ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 April 2006, 12:08 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 15
|
Rolex or Pan?
I have been bit by the rolex bug and just bought a new sub no-date. I want a Sea Dweller but i also want a panerai. Any thoughts on pros and cons for either watch?
|
13 April 2006, 12:25 AM | #2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The SD is touted as the 'toughest' Rolex made because it has a thicker case and crystal. It's also more stealthy as it has no cyclops. It's an outstanding watch, without question, running a tried and true robust movement.
To compare to a Panerai is like comparing apples to JJs. The Panny is a totally different watch in every respect. It's bigger, thicker, most are on a strap, the movements Panerai uses are just as robust as the Rolex 3135, and you can get auto or hand wound, depending on the model. While the SD is stealthy, all Panerai watches are 'in your face'. Since you have a no-date-Sub, getting a SD in my opinion would be akin to basically having two of the same watch (looks wise). If you've been bitten by the Panerai bug, it won't leave your system, trust me. Then you also get into the strap sickness that so many Paneristis enjoy. Bottom line is, get the one you like best. You can always get the other one down the road. |
13 April 2006, 12:52 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
|
I personally prefer the look and feel of Rolex. The Panerai has never been a watch that I've had an interest in, partially because of its voluminous size. My Sub has been a perfect watch.
|
13 April 2006, 01:00 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Bolton, UK.
Watch: Daytona 116520
Posts: 6,844
|
I had a Panny and sold it. I did not think it was as well built as a Rolex and did not think it worthy of all the hype. Now if it had been a vintage Panny it would have been a different matter. For me the modern Panny is a usurper.
__________________
A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.........Segal's Law Member #10 |
13 April 2006, 01:05 AM | #5 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I thought a 'usurper' was something someone else had for supper. |
|
13 April 2006, 02:44 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Real Name: Rob Dadd
Location: London
Posts: 134
|
I wouldn't get an SD if I already had a Sub, or vice-versa. Too similiar.
I've owned a 40mm Panerai (PAM 48) which just didn't look right (way too small), and kept really bad time from new (the COSC certificate it came with was totally wrong). I hated the way the winding rotor banged about in the case as well - It got flipped pretty quickly! I than bought a 44mm manual wind (PAM 005) which I initially really liked, until I noticed the crown protector was poorly fitted, and it acquired scratches and dings like no watch I have ever owned. I also found the deployment on the band/strap uncomfortable, and once again the timekeeping was way off (well, -20 seconds a day) When it went in for service it came back with the strap screws glued in, and no adjustment to the timekeeping. Sadly, this was the end of my interest in Panerai - I like the look, but they don't build them like Rolex. And how many 'special' editions are there? Interesting thing that just struck me - it took 3 years to find a Sub Date in an AD at list price, yet even now if you walk up Bond Street you can easily buy a Luminor Marina, steel or Ti, manual or auto, even saw a steel 'destro' yesterday. The rarity thing must be (at least partially) a myth. |
13 April 2006, 03:06 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,507
|
Frist of all, welcome you to TRF, JH. Glad you found your way to our friendly little madhouse.
Now you see the difference between those of us who are gentlemen and the rest of the Phillistines here. They just jump right in answering questions and don't bother to welcome a newcomer to our midst. But don't mind them. They have no manners. As for thoughts on the PAM, wait for Daren (dman) to log on. He'll be happy to extol the virtues of Panerai for you. For me, they're either to big or too small. The only one I might consider is the GMT, but then I like anything with complications. Stick around and enjoy the fun here. Don't be afraid to post. With few exceptions, we don't bite (but you gotta watch out for this bald loon from Kiwiland - don't turn your back on him and never look him straight in the eye).
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
13 April 2006, 03:27 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Canada, eh
Watch: can I?
Posts: 6,241
|
Firstly, welcome to our home.
I have both Rolex (Sub) and Pannie's. I have had no problems with either of them, but it might be bit soon to comment on the Pams , as I have only had one for a few months now. I really like the simplicity on the dials of the Pam's I have chosen. For me it is a nice change from bracelet to strap. Just to change things up.
__________________
Something witty to go here. Member # 293 |
13 April 2006, 04:20 AM | #9 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Hi JH,
A very BIG welcome to TRF. Hope you enjoy your stay here. I'm the "JJ" these guys keep referring to!! Rolex or Panny? In all fairness, I would be the WRONG person to ask 'cause I would straight way say: ROLEX....but then that's me!! So in all fairness to you, wait for Daren to log on. He will give you a truer picture on Panny as well as Rollies 'cause he owns both. Either way, you can't go wrong. They are both excellent time pieces. Cheers - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
13 April 2006, 05:00 AM | #10 |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,583
|
I often go to a BMW forum to ask if I should get a BMW or a Mecredes.
In all fairness you are talking about two totally different animals. The SD is classic with instant recognition. It is a very reliable and durable movement that is tougher than anything you can throw at it. It will last a lifetime and never go out of style. It is a great watch that you would be able to pass down to your family. The Panerai is a bit of an enigma. I personally wear my Pannies 90% of the time. I like the fact that they are hardly ever seen on the wrist of another person and when you do see them on a person 99% of the time a nice conversation is struck up. I love the big bold look and also the wearing comfort that I have found with them. I am a fan of the strap options and the different models. If I want to feel a bracelet on my wrist I reach for my YM, and that is nice to be able to do. I to tend to wear my Pannies though, they are just more individualistic and less mainstream to me. You can't go wrong either way. Best of luck in your hunt and welcome to TRF.
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo. |
13 April 2006, 05:03 AM | #11 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
Cheers - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
13 April 2006, 05:19 AM | #12 | |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,583
|
Quote:
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo. |
|
13 April 2006, 05:21 AM | #13 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
13 April 2006, 05:22 AM | #14 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Bottom line is, just as Daren agreed with me, comparing a Sea Dweller to any Panerai is like comparing apples to JJs. You can't. Completely different in look and feel. Most Rolex owners, if you see one on the street don't know jack about their watch other than 'it's a Rolex' whereas as Daren says, with Panny owners often good conversations are struck and the owners tend to be a little fanatical about their watch(es). Two great watches (I don't think there's a bad Panerai since he didn't mention a specific model)... but very different in every aspect. |
|
13 April 2006, 05:24 AM | #15 |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,583
|
Johnny
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo. |
13 April 2006, 05:25 AM | #16 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Hey Johnny,
Guess what? My 11,000th is directed towards you and in your honour!! You're still Tosser No.1 !!! And now off to work I rush...7:25 on a Thursday morning!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
13 April 2006, 09:35 AM | #17 |
TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,360
|
I LOVE my 16610 and am enjoying the heck out of my BM and would also like to have a roleseum YM one day. But I also would like to have a 112 also
__________________
JJ Last edited by mailman; 13 April 2006 at 09:35 AM.. |
14 April 2006, 03:31 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,338
|
Do as me my son...
AND GET BOTH
__________________
I'm a perpetual kind of guy Resident Audemars Piguet Fanatic |
14 April 2006, 03:39 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 792
|
i personally am not a fan of panerai but given that you already have a sub, a SD aswell will be too similar.. buy something else.. whether it be panerai or any other brand.
|
14 April 2006, 04:23 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sydney,australia
Watch: gmt11c/ DSSD
Posts: 108
|
I am throwing the same thing around at the moment.Had a 111 and sold it.Now i regret it.
I am thinking a sub date or a 112 but they are both so different.The panny is all the rage at the moment and the new ones due in Dec 06 look great (232 and 249) but good luck getting one.But i have never owned a Rolex and really want a sub date.To me the Panny will get noticed more whereas the Rolex is a bit more subtle yet just as stylish. If its only one,IMHO go the Rolex.It will never date,is classy yet sporty,built like a tank and an all-time classic.Cant go wrong. |
15 April 2006, 04:59 AM | #21 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
15 April 2006, 08:21 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sydney,australia
Watch: gmt11c/ DSSD
Posts: 108
|
Sorry i didnt read your opening post properly.If you already have a sub and tossing up between a sea dweller and a panny,its a no-brainer.Go the panny.
The sea dweller is an awesome watch but why not have one of each.Thats my eventual goal,to have a rolex and a panny. |
15 April 2006, 08:57 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Ren
Location: Toronto On Canada
Posts: 1,886
|
Welcme to TRF my friend, keep your hands in the ride at all times and don't ever feed the JJ's!
IMHO the Sea Dweller is too close to the Sub Date to get that instead of a Panny. I have had a chance to borrow and get a lot of info about Pannies through a friend who is a big collector and let me tell you that wearing a 111 and a Sea Dweller there is no comparison... two totally different animals! The Sea Dweller is a classic and you would'nt be dissapointed getting that beauty, but if you have a craving for something a little more uncommon and bold then a Pan may be the way to go. Just do your research and go with the one that you can look at on your wrist every other day! After reading some of the posts on this thread the Pan may have some issues that I was'nt aware of. I myself and leaning towards a Panny as my next baby as I now own a Sub Date and an Omega Chrono. Good luck and let us know what you wind up with OK?
__________________
“Hail to the king, baby" Ash (Army of Darkness 1992) |
15 April 2006, 12:59 PM | #24 | |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,583
|
Quote:
The PAM will get noticed because people will be curious as to the "odd" looking watch you are wearing, but the Rolex will get noticed because it is a Rolex and people "know" that watch and the "look" that it carries. Neither are bad, just what has happened in my own expierence.
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo. |
|
15 April 2006, 01:00 PM | #25 | |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,583
|
Quote:
I am trying to figure out which PAM will be next, but to each their own. If it makes you smile then you should go for it, no matter the brand.
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo. |
|
15 April 2006, 02:09 PM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 15
|
Now i am getting desperate. I went by the watch store today and they had a used SD that was in perfect condition. They wanted 4300. for it. I am almost tempted to take my Bell and Ross acrylic pilot and my Sub no-date and trade it in for it.
|
15 April 2006, 07:23 PM | #27 | |
TRF Moderator & DATE-JUST41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,360
|
Quote:
|
|
16 April 2006, 10:56 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: sydney,australia
Watch: gmt11c/ DSSD
Posts: 108
|
My local AD has a mint condition LNIB rolex sea dweller for about the same price as a BNIB panny 111.
You cant go wrong with either.I love the 000,005.111,112 models and also the 210 is sweet(right dman).The 190 is my dream panny and the 127 fiddy is stunning. My ultimate decision would be panny 190 v rolex yachtmaster.But hey what i decision !!!! |
16 April 2006, 12:55 PM | #29 | |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,583
|
Quote:
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo. |
|
17 April 2006, 12:56 PM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 15
|
I have decided to wait until i find a new SD at a discount. I am going to keep my subbie since it is my first rollie.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.