The Ti, inhouse movement, and lumed ceramic bezel are all winners.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Redbulls View Post
That's an interesting point. A higher depth rating then the standard Sub, additional diving bands, better lume, significantly cheaper. Doesn't say Rolex on it (not sure how important that is to the OP) so we're going outside of the brand but if the OP's main criteria was a watch that functions best for a true dive watch, the Pelagos has some strong points.

I think it's a great watch and the adjustable clasp in concept was great BUT not having the pivot makes it not as refined and the springs for the auto adjustable feature are too strong, so they mount the watch too tight for my taste.

Yes, but it doesn't seem the OP specified the dive watch that actually functions as a true dive watch for actual diving. If he had, the Pelagos is a pretty decent pick. The springs seem strong, but for actual fitment over a 5mm wetsuit......I can tell you that the auto-adjusting bracelet functions beautifully to adapt to the compression of your wetsuit at depth. I bought my Pelagos hoping it could take the place of my diver for actual diving. Unfortunately, it has a drawback that was a real concern IMHO. The bezel is only 60-click, so it is difficult to set the bezel precisely when starting to descend. When cross-referencing my elapsed dive time with my digital gauge, I was usually 1-2 min off. That never happened with the 120-click bezel of the Rolex divers. I wish it had drilled-through lug holes, but otherwise it did tick many boxes......with the exception of the 60-click bezel issue. It was a deal breaker for me.

What is the best actual diver?? Drilled through lug holed 14060M, 16610, or 16600 IMHO. The 16600 edges the 14060M slightly due to the date. I realize that you don't need the date while actually diving, but you do need it while analyzing mixed gases and tagging dive tanks. I guess you could say that the 16610 edges out the 16600 due to the fact that it has on less hole in the midcase for a seal to fail. Why not the new ceramics with their "superior" bracelets?? Lack of drilled through lug holes and the fact that the bezel is not really end-user removable. I can't tell you how key it has been for me the couple times that I have jammed the bezel to a frozen position to be able to pop the bezel off and clean underneath to bring it back to proper functioning. I guess the other issue for me is cost of repair if the is breakage/damage to the bezel insert. I can stomach $100 or less for a new bezel insert vs 4-5x that cost or more.

This is all just through personal experience and JMHO of course. Maybe a couple pics of these doing their job after this long ramble.







__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2016, 07:32 PM   #32
Abdullasaif
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dubai
Watch: bipolar
Posts: 2,854
No date sub C
Abdullasaif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2016, 07:52 PM   #33
toneafficianado
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
toneafficianado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,201
I would go for the SD 4K. Huge depth rating plus glidelock clasp.
toneafficianado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2016, 09:32 PM   #34
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,389
Best? Personal and to each his own...
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2016, 11:03 PM   #35
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,593
Sub Date of course!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00
Zenith 02.470.405
Henry Archer Eclipse

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2016, 06:48 AM   #36
NeedlessKane
"TRF" Member
 
NeedlessKane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: 1991 14060 Sub
Posts: 498
14060 2 line on a NATO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1991 14060 Submariner
1994 Tudor Big Block
1995 Rolex Explorer II
1992 Omega Speedmaster Pro
NeedlessKane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2016, 06:54 AM   #37
ltmgeller
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
ltmgeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 21,355
DSSD hands down.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (42.0 KB, 107 views)
ltmgeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2016, 08:59 AM   #38
imperio
"TRF" Member
 
imperio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: this space
Posts: 1,867


A DSSD for any occasion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
imperio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2016, 09:13 AM   #39
RIDE
"TRF" Member
 
RIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 33
Best? Any will outperform what most mortal men will need from them....DSSD, SD 4K, Sub....you really can't go wrong!

By definition....the DSSD is the best dive watch...but buy the one you prefer, and rock it with pride!

RIDE
RIDE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2016, 09:15 AM   #40
Timesurfer
"TRF" Member
 
Timesurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: 12,000+ Lakes!
Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR
Posts: 840
sub nd...
Timesurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2016, 09:19 AM   #41
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,614
"Best" by waterproofness would be DSSD
"Best" for you is personal, and there will be no universal consensus
eonflux is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2016, 12:50 AM   #42
mrchrisx69
"TRF" Member
 
mrchrisx69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 189
I ended up getting the GMT master II instead!

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Attached Images
File Type: jpg uploadfromtaptalk1455461338460.jpg (54.0 KB, 55 views)
File Type: jpg uploadfromtaptalk1455461349846.jpg (49.2 KB, 51 views)
mrchrisx69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.